[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

The Republican Convention - Beaker - Jul 18, 2024 - 4:53pm
 
NY Times Strands - maryte - Jul 18, 2024 - 4:31pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - triskele - Jul 18, 2024 - 4:17pm
 
The Obituary Page - Steely_D - Jul 18, 2024 - 4:13pm
 
Joe Biden - Steely_D - Jul 18, 2024 - 4:11pm
 
Living in America - oldviolin - Jul 18, 2024 - 3:37pm
 
NYTimes Connections - maryte - Jul 18, 2024 - 3:07pm
 
Wordle - daily game - maryte - Jul 18, 2024 - 2:14pm
 
Name My Band - sunybuny - Jul 18, 2024 - 12:30pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Jul 18, 2024 - 12:29pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Jul 18, 2024 - 11:13am
 
July 2024 Photo Theme - Summer - MrDill - Jul 18, 2024 - 11:05am
 
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today... - oldviolin - Jul 18, 2024 - 10:28am
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Jul 18, 2024 - 9:19am
 
Jon Stewart interview - Steely_D - Jul 18, 2024 - 7:36am
 
The Human Condition - dkathrens77 - Jul 18, 2024 - 6:51am
 
Gardeners Photos - Beaker - Jul 18, 2024 - 5:43am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jul 18, 2024 - 5:26am
 
Project 2025 - Beaker - Jul 18, 2024 - 5:09am
 
Israel - R_P - Jul 17, 2024 - 9:12pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jul 17, 2024 - 8:34pm
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - kurtster - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:45pm
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:30pm
 
Things You Thought Today - R_P - Jul 17, 2024 - 6:05pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 17, 2024 - 6:03pm
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Jul 17, 2024 - 2:21pm
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Jul 17, 2024 - 2:04pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - ladron - Jul 17, 2024 - 1:05pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - Steely_D - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:51am
 
Best Song Comments. - q4Fry - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:32am
 
Rhetorical questions - sunybuny - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:29am
 
Musky Mythology - Red_Dragon - Jul 17, 2024 - 5:47am
 
What questions would you like to answer for the world? - oldviolin - Jul 16, 2024 - 5:43pm
 
Democratic Party - Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2024 - 4:48pm
 
Race in America - Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:53pm
 
Live Music - skyguy - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:44pm
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:43pm
 
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 16, 2024 - 2:58pm
 
New Music - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 2:26pm
 
Gimmie 5 Kurt! - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 12:30pm
 
China - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 12:05pm
 
Acoustic Guitar - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 11:08am
 
Bear! - Beaker - Jul 16, 2024 - 6:43am
 
2024 Elections! - R_P - Jul 15, 2024 - 8:43pm
 
Favorite Quotes - Isabeau - Jul 15, 2024 - 3:43pm
 
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year - Isabeau - Jul 15, 2024 - 12:25pm
 
The Truth About (Modern) Popular Music - Proclivities - Jul 15, 2024 - 8:18am
 
Please don't ban me, but: Taylor Swift... - sunybuny - Jul 15, 2024 - 4:55am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Beaker - Jul 14, 2024 - 3:51pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Jul 14, 2024 - 12:52pm
 
Media Bias - Beaker - Jul 14, 2024 - 9:46am
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2024 - 7:51am
 
AH! There's an elephant in the room! - Red_Dragon - Jul 13, 2024 - 3:42pm
 
Outstanding Covers - DaveInSaoMiguel - Jul 13, 2024 - 12:49pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:34am
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:23am
 
Europe - thisbody - Jul 12, 2024 - 11:35pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Jul 12, 2024 - 9:59pm
 
RP on Mac Just Stopped Working - tourtelot - Jul 12, 2024 - 9:35pm
 
Are they married yet? YES THEY ARE! - Manbird - Jul 12, 2024 - 2:51pm
 
Tech & Science - Manbird - Jul 12, 2024 - 2:46pm
 
Classic TV Curiosities - Proclivities - Jul 12, 2024 - 12:50pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - Jul 12, 2024 - 10:48am
 
Florida - miamizsun - Jul 12, 2024 - 7:05am
 
Regarding Birds - Jiggz - Jul 12, 2024 - 1:41am
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - thisbody - Jul 11, 2024 - 10:36pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Antigone - Jul 11, 2024 - 2:36pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 11, 2024 - 2:05pm
 
Record Store Day - Proclivities - Jul 11, 2024 - 8:18am
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - Jul 11, 2024 - 5:12am
 
Derplahoma! - sunybuny - Jul 11, 2024 - 4:39am
 
Russia - thisbody - Jul 11, 2024 - 3:11am
 
France - thisbody - Jul 11, 2024 - 3:04am
 
Britain - thisbody - Jul 10, 2024 - 11:36pm
 
Good Idea / Bad Idea - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 10, 2024 - 4:39pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Supreme Court: Who's Next? Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 37, 38, 39  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 21, 2023 - 2:34pm

 rgio wrote:
Alito comes out swinging, with a "rebuttal" in the WSJ.

What's amazing is the apparent lack of understanding by the SCOTUS justices regarding right and wrong.   Just because the rules don't say something explicitly, doesn't mean it's OK to do.

You can't legislate morality so why bother trying.

I always imagined such judges would have really nice salaries.

I'm sure they're all familiar with quid pro quo. And appearances.
rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 21, 2023 - 1:51pm

 R_P wrote:
Alito comes out swinging, with a "rebuttal" in the WSJ.

What's amazing is the apparent lack of understanding by the SCOTUS justices regarding right and wrong.   Just because the rules don't say something explicitly, doesn't mean it's OK to do.
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 21, 2023 - 11:53am

Rules-based oligarch
Justice Samuel Alito Took Luxury Fishing Vacation With GOP Billionaire Who Later Had Cases Before the Court
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2023 - 12:56pm


Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Apr 25, 2023 - 12:55pm

 kcar wrote:

Supreme Court: Who's Next?

Neil Gorsuch, come on down! 

Law firm head bought Gorsuch-owned property


. . . . . . . . 

Supreme Court rules do not prevent justices from engaging in financial transactions with people with interest in court decisions, but Gorsuch’s dealings with Duffy expose the weakness of the court’s disclosure procedures. For instance, in reporting his Colorado income, Gorsuch listed as his source only the name that he and his two co-owners gave themselves, Walden Group, LLC. The report didn’t indicate that there had been a real estate sale or a purchaser.

Such a sale would raise ethical problems for officials serving in many other branches of government, but the Supreme Court sets its own rules. It has largely left justices to make their own decisions about when and how to report outside gifts and income.


   shoes be droppin ...
kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: Apr 25, 2023 - 12:28pm

Supreme Court: Who's Next?

Neil Gorsuch, come on down! 

Law firm head bought Gorsuch-owned property

The Supreme Court justice did not report the identity of the purchaser, whose firm has had numerous cases before the court.

For nearly two years beginning in 2015, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch sought a buyer for a 40-acre tract of property he co-owned in rural Granby, Colo.

Nine days after he was confirmed by the Senate for a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court, the then-circuit court judge got one: The chief executive of Greenberg Traurig, one of the nation’s biggest law firms with a robust practice before the high court. Gorsuch owned the property with two other individuals.

On April 16 of 2017, Greenberg’s Brian Duffy put under contract the 3,000-square foot log home on the Colorado River and nestled in the mountains northwest of Denver, according to real estate records.

He and his wife closed on the house a month later, paying $1.825 million, according to a deed in the county’s record system. Gorsuch, who held a 20 percent stake, reported making between $250,001 and $500,000 from the sale on his federal disclosure forms.

Gorsuch did not disclose the identity of the purchaser. That box was left blank.

Since then, Greenberg Traurig has been involved in at least 22 cases before or presented to the court, according to a POLITICO review of the court’s docket.

They include cases in which Greenberg either filed amicus briefs or represented parties. In the 12 cases where Gorsuch’s opinion is recorded, he sided with Greenberg Traurig clients eight times and against them four times.

In addition, a Denver-based lawyer for Greenberg represented North Dakota in what became one of the more highly publicized rulings in recent years, a multistate suit which reversed former President Barack Obama’s plan to fight climate change through the Clean Air Act.

Gorsuch joined the court’s other five conservative judges in agreeing with the plaintiffs — including Greenberg’s client — that the Environmental Protection Agency had overstepped its authority by regulating carbon emissions from power plants in the decision that makes it more difficult for the executive branch to regulate emissions without express authorization from Congress.


...


Supreme Court rules do not prevent justices from engaging in financial transactions with people with interest in court decisions, but Gorsuch’s dealings with Duffy expose the weakness of the court’s disclosure procedures. For instance, in reporting his Colorado income, Gorsuch listed as his source only the name that he and his two co-owners gave themselves, Walden Group, LLC. The report didn’t indicate that there had been a real estate sale or a purchaser.

Such a sale would raise ethical problems for officials serving in many other branches of government, but the Supreme Court sets its own rules. It has largely left justices to make their own decisions about when and how to report outside gifts and income.




R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 14, 2023 - 5:39pm

The Corrupt Courts and the Feckless Senate Judiciary Committee
Negligent Democratic leadership won’t challenge Clarence Thomas and other lawless judges.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Aug 24, 2022 - 6:36pm

 R_P wrote:

Private money in politics is everything wrong with this country.
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 24, 2022 - 6:34pm

The other swamp
Massive dark money windfall: New conservative group got $1.6 billion from single donor
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 31, 2022 - 12:37pm

Black Women in Law Feel Pride and Frustration Ahead of Court Nominee
As Biden prepares to nominate the first Black woman to the nation’s highest court, members of this small, elite group are watching with complicated emotions.
Manbird

Manbird Avatar

Location: La Villa Toscana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 28, 2022 - 5:24pm

Supreme Court WHAT?

Bill_J

Bill_J Avatar



Posted: Jan 28, 2022 - 3:02pm

 Steely_D wrote:


It’s true that another way of looking at this is “promises kept.” But it was a racist, sexist promise to start.
“If I have a chance to put another judge on the Supreme Court, I promise to look at everyone from all perspectives: gender, race, training, geography, and more. “


There are highly qualified candidates from all genders, race etc. etc.  I don't think that it's so racist and sexist to say that you will pick from a pool of highly qualified candidates that has been continually ignored for decades since the first woman & first black man were nominated and confirmed to the Court. It's a logical progression. Contrary to what some people are willing to accept we are a diverse country and our government "by and for the people" should reflect that. 

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 28, 2022 - 2:40pm

“Of course he’s upset. Think about it. For almost all of American
history, the entire Supreme Court was white dudes with bow ties and
weird hair. Now that’s all gone. It’s all gone. Where’s Tucker’s representation, huh?”

islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 28, 2022 - 2:03pm

 Steely_D wrote:


The frustrating part to me is that people are pressuring Biden to fulfill a promise he (shouldn't have) made: put a black woman in the seat. Now this doesn't bug me because I'm racist or sexist - but it bugs me because that's exactly what that promise is. It's racist and sexist to choose someone based on race or sex.
It shouldn't have been done before, resulting in a lot of white people on the court, and it shouldn't be done now in some weird version of tit-for-tat. 

The answer to racism and sexism isn't more racism and sexism.


Trump promised to put a woman on the court and it didn't draw ire.... Didn't Reagan say this as well?  It's hard to get 9 people to properly represent 300million, but having it be an exclusively white male group was problematic. I don't see a problem with trying to make it a bit more diverse. We'll never have true representation (some one actually poor, or who doesn't have connections),  but we could do better.

I'm more concerned that Trump (and most recent repubs) promised to put someone from a list provided by the Federalist Society. Exactly why does this particular group with no public accountability get to pick justices?
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 28, 2022 - 12:35pm

Another example of the Dems given an opportunity, and shooting themselves in the foot.

Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 28, 2022 - 12:09pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:


The deepest downside in this specific case will be that no matter how spectacular the pick turns out, it will always be considered in the context of "the promise." She "didn't get the seat because of her exemplary qualifications, she got it because he painted himself into a corner and he had to choose from a shorter list" sort of thing.


And that's what gives the ammunition to the conservatives to say "bussing and quotas and affirmative action are wrong."
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 28, 2022 - 11:59am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
The deepest downside in this specific case will be that no matter how spectacular the pick turns out, it will always be considered in the context of "the promise." She "didn't get the seat because of her exemplary qualifications, she got it because he painted himself into a corner and he had to choose from a shorter list" sort of thing.

Promises Made, Promises Kept!
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 27, 2022 - 10:03pm

 Steely_D wrote:


The frustrating part to me is that people are pressuring Biden to fulfill a promise he (shouldn't have) made: put a black woman in the seat. Now this doesn't bug me because I'm racist or sexist - but it bugs me because that's exactly what that promise is. It's racist and sexist to choose someone based on race or sex.
It shouldn't have been done before, resulting in a lot of white people on the court, and it shouldn't be done now in some weird version of tit-for-tat. 

The answer to racism and sexism isn't more racism and sexism.


The deepest downside in this specific case will be that no matter how spectacular the pick turns out, it will always be considered in the context of "the promise." She "didn't get the seat because of her exemplary qualifications, she got it because he painted himself into a corner and he had to choose from a shorter list" sort of thing.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 27, 2022 - 6:05am

first i hope that breyer isn't sick

does this pick have to be a an actual bw/woc?
or just identify as a bw/woc?
isn't that important?
one seems much more inclusive...

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jan 26, 2022 - 5:31pm

 miamizsun wrote:

McConnell Says Senate Should Not Confirm New Supreme Court Nominee Just Three Years Before Presidential Election


WASHINGTON, D.C.—With the announcement of Associate Justice Stephen Breyer’s pending retirement dominating the current news cycle, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has put forth the following statement: “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”

When it was pointed out to Senator McConnell that these were the exact same words he used in 2016 on the day of Antonnin Scalia’s death, McConnell explained, “Yes, and the same principle still applies. We should not have a lame-duck president who is clearly on his way out making such an important decision for the nation.”




Yeah, he had already said this a while back. Mitch is a complete piece of shit.
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 37, 38, 39  Next