Oasis — Champagne Supernova
Album: (What's The Story) Morning GloryAvg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 3150
Length: 7:25
Plays (last 30 days): 1
share
tweet
How many special people change
How many lives are living strange
Where were you when we were getting high?
Slowly walking down the hall
Faster than a cannon ball
Where were you while we were getting high?
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova in the sky
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova
A champagne supernova in the sky
Wake up the dawn and ask her why
A dreamer dreams she never dies
Wipe that tear away now from your eye
Slowly walking down the hall
Faster than a cannon ball
Where were you when we were getting high?
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova in the sky
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova
A champagne supernova in the sky
Cos people believe that they're
Gonna get away for the summer
But you and I, we live and die
The world's still spinning round
We don't know why
Why, why, why, why
How many special people change
How many lives are living strange
Where were you when we were getting high?
Slowly walking down the hall
Faster than a cannon ball
Where were you while we were getting high?
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova in the sky
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova
A champagne supernova in the sky
Cos people believe that they're
Gonna get away for the summer
But you and I, we live and die
The world's still spinning round
We don't know why
Why, why, why, why
How many special people change
How many lives are living strange
Where were you when we were getting high?
We were getting high
We were getting high
We were getting high
We were getting high
How many lives are living strange
Where were you when we were getting high?
Slowly walking down the hall
Faster than a cannon ball
Where were you while we were getting high?
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova in the sky
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova
A champagne supernova in the sky
Wake up the dawn and ask her why
A dreamer dreams she never dies
Wipe that tear away now from your eye
Slowly walking down the hall
Faster than a cannon ball
Where were you when we were getting high?
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova in the sky
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova
A champagne supernova in the sky
Cos people believe that they're
Gonna get away for the summer
But you and I, we live and die
The world's still spinning round
We don't know why
Why, why, why, why
How many special people change
How many lives are living strange
Where were you when we were getting high?
Slowly walking down the hall
Faster than a cannon ball
Where were you while we were getting high?
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova in the sky
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova
A champagne supernova in the sky
Cos people believe that they're
Gonna get away for the summer
But you and I, we live and die
The world's still spinning round
We don't know why
Why, why, why, why
How many special people change
How many lives are living strange
Where were you when we were getting high?
We were getting high
We were getting high
We were getting high
We were getting high
Comments (416)add comment
Repetitive whiney arse-gravy from two gobshittes. Nothing to get it past 1. Surprised it even gets a play here.
This is right in so many ways. Soundtrack of our lives.
You know you played this at full volume while driving along in your car, singing your heart out.
Yes you did.
You know you played this at full volume while driving along in your car, singing your heart out.
Yes you did.
Finnbayer wrote:
Thanks for giving me the Trump descriptor I've been searching high and low for!
wonder if you're still this stupid after the last 4 years....
Thanks for giving me the Trump descriptor I've been searching high and low for!
wonder if you're still this stupid after the last 4 years....
Long song but I always listen to the end.
TerryS wrote:
Must be nice to sit so far above the hoi polloi that you can see for miles.
Quite a climb but worth it...
Must be nice to sit so far above the hoi polloi that you can see for miles.
Quite a climb but worth it...
You had to be there.
The "next coming of the Beatles" thing was idiotic and I'm not huge fan of them but this song is strong for me.
this was a guilty pleasure for me back in the day, now its just a pleasure
Yes the gossip was bad and the music was overplayed back in the day, but I still love this album.
you keep playing this bitchin music and I'll never leave work...
drewd wrote:
awesome isn't it
Slowly walking down the hall
Faster than a cannon ball
That don't make a lick of sense!
Faster than a cannon ball
That don't make a lick of sense!
awesome isn't it
timqueeney wrote:
ME Too !!!
Definitely an 8, but gave it a 10 just to piss off the haters.
ME Too !!!
Slowly walking down the hall
Faster than a cannon ball
That don't make a lick of sense!
Faster than a cannon ball
That don't make a lick of sense!
I'll tell you where I was when you were getting high. I was out working to support your lazy asses. Now clean up this mess!
McBuggins wrote:
Nice alliteration.
Derivative drivel by whining whingers.
Nice alliteration.
Definitely an 8, but gave it a 10 just to piss off the haters.
Had tickets to the Atlanta show the day they broke up. At the time they were among my favorite newer bands, so I was (and still am) ticked that I didn't get to see them. I have, however, enjoyed a lot of the music that came from the split. Oh, and if I based my music opinion on the artist's personality, I would not have much to choose from.
Mackmoney3000 wrote:
Same.
Oasis were never my favourite, but I did have this album, and this song is just fine.
I'm the right age (old millennial) that this puts me right back in high school, and therefore get warm fuzzies remembering this song. I'm still not sure if this is a 'good' track but it does hit me in the nostalgia centers...
Same.
Oasis were never my favourite, but I did have this album, and this song is just fine.
sieversfam wrote:
criminally overrated.
Nope, just rated. The rating is on your left. Can't see any crime. What you've done there is, you've just repeated some words people always say.
criminally overrated.
Nope, just rated. The rating is on your left. Can't see any crime. What you've done there is, you've just repeated some words people always say.
joelbb wrote:
Whoops, actually gave it a 2. that feels better!
Same. Don't know why but never cared for this band's music.
Whoops, actually gave it a 2. that feels better!
Same. Don't know why but never cared for this band's music.
Derivative drivel by whining whingers.
There is a certain segment of the RP audience that hates any music that was commercially successful. Or maybe it's anger because they come here to hear what they can't hear on the radio. But I suspect it's just common snobbery to look down on music that is/was easily accessible.
Funny true story of how an Oasis cover band was snowed in for 3 days at a hotel gig.
https://www.usatoday.com/story...
https://www.usatoday.com/story...
mrselfdestruct wrote:
Agreed. But criminally overrated.
These guys are pricks, but they did have a few great songs.
Agreed. But criminally overrated.
h8rhater wrote:
You seem very into schadenfruede. Your posting name checks out, that's for sure. The h8 is strong.
How many albums do you have out?
MTV was hardly a force in 1995. It had long since become a reality show network. Your reference is terribly dated. Like your opinion.
You also seem blithely unaware that they were playing off of John Lennon comparing the Beatles to Jesus when they made that quote. A controversy from an earlier rock era that helped the Beatles grow their fan base in the same way that it helped Oasis at the time. Duh.
The Kinks famously feuded to the point of fisticuffs; the Stones came damn close on a few occasions (Charlie slugged Mick once); the Fogertys hated each other so much they broke up the band. Disagreements in rock bands are part of the process. Chuckles all around.
Also, they may be unpleasant characters to you and others (judging from this board) but, they are talented musicians whose careers are now in their 3rd decade. Both have recent albums out with their current bands. Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds album from last year was one of the best rock albums of the year.
You might try listening to it.
Must be nice to sit so far above the hoi polloi that you can see for miles.
You seem very into schadenfruede. Your posting name checks out, that's for sure. The h8 is strong.
How many albums do you have out?
MTV was hardly a force in 1995. It had long since become a reality show network. Your reference is terribly dated. Like your opinion.
You also seem blithely unaware that they were playing off of John Lennon comparing the Beatles to Jesus when they made that quote. A controversy from an earlier rock era that helped the Beatles grow their fan base in the same way that it helped Oasis at the time. Duh.
The Kinks famously feuded to the point of fisticuffs; the Stones came damn close on a few occasions (Charlie slugged Mick once); the Fogertys hated each other so much they broke up the band. Disagreements in rock bands are part of the process. Chuckles all around.
Also, they may be unpleasant characters to you and others (judging from this board) but, they are talented musicians whose careers are now in their 3rd decade. Both have recent albums out with their current bands. Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds album from last year was one of the best rock albums of the year.
You might try listening to it.
Must be nice to sit so far above the hoi polloi that you can see for miles.
joelbb wrote:
Listen closely. It's a Champagne Supernover.
What is a "Champagne Supernova" other than a meaningless rock title/lyric? Gave it a 3.
Listen closely. It's a Champagne Supernover.
Why is there so much animosity toward this band?
joelbb wrote:
Whoops, actually gave it a 2. that feels better!
What is a "Champagne Supernova" other than a meaningless rock title/lyric? Gave it a 3.
Whoops, actually gave it a 2. that feels better!
What is a "Champagne Supernova" other than a meaningless rock title/lyric? Gave it a 3.
Audience splitting to say the least 😁
wifesboyfriend wrote:
I agree!
Good song, but extremely overplayed.
I agree!
Typical 90s overindulgence. Still gave it an 8 though.
cosmicjoe wrote:
that's what FM radio's for \.
that's what FM radio's for \.
wifesboyfriend wrote:
Good song, but extremely overplayed.
Personnaly, I never like this band ... it seems like "reheated dishes" from others musics
No
Good song, but extremely overplayed.
h8rhater wrote:
You seem very into schadenfruede. Your posting name checks out, that's for sure. The h8 is strong.
How many albums do you have out?
MTV was hardly a force in 1995. It had long since become a reality show network. Your reference is terribly dated. Like your opinion.
You also seem blithely unaware that they were playing off of John Lennon comparing the Beatles to Jesus when they made that quote. A controversy from an earlier rock era that helped the Beatles grow their fan base in the same way that it helped Oasis at the time. Duh.
The Kinks famously feuded to the point of fisticuffs; the Stones came damn close on a few occasions (Charlie slugged Mick once); the Fogertys hated each other so much they broke up the band. Disagreements in rock bands are part of the process. Chuckles all around.
Also, they may be unpleasant characters to you and others (judging from this board) but, they are talented musicians whose careers are now in their 3rd decade. Both have recent albums out with their current bands. Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds album from last year was one of the best rock albums of the year.
You might try listening to it.
Splendidly put.
You seem very into schadenfruede. Your posting name checks out, that's for sure. The h8 is strong.
How many albums do you have out?
MTV was hardly a force in 1995. It had long since become a reality show network. Your reference is terribly dated. Like your opinion.
You also seem blithely unaware that they were playing off of John Lennon comparing the Beatles to Jesus when they made that quote. A controversy from an earlier rock era that helped the Beatles grow their fan base in the same way that it helped Oasis at the time. Duh.
The Kinks famously feuded to the point of fisticuffs; the Stones came damn close on a few occasions (Charlie slugged Mick once); the Fogertys hated each other so much they broke up the band. Disagreements in rock bands are part of the process. Chuckles all around.
Also, they may be unpleasant characters to you and others (judging from this board) but, they are talented musicians whose careers are now in their 3rd decade. Both have recent albums out with their current bands. Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds album from last year was one of the best rock albums of the year.
You might try listening to it.
Splendidly put.
mrselfdestruct wrote:
to bloody hell with all those cuntz
These guys are pricks, but they did have a few great songs.
Great song
martymoose15 wrote:
Have to agree - but I just read a ton of people who hate Jay Farrar's voice; I feel the same about this vocalist. That aside, I feel Farrar has a lot more to say that is worth listening to.
Terribly over-rated song and band!
More_Cowbell wrote:
It only is for those without.
Powerful and sweet tune! This should not be a personality contest.
It only is for those without.
Reminds me of a good friend. Where are ya buddy I'm getting high? RIP my dear friend.
h8rhater wrote:
You seem very into schadenfruede. Your posting name checks out, that's for sure. The h8 is strong.
How many albums do you have out?
MTV was hardly a force in 1995. It had long since become a reality show network. Your reference is terribly dated. Like your opinion.
You also seem blithely unaware that they were playing off of John Lennon comparing the Beatles to Jesus when they made that quote. A controversy from an earlier rock era that helped the Beatles grow their fan base in the same way that it helped Oasis at the time. Duh.
The Kinks famously feuded to the point of fisticuffs; the Stones came damn close on a few occasions (Charlie slugged Mick once); the Fogertys hated each other so much they broke up the band. Disagreements in rock bands are part of the process. Chuckles all around.
Also, they may be unpleasant characters to you and others (judging from this board) but, they are talented musicians whose careers are now in their 3rd decade. Both have recent albums out with their current bands. Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds album from last year was one of the best rock albums of the year.
You might try listening to it.
Your comment about MTV being irrelevant to music by 1995 was spot on.
But best was your use of the term "schadenfruede" Ha Ha! I'm sure most read right over that with nary a clue as to what it means.
You seem very into schadenfruede. Your posting name checks out, that's for sure. The h8 is strong.
How many albums do you have out?
MTV was hardly a force in 1995. It had long since become a reality show network. Your reference is terribly dated. Like your opinion.
You also seem blithely unaware that they were playing off of John Lennon comparing the Beatles to Jesus when they made that quote. A controversy from an earlier rock era that helped the Beatles grow their fan base in the same way that it helped Oasis at the time. Duh.
The Kinks famously feuded to the point of fisticuffs; the Stones came damn close on a few occasions (Charlie slugged Mick once); the Fogertys hated each other so much they broke up the band. Disagreements in rock bands are part of the process. Chuckles all around.
Also, they may be unpleasant characters to you and others (judging from this board) but, they are talented musicians whose careers are now in their 3rd decade. Both have recent albums out with their current bands. Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds album from last year was one of the best rock albums of the year.
You might try listening to it.
Your comment about MTV being irrelevant to music by 1995 was spot on.
But best was your use of the term "schadenfruede" Ha Ha! I'm sure most read right over that with nary a clue as to what it means.
Laptopdog wrote:
Not to mention: what the hell is a champagne supernova?
Lyrics: 2
Songcraft: 8
lands at a 6 for me
Despite the lousy lyrics -Slowly moving down the hall, faster than a cannonball ?!- I still like this tune.
The brothers, not so much.
The brothers, not so much.
Not to mention: what the hell is a champagne supernova?
Lyrics: 2
Songcraft: 8
lands at a 6 for me
Despite the lousy lyrics - Slowly moving down the hall, faster than a cannonball ?! - I still like this tune.
The brothers, not so much.
The brothers, not so much.
Bumped up to a solid 3
-1 for this tune
+1 for the epic slideshow pics of stars and such..so I'll leave it at a 5
Long Live RP and hopefully nice responses to this negative post.
+1 for the epic slideshow pics of stars and such..so I'll leave it at a 5
Long Live RP and hopefully nice responses to this negative post.
I'm an ex-pat Mancunian and I dislike Oasis as much as the next guy but, praise given where praise is due , this is an exceptionally good song. There was also a good video to accompany it.
I also have to admit Noel Gallagher came up with on of the funniest quotes I've ever heard when he described his brother thus..." he's a very angry man, he's like a man with a fork in a world of soup".
I also have to admit Noel Gallagher came up with on of the funniest quotes I've ever heard when he described his brother thus..." he's a very angry man, he's like a man with a fork in a world of soup".
h8rhater wrote:
You seem very into schadenfruede. Your posting name checks out, that's for sure. The h8 is strong.
How many albums do you have out?
MTV was hardly a force in 1995. It had long since become a reality show network. Your reference is terribly dated. Like your opinion.
You also seem blithely unaware that they were playing off of John Lennon comparing the Beatles to Jesus when they made that quote. A controversy from an earlier rock era that helped the Beatles grow their fan base in the same way that it helped Oasis at the time. Duh.
The Kinks famously feuded to the point of fisticuffs; the Stones came damn close on a few occasions (Charlie slugged Mick once); the Fogertys hated each other so much they broke up the band. Disagreements in rock bands are part of the process. Chuckles all around.
Also, they may be unpleasant characters to you and others (judging from this board) but, they are talented musicians whose careers are now in their 3rd decade. Both have recent albums out with their current bands. Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds album from last year was one of the best rock albums of the year.
You might try listening to it.
great level headed comment.they have a few good tracks and have brought pleasure to millions which is a damn site more than the cranky shits on here have ever done.
You seem very into schadenfruede. Your posting name checks out, that's for sure. The h8 is strong.
How many albums do you have out?
MTV was hardly a force in 1995. It had long since become a reality show network. Your reference is terribly dated. Like your opinion.
You also seem blithely unaware that they were playing off of John Lennon comparing the Beatles to Jesus when they made that quote. A controversy from an earlier rock era that helped the Beatles grow their fan base in the same way that it helped Oasis at the time. Duh.
The Kinks famously feuded to the point of fisticuffs; the Stones came damn close on a few occasions (Charlie slugged Mick once); the Fogertys hated each other so much they broke up the band. Disagreements in rock bands are part of the process. Chuckles all around.
Also, they may be unpleasant characters to you and others (judging from this board) but, they are talented musicians whose careers are now in their 3rd decade. Both have recent albums out with their current bands. Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds album from last year was one of the best rock albums of the year.
You might try listening to it.
great level headed comment.they have a few good tracks and have brought pleasure to millions which is a damn site more than the cranky shits on here have ever done.
chyk5 wrote:
Not necessarily in reference to this song but I love Bart's quote!
Not necessarily in reference to this song but I love Bart's quote!
Fuck these guys. They get a break that much better musicians would kill for and they screw it up by being enormous assholes. And at the risk of drawing the trolls, they are not very accomplished musicians.
I'm the right age (old millennial) that this puts me right back in high school, and therefore get warm fuzzies remembering this song. I'm still not sure if this is a 'good' track but it does hit me in the nostalgia centers...
Were (and probably still are ) these guys jerks? Yep! No argument. But their songs are quite poorly rated here, more so than anywhere else. Okay. But it appears from the comments about them that the ratings have more to do with how people perceive them rather than being based upon their songs. Fair enough.
However, then why do some of the rockers-from-past, who were documented pedophiles of the 'groupies of the times,' getting a free pass on how their songs might be rated? Bowie, Page, and _______ (there's plenty, fill it in).
However, then why do some of the rockers-from-past, who were documented pedophiles of the 'groupies of the times,' getting a free pass on how their songs might be rated? Bowie, Page, and _______ (there's plenty, fill it in).
yootz wrote:
It already has!
Yes, they are buts. But if I was rating band members personalities there would be a lot of 1's or lower. The song...it's good (I hope this doesn't go to their heads)
It already has!
Hands over the ears for this one...
jayhamiljr wrote:
I'm not at all convinced John Lennon's statement expanded their fan base. That's an unsubstantiated opinion. John appeared to sincerely regret it. It made their lives hell for a while. It was, I believe, a poorly thought out off-the-cuff remark. They sincerely seemed to regret the extent of their fame, and were not trying to gain more. It was even more stupid for these guys to compare themselves to John, which you seem to believe was calculated. There is plenty of evidence to indicate they fall way short.
Lennon didn't do anything without thinking it out. It may have been poorly thought out, but not off-the-cuff. The Beatles at the time were searching for ways to dirty up their squeaky clean image. This certainly worked even if it snowballed out of proportion to their intent.
Lennon certainly did seem to have a strong opinion on the subject. One that would lead me to believe that he thought a lot about it, given the full context of the quote:
"Christianity will go. It will vanish and shrink. I needn't argue about that; I'm right and I'll be proved right. We're more popular than Jesus now; I don't know which will go first – rock 'n' roll or Christianity. Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. It's them twisting it that ruins it for me."
This original comment was not considered controversial by the English press at the time. It was only when the comments made it to crazy christian America that they blew up into an overreaction that I'm sure surprised Lenon in it's intensity. That said, losing the fandom of folks that would throw your records into a bonfire seems like a small loss.
I'm not at all convinced John Lennon's statement expanded their fan base. That's an unsubstantiated opinion. John appeared to sincerely regret it. It made their lives hell for a while. It was, I believe, a poorly thought out off-the-cuff remark. They sincerely seemed to regret the extent of their fame, and were not trying to gain more. It was even more stupid for these guys to compare themselves to John, which you seem to believe was calculated. There is plenty of evidence to indicate they fall way short.
Lennon didn't do anything without thinking it out. It may have been poorly thought out, but not off-the-cuff. The Beatles at the time were searching for ways to dirty up their squeaky clean image. This certainly worked even if it snowballed out of proportion to their intent.
Lennon certainly did seem to have a strong opinion on the subject. One that would lead me to believe that he thought a lot about it, given the full context of the quote:
"Christianity will go. It will vanish and shrink. I needn't argue about that; I'm right and I'll be proved right. We're more popular than Jesus now; I don't know which will go first – rock 'n' roll or Christianity. Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. It's them twisting it that ruins it for me."
This original comment was not considered controversial by the English press at the time. It was only when the comments made it to crazy christian America that they blew up into an overreaction that I'm sure surprised Lenon in it's intensity. That said, losing the fandom of folks that would throw your records into a bonfire seems like a small loss.
Screature wrote:
They once said they were bigger than the Beatles but that was really tongue-in-cheek IMO.
As much as I hate the Gallagher brothers huge egos and their all too public petty disputes, I have to admit they made some great music.
They are horrible megalomaniacs. They seem to think they are the new Beatles which they are not in any way in any shape, form or fashion.
They once said they were bigger than the Beatles but that was really tongue-in-cheek IMO.
I hated them when they were popular. Now looking back, what a great band. And the Gallaghers' melodrama just adds to the story.
LoudshirtsBand wrote:
Ryan Adams did pretty good with it too.
Ryan Adams did pretty good with it too.
Emwolb wrote:
Mike Flowers' nailed the cover version; not often a cover is better than the original
Wonderwall
Only good thing to come from this band of brothers was Wonderwall, and thank the lord Ryan Adams made the song GREAT
Mike Flowers' nailed the cover version; not often a cover is better than the original
Wonderwall
Yes, they are buts. But if I was rating band members personalities there would be a lot of 1's or lower. The song...it's good (I hope this doesn't go to their heads)
Let's give a hand to all the effort throughout the world involved in finding a vaccine for this virus.
h8rhater wrote:
You seem very into schadenfruede. Your posting name checks out, that's for sure. The h8 is strong.
How many albums to you have out?
MTV was hardly a force in 1995. It had long since become a reality show network. Your reference is terribly dated. Like your opinion.
You also seem blithely unaware that they were playing off of John Lennon comparing the Beatles to Jesus when they made that quote. A controversy from an earlier rock era that helped the Beatles grow their fan base in the same way that it helped Oasis at the time. Duh.
The Kinks famously feuded to the point of fisticuffs; the Stones came damn close on a few occasions (Charlie slugged Mick once); the Fogertys hated each other so much they broke up the band. Disagreements in rock bands are part of the process. Chuckles all around.
Also, they may be unpleasant characters to you and others (judging from this board) but, they are talented musicians whose careers are now in their 3rd decade. Both have recent albums out with their current bands. Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds album from last year was one of the best rock albums of the year.
You might try listening to it.
I'm not at all convinced John Lennon's statement expanded their fan base. That's an unsubstantiated opinion. John appeared to sincerely regret it. It made their lives hell for a while. It was, I believe, a poorly thought out off-the-cuff remark. They sincerely seemed to regret the extent of their fame, and were not trying to gain more. It was even more stupid for these guys to compare themselves to John, which you seem to believe was calculated. There is plenty of evidence to indicate they fall way short.
You seem very into schadenfruede. Your posting name checks out, that's for sure. The h8 is strong.
How many albums to you have out?
MTV was hardly a force in 1995. It had long since become a reality show network. Your reference is terribly dated. Like your opinion.
You also seem blithely unaware that they were playing off of John Lennon comparing the Beatles to Jesus when they made that quote. A controversy from an earlier rock era that helped the Beatles grow their fan base in the same way that it helped Oasis at the time. Duh.
The Kinks famously feuded to the point of fisticuffs; the Stones came damn close on a few occasions (Charlie slugged Mick once); the Fogertys hated each other so much they broke up the band. Disagreements in rock bands are part of the process. Chuckles all around.
Also, they may be unpleasant characters to you and others (judging from this board) but, they are talented musicians whose careers are now in their 3rd decade. Both have recent albums out with their current bands. Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds album from last year was one of the best rock albums of the year.
You might try listening to it.
I'm not at all convinced John Lennon's statement expanded their fan base. That's an unsubstantiated opinion. John appeared to sincerely regret it. It made their lives hell for a while. It was, I believe, a poorly thought out off-the-cuff remark. They sincerely seemed to regret the extent of their fame, and were not trying to gain more. It was even more stupid for these guys to compare themselves to John, which you seem to believe was calculated. There is plenty of evidence to indicate they fall way short.
MrsTom wrote:
I'll tell you how--we were all hoping for another Beatles by then, whether Oasis or Weezer or Radiohead, we didn't care who. It didn't really pan out unfortunately.
I really don’t understand how Oasis ever became as popular as they did.
I'll tell you how--we were all hoping for another Beatles by then, whether Oasis or Weezer or Radiohead, we didn't care who. It didn't really pan out unfortunately.
Maybe they spent too much time getting high... Just sayin...
Somebody should have kicked the Gallagher's sh*t in a long time ago. Think of how hilariously they would have sounded waffling and braying through false teeth.
Never liked this band. Gallagher sounds like he's trying to channel John Lennon.
rate 8 
I really don’t understand how Oasis ever became as popular as they did. No single track makes sense - they’re just words put together because they rhyme. How can you walk ‘slowly down the hall’ but are still ‘faster than a cannonball’? What’s a ‘champagne supernova’ and if it’s in the sky then how are you ‘under a landslide’. So cross.
philevans626 wrote:
I think they admitted the second album included songs that weren't good enough for the first, and the third had songs that weren't good enough for either of the first two - so the downhill bit kind of makes sense. And it took Liam working with other songwriters to have the success he's enjoyed in the last couple of years.
That said, I did love these first two albums. Soundtrack of a lot of people's lives in the mid-90s.
One good album then all downhill after that. No idea how they've stayed so popular for so long.
I think they admitted the second album included songs that weren't good enough for the first, and the third had songs that weren't good enough for either of the first two - so the downhill bit kind of makes sense. And it took Liam working with other songwriters to have the success he's enjoyed in the last couple of years.
That said, I did love these first two albums. Soundtrack of a lot of people's lives in the mid-90s.
Interesting from Wikipedia (this 16th of January 2020)
Years active 1991–2009 2022-
Years active 1991–2009 2022-
philevans626 wrote:
And even this was overrated in my opinion.
One good album then all downhill after that. No idea how they've stayed so popular for so long.
And even this was overrated in my opinion.
One good album then all downhill after that. No idea how they've stayed so popular for so long.
More_Cowbell wrote:
Yea, sums it up for me.
Powerful and sweet tune! This should not be a personality contest.
Yea, sums it up for me.
Ihatethissong wrote:
You seem very into schadenfruede. Your posting name checks out, that's for sure. The h8 is strong.
How many albums do you have out?
MTV was hardly a force in 1995. It had long since become a reality show network. Your reference is terribly dated. Like your opinion.
You also seem blithely unaware that they were playing off of John Lennon comparing the Beatles to Jesus when they made that quote. A controversy from an earlier rock era that helped the Beatles grow their fan base in the same way that it helped Oasis at the time. Duh.
The Kinks famously feuded to the point of fisticuffs; the Stones came damn close on a few occasions (Charlie slugged Mick once); the Fogertys hated each other so much they broke up the band. Disagreements in rock bands are part of the process. Chuckles all around.
Also, they may be unpleasant characters to you and others (judging from this board) but, they are talented musicians whose careers are now in their 3rd decade. Both have recent albums out with their current bands. Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds album from last year was one of the best rock albums of the year.
You might try listening to it.
Thanks to the "MTV effect", These two asshats were catapulted to fame far beyond their merits or ability to handle said fame.
I remember having a chuckle whilst reading a quote from one of the brothers foreseeing their future legacy surpassing that of the The Beatles.
Had further chuckles reading about the brothers' frequent drunken disagreements devolving into fisticuffs.
I remember having a chuckle whilst reading a quote from one of the brothers foreseeing their future legacy surpassing that of the The Beatles.
Had further chuckles reading about the brothers' frequent drunken disagreements devolving into fisticuffs.
You seem very into schadenfruede. Your posting name checks out, that's for sure. The h8 is strong.
How many albums do you have out?
MTV was hardly a force in 1995. It had long since become a reality show network. Your reference is terribly dated. Like your opinion.
You also seem blithely unaware that they were playing off of John Lennon comparing the Beatles to Jesus when they made that quote. A controversy from an earlier rock era that helped the Beatles grow their fan base in the same way that it helped Oasis at the time. Duh.
The Kinks famously feuded to the point of fisticuffs; the Stones came damn close on a few occasions (Charlie slugged Mick once); the Fogertys hated each other so much they broke up the band. Disagreements in rock bands are part of the process. Chuckles all around.
Also, they may be unpleasant characters to you and others (judging from this board) but, they are talented musicians whose careers are now in their 3rd decade. Both have recent albums out with their current bands. Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds album from last year was one of the best rock albums of the year.
You might try listening to it.
mrselfdestruct wrote:
John Lennon was famously a prick but you so rarely hear people bringing it up. Probably because it is irrelevant to the music.
These guys are pricks, but they did have a few great songs.
John Lennon was famously a prick but you so rarely hear people bringing it up. Probably because it is irrelevant to the music.
curtlichter wrote:
It's funny you say that. I hated this band in the 90's. Now i think they were pretty damn good. Who knows.
Dear Bob,
I do believe the comments about this song (band) are the most contentious of any I've found on your wonderful station. And rightly so.
C
I do believe the comments about this song (band) are the most contentious of any I've found on your wonderful station. And rightly so.
C
It's funny you say that. I hated this band in the 90's. Now i think they were pretty damn good. Who knows.
So derivative it drains the word derivative of its derivativeness.
Too annoying ...
mrselfdestruct wrote:
Many more than a few !!
These guys are pricks, but they did have a few great songs.
Many more than a few !!
chyk5 wrote:
Thanks for giving me the Trump descriptor I've been searching high and low for!
Thanks for giving me the Trump descriptor I've been searching high and low for!
MrStatenIsle wrote:
Obviously and admittedly by them they were heavily influenced by them. But any time a band is called "The next Beatles"...is a kiss of death.
There will never be "The next Beatles".
Hard to believe they were compared with the Beatles or slated to be the next Beatles when they arrived. So bad.
Obviously and admittedly by them they were heavily influenced by them. But any time a band is called "The next Beatles"...is a kiss of death.
There will never be "The next Beatles".
It's quite a long song, isn't it.
One step below Vanilla Ice for originality
If you could write an algorithm that compared being an arsehole(s) to genius I suspect there is a pretty tight correlation.
Hard to believe they were compared with the Beatles or slated to be the next Beatles when they arrived. So bad.
What a boring song!
This song makes me love the RP fast forward feature.
Please no more Gobshitte Twins on Rp
Grayson wrote:
That is about all this song is really good for. It hasn't stood up well to the test of time, IMO. Argh....
My favorite Let's All Go To The High School Smoking Tree song ever.
That is about all this song is really good for. It hasn't stood up well to the test of time, IMO. Argh....
Like this song... but even like that last comment even more, hilarious!
Well I think it's a great tune from a great part of the music world, but it wouldn't do for us all to be the same, would it?
I used to karaoke this... but I didn't sing champagne supernover
These guys are pricks, but they did have a few great songs.
Terribly over-rated song and band!
Imma have to drop this down a notch. Something about the song, although it's probably more the Oasis bros themselves, just makes me wanna slap something.
My favorite Let's All Go To The High School Smoking Tree song ever.
Wank-a-sonic.
As much as I hate the Gallagher brothers huge egos and their all too public petty disputes, I have to admit they made some great music.
They are horrible megalomaniacs. They seem to think they are the new Beatles which they are not in any way in any shape, form or fashion.
TRC wrote:
Funny, I was thinking along similar lines - grade school kids writing poetry. So then now we know; 5th graders + poetry = stoned 10th graders! Still, I'll rate a 5 for the attempt at expressing....I don't know exactly what.
Reminds me of smoking too much pot in high school. I think they were both when they wrote this.
Funny, I was thinking along similar lines - grade school kids writing poetry. So then now we know; 5th graders + poetry = stoned 10th graders! Still, I'll rate a 5 for the attempt at expressing....I don't know exactly what.
Reminds me of smoking too much pot in high school. I think they were both when they wrote this.
I've compiled a "Best Oasis Comments" list for your reading pleasure:
-whiny snot nosed punkish poseurs.
-Toffee nosed wankers.
-the suckarama music selector must have kicked it.
-Cacophonous wretchedness.
-its a waste of electrons.
-utterly annoying.
-like a dental drill.... ucch...
-This tune is the best definition of ... SUCKO-BARFO.
-that whiney little putz is singing thru his nose again.
-whiny snot nosed punkish poseurs.
-Toffee nosed wankers.
-the suckarama music selector must have kicked it.
-Cacophonous wretchedness.
-its a waste of electrons.
-utterly annoying.
-like a dental drill.... ucch...
-This tune is the best definition of ... SUCKO-BARFO.
-that whiney little putz is singing thru his nose again.
Only good thing to come from this band of brothers was Wonderwall, and thank the lord Ryan Adams made the song GREAT
The cover looks like a meme. Could it be the first?
Awesome and great in concert. Still awesome summer evening music, driving to the beach side bars listening to this.
Duc1098 wrote:
Toffee nosed wankers.
Don’t think so! Loutish wankers perhaps but certainly not toffee nosed. I dismissed Oasis at the time because of their antics but with age I’ve now come to realise that much of their music was really rather good.
People may be tired of hearing it, I guess. What, a couple of times a year? That's how often I hear it. How could it possibly be rated so low? LOL
Duc1098 wrote:
Wankers - yes. Toffee nosed - well the usual meaning of that is snobbish, upperclass etc which they are clearly not. A variation of the meaning is to be 'disdainful' of those perceived as belonging to a lower class or lower talent than themselves - then maybe yes to that too.
Toffee nosed wankers.
Wankers - yes. Toffee nosed - well the usual meaning of that is snobbish, upperclass etc which they are clearly not. A variation of the meaning is to be 'disdainful' of those perceived as belonging to a lower class or lower talent than themselves - then maybe yes to that too.
look ma we made it
Duc1098 wrote:
Perhaps, but they put out some very good music.
Toffee nosed wankers.
Perhaps, but they put out some very good music.
Toffee nosed wankers.
Rocky Mountain High California
musikluvr wrote:
I think the "some Brits" you refer to are probably mainly English. It's a habit that gets up the noses of us Scots as well (at least a lot of the ones where I grew up). But you get over it, same way as I'm sure most of the English get over the way we speak.
Don't y'all just love RP - where somebody from the land that gave us George W Bush (and what he did for the English language) has a go (justifiably) at the way the English speak English.
Why do some Brits add an r on the end of words that end in a? So annoying. PSD>>
I think the "some Brits" you refer to are probably mainly English. It's a habit that gets up the noses of us Scots as well (at least a lot of the ones where I grew up). But you get over it, same way as I'm sure most of the English get over the way we speak.
Don't y'all just love RP - where somebody from the land that gave us George W Bush (and what he did for the English language) has a go (justifiably) at the way the English speak English.
thewiseking wrote:
justin4kick wrote:
Agree completely
I always thought that they were phoney, their public reality-TV type feuding between the brothers proved it
whiny snot nosed punkish poseurs.
justin4kick wrote:
Agree completely
I always thought that they were phoney, their public reality-TV type feuding between the brothers proved it
thewiseking wrote:
Agree completely
whiny snot nosed punkish poseurs.
Agree completely
So sick of this 90s shifty crap.
mardisoninnc wrote:
Yes, maybe once. Morning glory.
A great album. Even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
Yes, maybe once. Morning glory.