Can you afford to retire?
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 7, 2024 - 12:23am
Wordle - daily game
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 6, 2024 - 11:55pm
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Jun 6, 2024 - 8:39pm
NYTimes Connections
- geoff_morphini - Jun 6, 2024 - 8:29pm
Old timers, crosswords &
- BlueHeronDruid - Jun 6, 2024 - 7:08pm
Joe Biden
- kcar - Jun 6, 2024 - 5:54pm
June 2024 Photo Theme - Eyes
- fractalv - Jun 6, 2024 - 3:58pm
Artificial Intelligence
- johkir - Jun 6, 2024 - 3:57pm
Gotta Get Your Drink On
- Antigone - Jun 6, 2024 - 2:48pm
Snakes & streaming images. WTH is going on?
- kcar - Jun 6, 2024 - 1:25pm
Favorite Quotes
- Proclivities - Jun 6, 2024 - 12:48pm
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- oldviolin - Jun 6, 2024 - 12:35pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Jun 6, 2024 - 12:06pm
Economix
- black321 - Jun 6, 2024 - 11:31am
What's with the Sitar? ...and Robert Plant
- thisbody - Jun 6, 2024 - 11:16am
NASA & other news from space
- rgio - Jun 6, 2024 - 10:42am
songs that ROCK!
- thisbody - Jun 6, 2024 - 10:39am
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Jun 6, 2024 - 8:32am
Israel
- R_P - Jun 6, 2024 - 7:56am
Mixtape Culture Club
- ColdMiser - Jun 6, 2024 - 7:28am
Climate Change
- Red_Dragon - Jun 6, 2024 - 5:17am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Jun 6, 2024 - 5:00am
Radio Paradise Comments
- miamizsun - Jun 6, 2024 - 4:57am
Democratic Party
- kurtster - Jun 5, 2024 - 9:23pm
Name My Band
- Manbird - Jun 5, 2024 - 7:02pm
What makes you smile?
- Manbird - Jun 5, 2024 - 6:56pm
Republican Party
- Steely_D - Jun 5, 2024 - 3:35pm
Canada
- Beaker - Jun 5, 2024 - 1:58pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- dryan67 - Jun 5, 2024 - 12:11pm
the Todd Rundgren topic
- miamizsun - Jun 5, 2024 - 5:00am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- MrDill - Jun 5, 2024 - 2:26am
What Makes You Laugh?
- Steely_D - Jun 5, 2024 - 12:44am
What Are You Going To Do Today?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 4, 2024 - 9:47pm
Automotive Lust
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jun 4, 2024 - 9:28pm
Art Show
- Manbird - Jun 4, 2024 - 8:20pm
China
- R_P - Jun 4, 2024 - 7:33pm
Bad Poetry
- Isabeau - Jun 4, 2024 - 12:11pm
Classic TV Curiosities
- Isabeau - Jun 4, 2024 - 12:09pm
What's that smell?
- Isabeau - Jun 4, 2024 - 11:50am
Trump
- Red_Dragon - Jun 4, 2024 - 11:05am
Music Videos
- black321 - Jun 4, 2024 - 10:11am
Baseball, anyone?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 4, 2024 - 8:28am
Things You Thought Today
- thisbody - Jun 4, 2024 - 8:17am
Your First Albums
- Manbird - Jun 3, 2024 - 5:42pm
King Crimson
- Steely_D - Jun 3, 2024 - 2:25pm
2024 Elections!
- R_P - Jun 3, 2024 - 10:19am
Your favourite conspiracy theory?
- Beaker - Jun 3, 2024 - 8:00am
Beer
- Red_Dragon - Jun 3, 2024 - 5:20am
Ukraine
- R_P - Jun 2, 2024 - 3:07pm
Live Music
- buddy - Jun 1, 2024 - 3:39pm
RP on Twitter
- R_P - Jun 1, 2024 - 2:47pm
Football, soccer, futbol, calcio...
- thisbody - Jun 1, 2024 - 10:20am
What Did You See Today?
- Isabeau - May 31, 2024 - 1:15pm
ONE WORD
- thisbody - May 31, 2024 - 10:39am
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful
- Alchemist - May 30, 2024 - 6:58pm
Human Curated?
- Ipse_Dixit - May 30, 2024 - 2:55pm
Evolution!
- R_P - May 30, 2024 - 12:22pm
favorite love songs
- thisbody - May 30, 2024 - 11:25am
Sonos
- konz - May 30, 2024 - 10:26am
Fascism In America
- R_P - May 29, 2024 - 11:01pm
You might be getting old if......
- Bill_J - May 29, 2024 - 6:05pm
Science in the News
- black321 - May 29, 2024 - 11:56am
Roku App - Roku Asterisk Menu
- RPnate1 - May 29, 2024 - 11:15am
Geomorphology
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 29, 2024 - 10:56am
The Obituary Page
- Steve - May 29, 2024 - 5:49am
Notification bar on android
- tjux - May 28, 2024 - 10:26pm
Interviews with the artists
- dischuckin - May 28, 2024 - 1:33pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - May 28, 2024 - 12:02pm
RP Daily Trivia Challenge
- ScottFromWyoming - May 27, 2024 - 8:24pm
Poetry Forum
- Manbird - May 27, 2024 - 7:20pm
fortune cookies, says:
- thisbody - May 27, 2024 - 3:50pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - May 27, 2024 - 9:29am
First World Problems
- ColdMiser - May 27, 2024 - 7:33am
Funny Videos
- thisbody - May 27, 2024 - 7:20am
Internet connection
- thisbody - May 27, 2024 - 7:12am
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
Elsewhere »
Science in the News
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9, 10, 11 Next |
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 7:42pm |
|
helenofjoy wrote:This made my face hurt.
yes.
|
|
jadewahoo
Location: Puerto Viejo, Costa Rica Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 6:55pm |
|
beamends wrote: Or coffee.
|
|
beamends
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 3:26pm |
|
oldslabsides wrote:I bet this makes a wave, too Or coffee.
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 3:23pm |
|
helenofjoy wrote:This made my face hurt.
I forgot to mention: point the knife away from your face!
|
|
helenofjoy
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 3:22pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote: oldslabsides wrote:now wait a minute...What if this were filmed from above the trombone? Or from beneath; would the "shockwave" still be in the shape of an arc? Something about the perspective here just doesn't seem real to me. Yes. Shockwaves are a finite thickness, and what you see is the light bending as it passes thru the shockwave. From the side the light passes thru more of the shockwave along the leading surface of the shock than is does behind the leading surface on its way to you, so you see it in profile. Here's a way to think about it that might help: hold an imaginary half of a pumpkin in your hand with the guts all scooped out. It's a pretty much a uniform thickness. Now imagine you have a long pumpkin-carving knife you can poke thru the pumpkin, and poke it thru near the open end of the pumpkin, all the way across. It goes thru nearly perpendicular to the outer surface, which penetrates nearly the minimum amount of pumpkin possible while still getting thru both sides. Now poke it thru sideways across the bottom of the pumpkin. Since it goes thru the wall at a shallower angle it goes thru more pumpkin on its way out the other side. Poke it thru low enough and its whole trip thru will be inside the wall of the pumpkin. A ray of light taking that path will see the maximum amount of distortion from the differential index of refraction of the shock wave—not because it spent more time in the different index, but because it had farther to go before its path straightened out again when it reached undisturbed air on the other side. So rays of light along the leading surface of the shock will appear to show it in cross-section. This made my face hurt.
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 3:16pm |
|
oldslabsides wrote:now wait a minute...What if this were filmed from above the trombone? Or from beneath; would the "shockwave" still be in the shape of an arc? Something about the perspective here just doesn't seem real to me. Yes. Shockwaves are a finite thickness, and what you see is the light bending as it passes thru the shockwave. From the side the light passes thru more of the shockwave along the leading surface of the shock than is does behind the leading surface on its way to you, so you see it in profile. Here's a way to think about it that might help: hold an imaginary half of a pumpkin in your hand with the guts all scooped out. It's a pretty much a uniform thickness. Now imagine you have a long pumpkin-carving knife you can poke thru the pumpkin, and poke it thru near the open end of the pumpkin, all the way across. It goes thru nearly perpendicular to the outer surface, which penetrates nearly the minimum amount of pumpkin possible while still getting thru both sides. Now poke it thru sideways across the bottom of the pumpkin. Since it goes thru the wall at a shallower angle it goes thru more pumpkin on its way out the other side. Poke it thru low enough and its whole trip thru will be inside the wall of the pumpkin. A ray of light taking that path will see the maximum amount of distortion from the differential index of refraction of the shock wave—not because it spent more time in the different index, but because it had farther to go before its path straightened out again when it reached undisturbed air on the other side. So rays of light along the leading surface of the shock will appear to show it in cross-section.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 8:13am |
|
ptooey wrote:We're a little short on brass instruments, actually. I've got 2 guitars, a drum set, a piano, and a harmonica (oh, and I'm expecting a ukulele on Thursday .) The kids have an accordion and a cello. I bet this makes a wave, too
|
|
ptooey
Location: right behind you. no, over there. Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 8:05am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
Yeah, but what about the trombone?
We're a little short on brass instruments, actually. I've got 2 guitars, a drum set, a piano, and a harmonica (oh, and I'm expecting a ukulele on Thursday .) The kids have an accordion and a cello.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 8:02am |
|
ptooey wrote: Yeah, I've got a couple of old scientific surplus catalogs sitting at the house. I'll check into what they've got. It really doesn't look all that tough.
Yeah, but what about the trombone?
|
|
ptooey
Location: right behind you. no, over there. Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 7:58am |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: I thought that might be trouble $250 is the price for new. Talk to someone there about what you need: a mirror out of a trashed telescope, it can have some scratches, I doubt that will matter much. Yeah, I've got a couple of old scientific surplus catalogs sitting at the house. I'll check into what they've got. It really doesn't look all that tough.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 7:56am |
|
ptooey wrote: Dammit. Dammit, dammit, dammit.
*heads off to e-bay*
Edit: $250 for an 8" mirror. Ahh. Nope.
I thought that might be trouble $250 is the price for new. Talk to someone there about what you need: a mirror out of a trashed telescope, it can have some scratches, I doubt that will matter much.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 7:47am |
|
ptooey wrote: Dammit. Dammit, dammit, dammit.
*heads off to e-bay*
|
|
ptooey
Location: right behind you. no, over there. Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 7:44am |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: Dammit. Dammit, dammit, dammit. *heads off to e-bay* Edit: $250 for an 8" mirror. Ahh. Nope.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 7:27am |
|
oldslabsides wrote:now wait a minute...What if this were filmed from above the trombone? Or from beneath; would the "shockwave" still be in the shape of an arc? Something about the perspective here just doesn't seem real to me. The depth of field is so shallow that it essentially is showing you just a cross-section of the half-a-bubble wave. Nearer to or further from the lens is out of focus so it doesn't show up.
Edit: well I was on the right track crack. Schleiren photography note the link from there to Collimated light
A do-it-yourself guide to Schlieren photography
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 6:47am |
|
oldslabsides wrote:now wait a minute...What if this were filmed from above the trombone? Or from beneath; would the "shockwave" still be in the shape of an arc? Something about the perspective here just doesn't seem real to me. i think its because the wave will travel slower as it propagates out to the sides, kind of like waves turning the corner at the beach, presuming you have a beach with corners, that is..
|
|
oldviolin
Location: esse quam videri Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 6:41am |
|
oldslabsides wrote: yes, but the contact lens has an edge in addition to its convex side...
who said anythin' about hatin'?
But I see the edge. Don't you? just rattling your cage...
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 6:36am |
|
oldviolin wrote:
look at a contact lens from the side...any side, and it's the same. The shock wave is basicallythe same convex shape. maybe... stop hatin' on peoples horn bones will ya? yes, but the contact lens has an edge in addition to its convex side... who said anythin' about hatin'?
|
|
beamends
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 6:35am |
|
oldviolin wrote:
look at a contact lens from the side...any side, and it's the same. The shock wave is basicallythe same convex shape. maybe... stop hatin' on peoples horn bones will ya?
or the shock wave from an explosion, wherever you view from it's still dome shaped (in ideal conditions).
|
|
oldviolin
Location: esse quam videri Gender:
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 6:32am |
|
oldslabsides wrote:now wait a minute...What if this were filmed from above the trombone? Or from beneath; would the "shockwave" still be in the shape of an arc? Something about the perspective here just doesn't seem real to me. look at a contact lens from the side...any side, and it's the same. The shock wave is basicallythe same convex shape. maybe... stop hatin' on peoples horn bones will ya?
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
May 30, 2011 - 6:19am |
|
now wait a minute...What if this were filmed from above the trombone? Or from beneath; would the "shockwave" still be in the shape of an arc? Something about the perspective here just doesn't seem real to me.
|
|
|