21
- ScottFromWyoming - May 31, 2023 - 1:37pm
Climate Change
- black321 - May 31, 2023 - 1:10pm
Fascism In America
- ScottFromWyoming - May 31, 2023 - 12:54pm
Radio Paradise Comments
- islander - May 31, 2023 - 10:37am
Come join us in Eureka!
- Red_Dragon - May 31, 2023 - 10:24am
Wordle - daily game
- rgio - May 31, 2023 - 8:56am
Ukraine
- Lazy8 - May 31, 2023 - 8:07am
Get the Quote
- thisbody - May 31, 2023 - 7:53am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - May 31, 2023 - 7:39am
Mixtape Culture Club
- miamizsun - May 31, 2023 - 7:24am
Russia
- westslope - May 31, 2023 - 6:56am
Things You Thought Today
- Bill_J - May 30, 2023 - 7:28pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- GeneP59 - May 30, 2023 - 4:07pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - May 30, 2023 - 1:25pm
Outstanding Covers
- Steely_D - May 30, 2023 - 9:35am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- renaultr17 - May 29, 2023 - 9:50pm
What Did You Do Today?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 29, 2023 - 4:52pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - May 29, 2023 - 11:18am
Helpful emergency signs
- Proclivities - May 29, 2023 - 7:14am
Eversolo DMP-A6 streamer and RP?
- William - May 28, 2023 - 8:36pm
MQA in administration
- William - May 28, 2023 - 8:27pm
Stream stopping at promo
- William - May 28, 2023 - 8:18pm
What's your favorite quote?
- maryte - May 28, 2023 - 9:12am
Counting with Pictures
- Proclivities - May 28, 2023 - 4:59am
Ask for a tea
- DaveInSaoMiguel - May 28, 2023 - 3:29am
Graphic designers, ho's!
- Manbird - May 27, 2023 - 5:43pm
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today...
- ScottN - May 27, 2023 - 5:28pm
THREE WORDS
- oldviolin - May 27, 2023 - 12:52pm
FOUR WORDS
- oldviolin - May 27, 2023 - 11:42am
ONE WORD
- oldviolin - May 27, 2023 - 11:30am
TWO WORDS
- oldviolin - May 27, 2023 - 11:28am
China
- miamizsun - May 27, 2023 - 8:04am
Animal Resistance
- Red_Dragon - May 27, 2023 - 7:46am
Little known information...maybe even facts
- miamizsun - May 27, 2023 - 7:24am
Guns
- Red_Dragon - May 27, 2023 - 6:57am
RightWingNutZ
- kcar - May 26, 2023 - 8:09pm
You're welcome, manbird.
- Bill_J - May 26, 2023 - 6:00pm
In My Room
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 26, 2023 - 4:17pm
The Lincoln quote ... wasn't from Lincoln
- Proclivities - May 26, 2023 - 1:19pm
Live Music
- Steely_D - May 26, 2023 - 10:51am
It seemed like a good idea at the time
- Red_Dragon - May 26, 2023 - 10:35am
Nuclear power - saviour or scourge?
- miamizsun - May 26, 2023 - 8:31am
A Picture paints a thousand words
- Proclivities - May 26, 2023 - 8:00am
The Daily complaint forum, Please complain or be Happy
- sunybuny - May 26, 2023 - 7:08am
Gas or Electric?
- ColdMiser - May 26, 2023 - 6:19am
Need help - anyone got a copy of Aristotle's Politics?
- lily34 - May 26, 2023 - 5:48am
Republican Party
- westslope - May 26, 2023 - 2:30am
Word Association - temporary
- oldviolin - May 25, 2023 - 1:34pm
Florida
- R_P - May 25, 2023 - 11:22am
What's playing
- lily34 - May 25, 2023 - 9:17am
BRING OUT YOUR DEAD
- oldviolin - May 25, 2023 - 9:15am
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - May 25, 2023 - 9:03am
Happy Birthday!
- lily34 - May 25, 2023 - 8:40am
NASA & other news from space
- miamizsun - May 25, 2023 - 7:51am
The Obituary Page
- lily34 - May 25, 2023 - 5:17am
Musky Mythology
- rgio - May 25, 2023 - 4:49am
Canada
- Red_Dragon - May 24, 2023 - 6:38pm
What Are You Grateful For?
- Antigone - May 24, 2023 - 4:06pm
Graphic designers, ho!
- RedTopFireBelow - May 24, 2023 - 12:43pm
LeftWingNutZ
- Proclivities - May 24, 2023 - 10:29am
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- oldviolin - May 24, 2023 - 10:19am
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- GeneP59 - May 24, 2023 - 8:16am
Manbird's Episiotomy Stitch Licking Clinic - KEEP OUT
- miamizsun - May 24, 2023 - 5:22am
Questions.
- oldviolin - May 23, 2023 - 7:59pm
Name My Band
- oldviolin - May 23, 2023 - 7:58pm
mood
- oldviolin - May 23, 2023 - 7:57pm
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- oldviolin - May 23, 2023 - 2:55pm
Baseball, anyone?
- Proclivities - May 23, 2023 - 12:19pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 23, 2023 - 11:40am
What The Hell Buddy?
- oldviolin - May 23, 2023 - 10:53am
Floyd forum
- kurtster - May 22, 2023 - 7:26pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 22, 2023 - 4:31pm
Eclectic Sound-Drops
- oldviolin - May 22, 2023 - 1:58pm
Quick! I need a chicken...
- oldviolin - May 22, 2023 - 1:24pm
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- Beez - May 22, 2023 - 10:29am
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
NASA & other news from space
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 Next |
shmgeggie

Location: Spokane, WA Gender:  
|
Posted:
Aug 5, 2011 - 2:55pm |
|
aflanigan wrote:All you trekheads out there (including the original) will of course remember the episode that broached the subject of whether humans were essential to space exploration, THE ULTIMATE COMPUTER. Predictably, the plot involves demonstrating that computers are not fit to pilot star ships without humans. My opinion is that, given the basic assumptions of the star trek series (a universe populated by numerous sentient life forms strewn about the galaxies), it probably would be impossible to avoid sending humans into space. We've been sending diplomats across borders for millenia; it's hard to imagine that an advanced robotic computer might be developed that could replace humans in tact and judgement any time soon (maybe something like the replicants from Blade Runner?). In terms of the need for humans to pilot exploration ships in the real universe, where for all intents and purposes we're the only sentient life around, Captain Kirk (or "Captain Dunsail", as Commodore Wesley calls Kirk) has, I believe, already been made obsolete. Frank Herbert's "Destination: Void" series puts a very interesting spin on this question. Well worth a read, especially "The Jesus Incident."
|
|
K_Love

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Aug 5, 2011 - 12:55pm |
|
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — NASA launched a new solar-powered spacecraft on a mission to Jupiter on Friday. The robotic explorer, named Juno, was atop an unmanned Atlas rocket. The launch had to be delayed for a short time while a problem with a helium system was investigated and a boat was removed from the launch zone. The launch happened at 12:25 p.m. It will take Juno five years to reach Jupiter, the largest planet in the solar system. The spacecraft will be powered by three huge solar panels. It will be the farthest any solar-powered craft has ever traveled. Previous Jupiter probes have relied on nuclear energy. Jupiter is believed to be the oldest planet in the solar system.Astronomers hope to figure out the recipe for making planets by uncovering the ingredients of this gas giant. Juno will spend at least one year circling Jupiter's poles.
|
|
aflanigan

Location: At Sea Gender:  
|
Posted:
Aug 5, 2011 - 12:41pm |
|
Beaker wrote: aflanigan wrote:All you trekheads out there (including the original) will of course remember the episode that broached the subject of whether humans were essential to space exploration, THE ULTIMATE COMPUTER. Predictably, the plot involves demonstrating that computers are not fit to pilot star ships without humans. My opinion is that, given the basic assumptions of the star trek series (a universe populated by numerous sentient life forms strewn about the galaxies), it probably would be impossible to avoid sending humans into space. We've been sending diplomats across borders for millenia; it's hard to imagine that an advanced robotic computer might be developed that could replace humans in tact and judgement any time soon (maybe something like the replicants from Blade Runner?). In terms of the need for humans to pilot exploration ships in the real universe, where for all intents and purposes we're the only sentient life around, Captain Kirk (or "Captain Dunsail", as Commodore Wesley calls Kirk) has, I believe, already been made obsolete. fyt
Captain Dunsel Not a typo. Dunsel is how transcript writers heard it, but I believe dunsail is the correct spelling ( cf stunsail, pronounced "stuns'l")
|
|
islander

Location: Seattle Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 25, 2011 - 8:26am |
|
hobiejoe wrote:Crikey, that is an extraordinary trajectory. I'd always imagined a somewhat more glider-like gentle descent. And as for the "airglow", well... it's well known that in favourable conditions on an open sea a lucky sailor will see the "green flash" across the western horizon moments after the sun has set. Not seen one yet  You can actually see them over land as well. We occasionally get them from the deck here with the sun setting over the peninsula. It has to be VERY dry though, and almost no surrounding clouds.
|
|
Umberdog

Location: In my body. Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2011 - 3:36pm |
|
This is a cool picture too. Anyone wanna take a swim in the Bahamas? We'll need a diving board.
|
|
hobiejoe

Location: Still in the tunnel, looking for the light. Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2011 - 3:28pm |
|
Zep wrote: Atlantis returns to Earth, as seen from the International Space Station. Details here. "The green band of light in the background is called "airglow." Airglow is a luminous bubble that surounds our entire planet, decorating the top of the atmosphere with aurora-like color. Although airglow resembles the aurora borealis, its underlying physics is different. Airglow is caused by an assortment of chemical reactions in the upper atmosphere driven mainly by solar ultraviolet radiation; auroras, on the other hand, are prompted by gusts of solar wind." Crikey, that is an extraordinary trajectory. I'd always imagined a somewhat more glider-like gentle descent. And as for the "airglow", well... it's well known that in favourable conditions on an open sea a lucky sailor will see the "green flash" across the western horizon moments after the sun has set. Not seen one yet
|
|
Umberdog

Location: In my body. Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2011 - 3:12pm |
|
Zep wrote: Atlantis returns to Earth, as seen from the International Space Station. Details here. "The green band of light in the background is called "airglow." Airglow is a luminous bubble that surounds our entire planet, decorating the top of the atmosphere with aurora-like color. Although airglow resembles the aurora borealis, its underlying physics is different. Airglow is caused by an assortment of chemical reactions in the upper atmosphere driven mainly by solar ultraviolet radiation; auroras, on the other hand, are prompted by gusts of solar wind." I could write a sci-fi novel about that evil dark cloud in the upper right corner. Very interesting picture.
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Dumbf*ckistan 
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2011 - 3:10pm |
|
Zep wrote:Atlantis returns to Earth, as seen from the International Space Station. Details here. "The green band of light in the background is called "airglow." Airglow is a luminous bubble that surounds our entire planet, decorating the top of the atmosphere with aurora-like color. Although airglow resembles the aurora borealis, its underlying physics is different. Airglow is caused by an assortment of chemical reactions in the upper atmosphere driven mainly by solar ultraviolet radiation; auroras, on the other hand, are prompted by gusts of solar wind." very cool pic.
|
|
Zep

Location: Funkytown 
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2011 - 3:06pm |
|
 Atlantis returns to Earth, as seen from the International Space Station. Details here. "The green band of light in the background is called "airglow." Airglow is a luminous bubble that surounds our entire planet, decorating the top of the atmosphere with aurora-like color. Although airglow resembles the aurora borealis, its underlying physics is different. Airglow is caused by an assortment of chemical reactions in the upper atmosphere driven mainly by solar ultraviolet radiation; auroras, on the other hand, are prompted by gusts of solar wind."
|
|
aflanigan

Location: At Sea Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 2:22pm |
|
justlistening wrote: I shared Coaxial's link with a few people here at work and one of them sent me this photo. Thought I'd share. Gene Roddenbery came to our highschool in 1976 when I was a freshman. He screened a blooper reel from Star Trek and fielded questions about the upcoming (rumored) Star Trek movie (it was still three years away). Still haven't figured out how they arranged for him to visit our dinky school. My graduating class only had 120 kids in it - I don't think we had more than about 500 total. It was a highlight though and he was a nice guy. He stuck around and spoke to people in the hallway after the presentation. All you trekheads out there (including the original) will of course remember the episode that broached the subject of whether humans were essential to space exploration, THE ULTIMATE COMPUTER. Predictably, the plot involves demonstrating that computers are not fit to pilot star ships without humans. My opinion is that, given the basic assumptions of the star trek series (a universe populated by numerous sentient life forms strewn about the galaxies), it probably would be impossible to avoid sending humans into space. We've been sending diplomats across borders for millenia; it's hard to imagine that an advanced robotic computer might be developed that could replace humans in tact and judgement any time soon (maybe something like the replicants from Blade Runner?). In terms of the need for humans to pilot exploration ships in the real universe, where for all intents and purposes we're the only sentient life around, Captain Kirk (or "Captain Dunsail", as Commodore Wesley calls Kirk) has, I believe, already been made obsolete.
|
|
aflanigan

Location: At Sea Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 1:51pm |
|
Xeric wrote: Yeah. But. No kid was ever inspired to become an astronaut (or an aerospace engineer or a poet) by a datastream from a robot. The reasons to do personed flight may indeed be more emotional than rational: that fact does not necessarily tender those reasons invalid.
OK, but that's why we have guys like Richard Branson. He can afford to spend extravagantly on manned spaceflight projects for romantic reasons! We really can't.
|
|
aflanigan

Location: At Sea Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 1:42pm |
|
bokey wrote: Wow.Just wow.We should stagnate as a nation and a race in order to squander our resources on being world cops and bombing other countries that haven't done a frigging thing to us,rather than try to advance ourselves?
Where do you see me advocating the above? Wasting money comes in many forms, including fighting pointless wars. The point is, sending human flesh into space is inefficient; we can employ contractors and generate economic growth by being smart about utilizing our space flight capability and produce much more meaningful "science" along the lines of projects like Pioneer, Voyager, Mariner, etc. You get much more bang for your buck regarding advancing the frontiers of science and knowledge when you stop insisting on sending humans into space to evacuate their bowels and vomit in zero gravity. Stagnating is what we basically have been doing with our inefficient approach to space exploration.
|
|
GeneP59

Location: On the edge of tomorrow looking back at yesterday. Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 1:32pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:Cool. It says 2014 "or later" now... I never looked up who Ad Astra was. I've seen the name and just skimmed over it. Things are still awesome up there. The guy who's the head of the company is a former astronaut for NASA with a PHD in Science. Hope his technology works.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 1:23pm |
|
GeneP59 wrote:There was supposed to be a test fire of a new plasma engine on the Space Station next year and I never heard anything more about it. This new engine is suppose to knock 6 months off the trip to Mars down to a 39-day mission to Mars. If this is feasible, the new technology will make going to Mars and further a return trip not a one way ride. Cool. It says 2014 "or later" now... I never looked up who Ad Astra was. I've seen the name and just skimmed over it. Things are still awesome up there.
|
|
GeneP59

Location: On the edge of tomorrow looking back at yesterday. Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 1:00pm |
|
There was supposed to be a test fire of a new plasma engine on the Space Station next year and I never heard anything more about it. This new engine is suppose to knock 6 months off the trip to Mars down to a 39-day mission to Mars. If this is feasible, the new technology will make going to Mars and further a return trip not a one way ride.
|
|
justlistening

Location: So. California Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 12:42pm |
|
Proclivities wrote: "...besides, it's cold as hell" (That simile always bothered me - hell is supposed to be hot.) I see your point about setting up an outpost or settlement; that'll probably happen someday. I just figure picking the first guy could be a little troublesome. You're probably right about a lot of the westward expansion people not expecting to come back - the same is probably true for many of the early trans-Atlantic sailors.
Not to mention dust storms that blanket the planet and radiation due to lack of atmosphere. (got your continued reference though)
|
|
Proclivities

Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 12:36pm |
|
Zep wrote: The mission would not be to strand the astronauts, but to give them enough resources to start a new outpost. Humans have done this on faith for generations. It's likely many who went west during the U.S. expansion thought very little about returning.
Think too of the opportunity to start all over again, another common theme in history.
Still, I get your point. 200 million miles is a lot of road. And Mars ain't the kind of place to raise a kid.
"...in fact, it's cold as hell" (That simile always bothered me - I thought hell is supposed to be hot.)
I see your point about setting up an outpost or settlement; that'll probably happen someday. I just figure picking the first guy could be a little troublesome. You're probably right about a lot of the westward expansion people not expecting to come back - the same is probably true for many of the early trans-Atlantic sailors.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 12:36pm |
|
Zep wrote: The mission would not be to strand the astronauts, but to give them enough resources to start a new outpost. Humans have done this on faith for generations. It's likely many who went west during the U.S. expansion thought very little about returning.
*pictures Kevin Costner making coffee for a little green man*
|
|
hippiechick

Location: topsy turvy land Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 12:24pm |
|
Zep wrote: The mission would not be to strand the astronauts, but to give them enough resources to start a new outpost. Humans have done this on faith for generations. It's likely many who went west during the U.S. expansion thought very little about returning.
Think too of the opportunity to start all over again, another common theme in history.
Still, I get your point. 200 million miles is a lot of road. And Mars ain't the kind of place to raise a kid.
It's a dirty job, but someone's got to do it. (Got your Rocket Man ref)
|
|
Zep

Location: Funkytown 
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 12:22pm |
|
Proclivities wrote:Well, one might wonder as to the mental health of someone who is willing to travel 200 million miles to be stranded on some cold, little planet. It's a little beyond what test pilots do. The mission would not be to strand the astronauts, but to give them enough resources to start a new outpost. Humans have done this on faith for generations. It's likely many who went west during the U.S. expansion thought very little about returning. Think too of the opportunity to start all over again, another common theme in history. Still, I get your point. 200 million miles is a lot of road. And Mars ain't the kind of place to raise a kid.
|
|
|