Isabeau wrote: 
Yeah, okay ...


There is an endless supply of this stuff.

 kurtster wrote:

Well, at least its with the syntax of a high school graduate instead of third grade Trump speak. Perhaps that's why you're perceiving her as incoherent.

 kurtster wrote:
Says so much about you Kurt.  You're a true patriot.

 Steely_D wrote: 
Well with a little luck the "Big Guy" may get arrested soon.  Then Kamala will be the first "blonde" POTUS.

 kurtster wrote:

VP Harris' insistence of speaking incoherently in public is a cultural appropriation of blondes ...

 kurtster wrote:

How to backtrack without saying you are backtracking

 rgio wrote:
He's a troll, that's it.

 kurtster wrote:
"I'm happy that you have no concerns for the affected."

Coming from you and your disregard for the suffering of the Ukrainians at the hands of Putin's illegal invasion, that's f#$^in' rich. 

 Isabeau wrote:
Absurd seems to be Kurts MO today.

On the gun thread, he blames a prosecutor (inspired by George Soros?) for allowing the Michigan State shooter to buy a gun legally because she plea-bargained a sentence years ago...

then here...

It's not Trump's fault that he rescinded legislation passed under Obama that required trains carrying hazardous materials to be fitted with ECP braking systems.  He put it in the Biden thread, but it's you lefty nut-jobs who always wanna blame someone (and we know who).

Neither of these is a singular cause... but holding others accountable only matters when a democrat is to blame... facts be damned.

 kurtster wrote:

Absolutely absurd to blame any single individual for this, especially a President. Congress is in charge of Interstate Commerce and Industry regulations. Just take a wild guess at which party is thoroughly against any further regulations? 
(Hope you or loved ones aren't affected.)

 kurtster wrote:
well you posted it in the joe biden thread, so the words that did come with the pic spun it a certain way dontcha think

hope you & your friends and family don't get any adverse affects

 Steely_D wrote: 
No, totally warranted.  I just posted a picture of a major event. An event local to me, with many friends and family much closer to it than me. No spin.  One picture is worth a thousand words.

The first words chosen were to blame Trump. And nothing else.  My response was appropriate.

 kurtster wrote:
Unwarranted assertion, unless you mean it literally that you're happy.

 dischuckin wrote: 
Uh, no.  I live 50 miles away as the crow flies.  Just checked the google map.  I live within the 50 mile radius of "concern".  Fortunately, generally upwind.

I'm happy that you have no concerns for the affected.  Neither does Joe or the DOT secretary.

Carry on.

 kurtster wrote: uh, posting that here cuz joe needed to re-tighten the regulations that trump relaxed?

 Steely_D wrote:

 Isabeau wrote:
Was a joke. Like “don’t make me have a visual about the old man and porn stars.” </explaining>

 Steely_D wrote:

How Selective you are in your 'concerns'. Very telling.