[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Wordle - daily game - maryte - Dec 3, 2022 - 10:34am
 
Twitter and democracy - rgio - Dec 3, 2022 - 9:48am
 
Today in History - Steve - Dec 3, 2022 - 9:43am
 
USA! USA! USA! - sirdroseph - Dec 3, 2022 - 7:28am
 
Joe Biden - sirdroseph - Dec 3, 2022 - 4:21am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Dec 2, 2022 - 9:42pm
 
The Obituary Page - ScottFromWyoming - Dec 2, 2022 - 3:38pm
 
NEED A COMPUTER GEEK! - ScottFromWyoming - Dec 2, 2022 - 3:35pm
 
design • creative - Proclivities - Dec 2, 2022 - 1:06pm
 
COVID-19 - sirdroseph - Dec 2, 2022 - 11:28am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - fractalv - Dec 2, 2022 - 11:23am
 
NFL Badlosers & Bawlbabys Bitchwack - rgio - Dec 2, 2022 - 11:22am
 
Play the Blues - thisbody - Dec 2, 2022 - 11:02am
 
RightWingNutZ - Lazy8 - Dec 2, 2022 - 8:33am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - Jelani - Dec 2, 2022 - 7:23am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Dec 2, 2022 - 5:27am
 
I want an iPhone!!! - miamizsun - Dec 2, 2022 - 4:38am
 
China - miamizsun - Dec 2, 2022 - 4:35am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Coaxial - Dec 1, 2022 - 7:39pm
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Dec 1, 2022 - 6:16pm
 
What makes you smile? - Bill_J - Dec 1, 2022 - 4:19pm
 
Talking Heads - ScottN - Dec 1, 2022 - 11:01am
 
Sweden | Sverige - Steely_D - Dec 1, 2022 - 10:39am
 
Russia - R_P - Dec 1, 2022 - 10:22am
 
If not RP, what are you listening to right now? - kurtster - Dec 1, 2022 - 8:41am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Dec 1, 2022 - 7:12am
 
Canada Eh??? - Steely_D - Dec 1, 2022 - 5:36am
 
Live Music - Kaw - Dec 1, 2022 - 5:30am
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - thisbody - Dec 1, 2022 - 4:13am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - miamizsun - Dec 1, 2022 - 4:06am
 
Films you're excited about. - Red_Dragon - Nov 30, 2022 - 6:19pm
 
Future of Human Race (in 500 years) - Red_Dragon - Nov 30, 2022 - 3:28pm
 
Roku RP Now has all the features of my phone - RPnate1 - Nov 30, 2022 - 3:08pm
 
Take Me To Your Leader - oldviolin - Nov 30, 2022 - 2:48pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 30, 2022 - 2:13pm
 
What Are You Grateful For? - GeneP59 - Nov 30, 2022 - 1:41pm
 
What Puts You In the Christmas Mood? - GeneP59 - Nov 30, 2022 - 1:34pm
 
Name My Band - GeneP59 - Nov 30, 2022 - 1:25pm
 
The Grateful Dead - black321 - Nov 30, 2022 - 1:21pm
 
Religion - thisbody - Nov 30, 2022 - 10:42am
 
New Music - Proclivities - Nov 30, 2022 - 7:30am
 
Why no Toto? - danielh - Nov 30, 2022 - 5:26am
 
Prayer in C (Robin Schultz Mix) -- Love is Like Oxygen? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 29, 2022 - 10:22pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 29, 2022 - 10:15pm
 
Republican Party - kurtster - Nov 29, 2022 - 9:47pm
 
Twitter's finest moment - R_P - Nov 29, 2022 - 7:27pm
 
News of the Weird - Steely_D - Nov 29, 2022 - 6:33pm
 
Britain - Red_Dragon - Nov 29, 2022 - 12:59pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Nov 29, 2022 - 12:59pm
 
List your Concerts ! - thisbody - Nov 29, 2022 - 12:07pm
 
Ukraine - sirdroseph - Nov 29, 2022 - 11:18am
 
Renewed My Support - gaffer57 - Nov 29, 2022 - 9:59am
 
It's the economy stupid. - black321 - Nov 29, 2022 - 8:52am
 
Can I use my ratings to create a playlist? - eyke - Nov 29, 2022 - 6:22am
 
Things You Thought Today - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Nov 28, 2022 - 9:37pm
 
Guns - R_P - Nov 28, 2022 - 8:22pm
 
KUDOS for BillG - miamizsun - Nov 28, 2022 - 4:48pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - R_P - Nov 28, 2022 - 3:24pm
 
Amazon Products (May Contain Spam) - Steely_D - Nov 28, 2022 - 9:11am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - Bill_J - Nov 28, 2022 - 6:11am
 
Is it just me? - graham.olsen.1745 - Nov 28, 2022 - 4:00am
 
How to submit songs for consideration? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 27, 2022 - 9:20pm
 
Canada - Steely_D - Nov 27, 2022 - 6:33pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Red_Dragon - Nov 27, 2022 - 6:22pm
 
Just Wrong - Red_Dragon - Nov 27, 2022 - 2:59pm
 
New RP Website! (2022) - ScottFromWyoming - Nov 27, 2022 - 10:53am
 
Arctic Refuge - miamizsun - Nov 27, 2022 - 10:48am
 
2022 Elections - R_P - Nov 26, 2022 - 9:48pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 26, 2022 - 9:45pm
 
Manbird's Episiotomy Stitch Licking Clinic - KEEP OUT - oldviolin - Nov 26, 2022 - 7:47pm
 
♥ ♥ ♥ Vote For Pie ♥ ♥ ♥ - KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 26, 2022 - 5:03pm
 
Old iPhone with iOS 12.5 ? - jarro - Nov 26, 2022 - 3:25pm
 
Your Handy Home Censorship Kit - Manbird - Nov 26, 2022 - 1:05pm
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Nov 26, 2022 - 5:59am
 
Democratic Party - sirdroseph - Nov 26, 2022 - 3:55am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Climate Change Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 115, 116, 117
Post to this Topic
Rod

Rod Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 23, 2009 - 12:45pm

 Zep wrote:


Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion?

I did a master's thesis on it.

 
Do you know anything about this one? It sounds very promising. Not temperature driven, but it uses slow water currents to create energy. I originally posetd this in the Solar/WindGeothermal...thread.
 
Vivace Energy Technology Harnesses Vortex Hydro-Energy



HazzeSwede

HazzeSwede Avatar

Location: Hammerdal
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 23, 2009 - 12:26pm

Google might save the planet !
is about greenland ice 15 hours ago.

 

"The message on the science is that we know a lot more than we did in 1997 and it's all negative," said Eileen Claussen, president of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. "Things are much worse than the models predicted."




HazzeSwede

HazzeSwede Avatar

Location: Hammerdal
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 23, 2009 - 12:20pm

 Zep wrote:


Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion?

I did a master's thesis on it.

    As I understand this was a new way not done before,been looking for the TV clip found other stuff instead.
    Greenland ice is going much faster,new reports today,and I can report that the internet is slow right now for us here,found a link to original english site but can't come throu,will try in the morning when you guys are asleep.


Zep

Zep Avatar



Posted: Nov 23, 2009 - 11:51am

 HazzeSwede wrote:
On my TV morning show this morning;The Norwegians has come up with a new way to make electricity.
It will be on full scale in a year.I have been watching BBC and CNN for something in english,nothing yet
but I am sure there will be.
To complex for me to even try to relay but the working prototype uses sweet water and salt water only.
Some way in the gizmo they got it driving a turbine,but hey,he was prolly just trollin for money for his
experiment now takin place only in the Caymans.{#Arghhh}
 

Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion?

I did a master's thesis on it.
HazzeSwede

HazzeSwede Avatar

Location: Hammerdal
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 23, 2009 - 10:28am

On my TV morning show this morning;The Norwegians has come up with a new way to make electricity.
It will be on full scale in a year.I have been watching BBC and CNN for something in english,nothing yet
but I am sure there will be.
To complex for me to even try to relay but the working prototype uses sweet water and salt water only.
Some way in the gizmo they got it driving a turbine,but hey,he was prolly just trollin for money for his
experiment now takin place only in the Caymans.{#Arghhh}
rosedraws

rosedraws Avatar

Location: close to the edge
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 23, 2009 - 10:03am

 Welly wrote:


 
 

"we're melting.  Love, the glaciers". 

Welly

Welly Avatar

Location: Lotusland
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 23, 2009 - 9:52am


Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 23, 2009 - 9:18am

 dionysius wrote:
Good piece, Zep. Now, let's hear the "refutations" (of course there won't be; this will simply be ignored).
 
I'm seeing a lot of things being ignored, mostly the reprehensible behavior exhibited in the emails.

I make my living with applied science. The whole architecture of science requires skepticism, challenge, and honest response. A scientist is expected to respond to a challenge with evidence, not authority. What the hacked information shows is a group of people so committed to their conclusions that they will say anything to convince people they're right—hide contradictory data, refuse to talk to anyone challenging their methods or conclusion, and to simply make things up.

If you live and work outside the sciences it may be hard to imagine how deeply offensive that is. This is despicable behavior for a scientist. In my world that kind of behavior would wreck my credibility—no one would take anything I said seriously again.

Of course, that doesn't make the conclusions they so badly want us to share wrong, but if you want to argue with the authority of science you have to use the rigor of science. If they're right the evidence, honestly presented, will show it. If they're wrong no amount of celebrity endorsements will make them right.

The hand-wringing about this is misplaced, and the response of circling the wagons and attacking opponents is counterproductive. Maybe that helps the authors of these emails preserve their positions, but it isn't helping the cause of understanding climate change. The folks at UEA need to decide what their role is here: are they scientists, committed to a process of discovery of the truth, or are they political agitators pressing for a cause? They've shown they can't be both.

dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 23, 2009 - 8:21am

Good piece, Zep. Now, let's hear the "refutations" (of course there won't be; this will simply be ignored).
HazzeSwede

HazzeSwede Avatar

Location: Hammerdal
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 23, 2009 - 8:01am

    Bravo,,Zep !!!!{#Clap}
Zep

Zep Avatar



Posted: Nov 23, 2009 - 7:56am

Leaked email climate smear was a PR disaster for UEA

Source.

There was no evidence of conspiracy among climate scientists in the leaked emails – so why was the University of East Anglia's response so pathetic?

The leaked emails from the University of East Anglia contained no evidence of conspiracy.

The lay public, when presented with confusing data and competing arguments about climate change, deploy the mental shortcut of believing the people they most trust. Trust in the communicator is therefore crucial.

Unfortunately the three main climate change communicators: politicians, journalists and environmental campaigners, are among the least trusted people in society – fighting it out for bottom place in the ranking with lawyers and car salesmen. No one would pay any attention to them at all if they were not drawing on the aquifer of public trust in scientists.

But climate scientists have always misunderstood the dynamic of public belief and trust. They assume that belief will be built on their data and that public trust is merited by their authority. With the exception of a few outstanding communicators, they often make no attempt to speak to deeper values or make an emotional connection with the public – indeed they see that as contrary to their professional independence.

Climate change deniers have always understood this. They use language that is designed to appeal to deeper values (such as freedom, independence, progress). The narrative they tell of being determined (and even persecuted) free-thinkers, standing against the tide of oppressive and self-interested conformity is designed to create an aura of integrity and trustworthiness.

The recent hacking of the servers of the University of East Anglia can only be understood within this landscape of competing appeals to public trust. The denial industry (and hordes of climate nerds) has trawled through these emails and found sentences which, when removed from context, support their storyline that climate science is being deliberately distorted and exaggerated for a mixed bag of self-interested and politicised ends.

But you could find anything in here. I looked and found lots of references to lunch and fun, 94 to hate, 31 to love. Generally, though, the emails are extremely focused, technical, and, dare I say it, really dull. As noted on realclimate.org, the emails contain "no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to 'get rid of the MWP', no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the falsifying of data, and no 'marching orders' from our socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords."

But this is hardly the point. This is an orchestrated smear campaign and does not require balance or context. The speed with which the emails have been cut apart and fed into existing storylines is remarkable. At the very least the UEA email campaign is an application of dirty political tactics to climate change campaigning.

I suspect it goes further than that. The storyline is too clever, the timing on the brink of Copenhagen and the US climate bill too convenient. I wait with interest to find out how these emails were obtained.

The UEA response has been frankly pathetic. It was informed by Real Climate of the hack on 17 November but only reacted two days later when journalists caught on to the story. It refused to confirm whether the emails were accurate or not and, for a long time, refused to comment at all.

Now, in typical scientist fashion, it seeks to argue the data rationally. The UEA website states that "the selective publication of some stolen emails and other papers taken out of context is mischievous and cannot be considered a genuine attempt to engage with this issue in a responsible way". Mischievous? Irresponsible? What naughty pixies.

Then the Climate Research Unit director, Prof Phil Jones, focuses on one of quotes: "I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline." For the smear campaign it is only those key words "trick" and "hide" that count – the rest can be made into anything it wants. Jones ignores this and responds with a detailed technical explanation of the passage with reference to the original graphs. It's like responding to someone calling you a bastard by showing them your birth certificate.

One can only imagine that the UEA's communications team is totally out of its depth. A less charitable conclusion is that they are defending the interests of UEA and are not concerned about (or have not understood) the damage to climate science.

I believe that Jones should speak to every journalist who calls, go on the offensive and defend his science. He ought to clearly state that he is not prepared to have his hard-working and committed colleagues around the world defamed or slandered by the kinds of people who illegally hack into computers. This is a desperate, last-ditch tactic by fanatics who have lost the rational debate.

Sadly, due in part to the lacklustre response, I am sure that these wretched emails have now entered permanently into the mythology of climate denial. Scientists are going to have to be a lot more savvy and on the ball in future.

• George Marshall is the founder and director of projects at the Climate Outreach and Information Network. He posts regularly to the blog climatedenial.org.




Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 115, 116, 117