Live Music
- oldviolin - Jul 14, 2025 - 8:28pm
But Why?
- oldviolin - Jul 14, 2025 - 8:14pm
Baseball, anyone?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:30pm
Trump
- islander - Jul 14, 2025 - 6:10pm
Wordle - daily game
- islander - Jul 14, 2025 - 6:08pm
Israel
- R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 5:52pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- bobrk - Jul 14, 2025 - 3:56pm
NY Times Strands
- ptooey - Jul 14, 2025 - 3:53pm
Economix
- R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 3:27pm
Immigration
- R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 3:11pm
Name My Band
- oldviolin - Jul 14, 2025 - 1:48pm
Climate Change
- R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 12:42pm
NYTimes Connections
- Proclivities - Jul 14, 2025 - 12:11pm
The Marie Antoinette Moment...
- R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 11:35am
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 11:16am
Fox Spews
- R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 10:52am
What is the meaning of this?
- rgio - Jul 14, 2025 - 10:44am
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Jul 14, 2025 - 10:36am
Fascism In America
- Red_Dragon - Jul 14, 2025 - 9:59am
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- oldviolin - Jul 14, 2025 - 8:40am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jul 14, 2025 - 8:04am
Why atheists swallow,
- black321 - Jul 14, 2025 - 8:00am
USA! USA! USA!
- ColdMiser - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:57am
On Life as Art- heard it on KTRT 95.7
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:56am
Comics!
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:53am
Music Videos
- black321 - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:51am
Beyond mix
- ericb - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:01am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Jul 14, 2025 - 6:31am
July 2025 Photo Theme - Stone
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 14, 2025 - 3:05am
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore
- buddy - Jul 13, 2025 - 5:49pm
M.A.G.A.
- R_P - Jul 13, 2025 - 3:53pm
Are they married yet? YES THEY ARE!
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 13, 2025 - 3:16pm
Infinite cat
- Isabeau - Jul 13, 2025 - 11:37am
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - Jul 13, 2025 - 11:35am
What Makes You Laugh?
- GeneP59 - Jul 13, 2025 - 10:10am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Jul 12, 2025 - 9:16pm
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - Jul 12, 2025 - 8:39pm
Europe
- R_P - Jul 12, 2025 - 6:30pm
Democratic Party
- R_P - Jul 12, 2025 - 1:37pm
A motivational quote
- steeler - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:58pm
Beyond...
- GeneP59 - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:35pm
Protest Songs
- R_P - Jul 11, 2025 - 12:38pm
True Confessions
- oldviolin - Jul 11, 2025 - 11:56am
Jess Roden - legendary UK vocalist - and "Seven Windows" ...
- J_C - Jul 11, 2025 - 11:22am
It seemed like a good idea at the time
- ptooey - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:10am
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:13pm
TV shows you watch
- R_P - Jul 10, 2025 - 5:31pm
Wasted Money
- GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 5:22pm
Rock mix / repitition
- walk2k - Jul 10, 2025 - 4:31pm
How's the weather?
- GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 3:21pm
Random Solutions - Random Advice
- oldviolin - Jul 10, 2025 - 10:11am
Spambags on RP
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:02am
misheard lyrics
- GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 6:30am
New Song Submissions system
- Teja - Jul 10, 2025 - 3:36am
TEXAS
- Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2025 - 5:57pm
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote')
- black321 - Jul 9, 2025 - 11:33am
Republican Party
- Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2025 - 7:50am
Outstanding Covers
- oldviolin - Jul 8, 2025 - 9:29pm
Trump Lies™
- R_P - Jul 8, 2025 - 7:14pm
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jul 8, 2025 - 5:43pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Jul 8, 2025 - 11:45am
Love & Hate
- oldviolin - Jul 8, 2025 - 8:15am
Anti-War
- R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 6:45pm
Environment
- R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 5:38pm
(Big) Media Watch
- R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 12:04pm
The Grateful Dead
- black321 - Jul 7, 2025 - 11:17am
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 7, 2025 - 8:59am
Russia
- Red_Dragon - Jul 7, 2025 - 7:39am
Triskele and The Grateful Dead
- geoff_morphini - Jul 6, 2025 - 10:33pm
Hey Baby, It's The 4th O' July
- GeneP59 - Jul 6, 2025 - 9:42pm
Customize a shirt with my favorite album
- 2644364236 - Jul 6, 2025 - 7:20pm
Those Lovable Policemen
- R_P - Jul 6, 2025 - 10:56am
Beer
- SeriousLee - Jul 6, 2025 - 6:54am
Iran
- R_P - Jul 5, 2025 - 9:01pm
What are you doing RIGHT NOW?
- Coaxial - Jul 5, 2025 - 6:48pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Climate Change
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 118, 119, 120 ... 132, 133, 134 Next |
HazzeSwede

Location: Hammerdal Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 15, 2009 - 3:05am |
|
Gee, what a surprise that most of the global warming deniers are from the #1 country on the emissions list!
|
|
Inamorato

Location: Twin Cities Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 15, 2009 - 2:39am |
|
MrsHobieJoe wrote:Gee, what a surprise that most of the global warming deniers are from the #1 country on the emissions list!
|
|
MrsHobieJoe

Location: somewhere in Europe Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 15, 2009 - 2:23am |
|
World carbon emissions, by country: can the Copenhagen climate summit bring these down?The Copenhagen climate change summit has started. Now, the US is no longer number one emitter of carbon dioxide, having been overtaken by China in these latest figures. But when did it happen?
  Copenhagen summit: Carbon emissions around the world. Click image for bigger picture. Scroll down page for pdf More of the article from the Guardian including the table
|
|
Welly

Location: Lotusland Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 8:55am |
|
Environment Canada hit by 'damn clever' climate stuntJane Taber - Globe and Mail December 14, 2009
Canada is red-faced at the Copenhagen climate-change conference as a result of a spoof news release purporting to be from Environment Canada announcing Canada was bringing in bold new emissions reduction targets. The authentic-looking release, which was announced on a fake Jim Prentice Twitter account, caught many observers off guard and a fake story about it landed on a fake Wall Street Journal website - all an elaborate ruse to embarrass Canada, which is being considered the "dirty-old man" of the conference for its intransigence on negotiating better targets. “In a major development coming three days before the final round of UN climate change negotiations in Copenhagen, and responding to the recent concerns expressed by the G77 bloc of countries, Canada’s Attache for Environment and Planning announced today an ambitious plan for a new climate change framework that answers vital concerns voiced by developing nations,” says the fake release. It says that Canada plans to bring in new targets of 40 per cent below 1990 by 2020 - way more ambitious than what the real Mr. Prentice has come to Copenhagen with. The prank continued with another legitimate-looking statement from Environment Canada attempting to contain the damage: “One hour ago, a spoof press release targeted Canada in order to generate hurtful rumours and mislead the Conference of Parties on Canada’s positions on climate change, and to damage Canada’s standing with the international business community,” it says. It says that the spoof was “unfortunately” reported in major international outlets. It says the targets and all statements in the release are “unequivocally false.” But that statement, too, proved to be a fake. The elaborate and damaging spoof comes just a week after Greenpeace activists embarrassed the government by climbing the roof of Parliament buildings to protest Canada’s leadership on his issue. Dimitri Soudas, spokesman for Prime Minister Stephen Harper, was unimpressed. "More time should be dedicated to playing a constructive role instead of childish pranks," he said in an email to The Globe. The story raised hackles in Copenhagen, with tensions running high between Mr. Soudas, who is travelling with Mr. Prentice, and Steven Guilbeault, a Quebec environmentalist with Équiterre who is as well-known in that province as David Suzuki’s is in the rest of Canada. Mr. Soudas, who is not sure who wrote the releases, said Mr. Guilbeault was forwarding the fake announcements around and then had camped in front of where the Canadian delegation is located. Mr. Guilbeault denies any involvement in the prank. The Prime Minister's spokesman added that the Environment Minister is meeting with his provincial colleagues and is also to meet with the U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu later. A real press release, Mr. Soudas said, will be issued from that meeting. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May, who is also in Copenhagen, says she doesn’t know who is behind the spoof but says it is clearly “an attempt to draw attention to Canada and force Canada to go to the media and say ‘no, we haven’t budged.'” She doesn’t believe that any Canadian did it, although she says it was “damn clever.”
|
|
rosedraws

Location: close to the edge Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 8:25am |
|
|
|
hippiechick

Location: topsy turvy land Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 8:17am |
|
|
|
Lazy8

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 8:11am |
|
HazzeSwede wrote: beggin your pardon,,not so much any more,,new batteries,elevating water,heating the same,saving in the ground etc.
He's quite correct. The energy density of the methods you mention is terrible (they take up a lot of space) and they are very leaky. That low energy density imposes a terrible environmental cost too—look at the acreage drowned by hydroelectric reservoirs. And look at the energy required to make a lithium-ion battery. What does work, and works very well, is "grid storage". If you have power plants that can change their output level quickly (like, say, a nuke plant) you use that to fill in the gaps when the other methods slow down. Then you don't bother trying to store energy, just generate what you need.
|
|
HazzeSwede

Location: Hammerdal Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 6:21am |
|
Zep wrote: The G77 could make a lot of political trouble for the rest of the world, that's for sure. It's going to depend on where China aligns herself.
The new world leader !  (they bought my favorite car brand from GM,,  today !) SAAB ! The management of GM,,,SUCK !
|
|
Zep

Location: Funkytown 
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 6:00am |
|
HazzeSwede wrote:Told you Zep,,war is coming !
The G77 could make a lot of political trouble for the rest of the world, that's for sure. It's going to depend on where China aligns herself.
|
|
HazzeSwede

Location: Hammerdal Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 5:57am |
|
Told you Zep,,war is coming !
|
|
HazzeSwede

Location: Hammerdal Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 5:55am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: loved the osmosis plant you drew to our attention! Well,THANK YOU ! And thank the "Norrbaggarna" for their hard work ! It will pay off,,any place where fresh water meets salt,one can have a plant = a small nuc one.
|
|
Zep

Location: Funkytown 
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 5:53am |
|
From the Beeb... Too early to say what it means for the convention itself, and for hammering out an agreement. Climate negotiations 'suspended' By Richard Black - Environment correspondent, BBC News website, Copenhagen Negotiations at the UN climate summit have been suspended after developing countries withdrew their co-operation. Delegations were angry at what they saw as moves by the Danish host government to sideline talks on more emission cuts under the Kyoto Protocol. As news spread around the conference centre, activists chanted "We stand with Africa - Kyoto targets now". Informal talks continue, and the UN climate convention head said the formal agenda should resume in the afternoon. Blocs representing poor countries vulnerable to climate change have been adamant that rich nations must commit to emission cuts beyond 2012 under the Kyoto Protocol. But the EU and the developed world in general has promoted the idea of an entirely new agreement, replacing the protocol. Developing countries fear they would lose many of the gains they made when the Kyoto agreement was signed in 1997. Previously during this meeting - formally called the Conference of the Parties (COP) 15 - developing countries have accused the Danish chairs of ignoring their concerns. "The president of the COP (Danish climate minister Connie Hedegaard) is absolutely committed to violate any democratic processes," said G77 chief negotiator Lumumba Di-Aping as he explained the latest development. Last week, the Pacific island nation of Tuvalu forced a suspension after insisting that proposals to amend the UN climate convention and Kyoto Protocol be debated in full. 'Losing time' At a news conference earlier in the day, UK Climate Secretary Ed Miliband said that for the developed world to commit to further cuts under the Kyoto Protocol would be "irresponsible for the climate". He said it would leave some of the world's biggest emitters without targets for cutting emissions. Many developing countries have been arguing for a "twin track" approach, whereby countries with existing targets under the Kyoto Protocol (all developed nations except the US) stay under that umbrella, with the US and major developing economies making their carbon pledges under a new protocol. Kim Carstensen, director of the global climate initiative with environment group WWF, said that much more movement was needed on the Kyoto Protocol negotiations here. "The point is being made very loudly that African countries and the wider G77 bloc will not accept non-action on the Kyoto Protocol, and they're really afraid that a deal has been stitched up behind their backs," he told BBC News. While understanding the G77 position, he said the suspension could affect progress towards a deal. "We're losing time, and that's a serious matter; because for every minute we lose on one issue, the chances of getting to the bottom of the next issue diminish." The Danish government has yet to make any formal response; but Australian Climate Minister Penny Wong described the suspension as "regrettable". Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the UN climate change convention, predicted that the negotiations would get back on track in the early afternoon. "The vast majority of countries here want to see the continuation of the Kyoto Protocol," he said. "I'm not aware that any countries are trying to block anything." An African bloc walkout during prepatory talks in Barcelona in November proved unpopular with other developing countries, in particular some small island nations.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 5:41am |
|
HazzeSwede wrote: I rate this post a # 9 !   loved the osmosis plant you drew to our attention!
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 5:39am |
|
Xeric wrote: Pointing out that one of the glaring gaps in our energy technology is storage.
 whoever solves that problem will become a very rich person.
|
|
HazzeSwede

Location: Hammerdal Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 5:38am |
|
Xeric wrote: Pointing out that one of the glaring gaps in our energy technology is storage.
beggin your pardon,,not so much any more,,new batteries,elevating water,heating the same,saving in the ground etc.
|
|
Xeric

Location: Montana Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 5:27am |
|
MrsHobieJoe wrote:
I was just going to post "yes". The nuclear power thing is the "gap" because wind, solar etc don't (at the moment) have the on/off capacity for flexibility that is needed.
Pointing out that one of the glaring gaps in our energy technology is storage.
|
|
HazzeSwede

Location: Hammerdal Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 4:19am |
|
MrsHobieJoe wrote:
I was just going to post "yes". The nuclear power thing is the "gap" because wind, solar etc don't (at the moment) have the on/off capacity for flexibility that is needed.
Not only that,,will also,if I have the correct info,burn the waste we already have and the time to make it "safe" will be 1000 years instead 100 000 !
|
|
MrsHobieJoe

Location: somewhere in Europe Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 4:02am |
|
HazzeSwede wrote: I rate this post a # 9 !  I was just going to post "yes". The nuclear power thing is the "gap" because wind, solar etc don't (at the moment) have the on/off capacity for flexibility that is needed.
|
|
HazzeSwede

Location: Hammerdal Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 3:20am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:4Gen nuclear power plants. I honestly do not see any viable future without them and I am speaking as an environmentalist.
I am all in favor of using every possible alternative energy source that returns a net energy gain and does not pollute the environment:
Wind Solar Tide Osmosis
But I think we are kidding ourselves big time if we think we are going to generate enough energy from these sources in the short time left.
(BTW that short time left is NOT the time from now until resources run out. The short time left is the time between now and the time it becomes economically unfeasible to exploit the few remaining natural resources).
Moreover, the energy supplied by 4Gen nuclear will hopefully give us enough time to get sufficient fully renewable sources (like osmosis plants, solar, etc) up and running.
As for all the climate change deniers: I don't really care whether you think the climate is changing or not. What bugs me most about your world view is somehow the tacit assumption you seem to make that the future will somehow carry on just like the past with us able to buy in everything we need if we can't produce it ourselves.
This totally ignores the fact that we have come to close to exhausting the bountiful resources of our own countries (I mean, how long would the States survive if imports stopped tomorrow?) and are actually buying in the deficit from poorer countries eager to sell it to us. Fine, worked so far, but what if these "poorer" countries are no longer willing to sell it to us? What if they enter the world market as net buyers of resources?
I mean seriously, the current first world lifestyle is simply unsustainable for 6 billion people. This is a fact. Either we change the way we live or we throw our ideals out the window and buy bigger guns to keep 80% of the world in abject poverty. This is what really drives me loopy. Not the whole climate change scenario.
I rate this post a # 9 !
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2009 - 2:04am |
|
4Gen nuclear power plants. I honestly do not see any viable future without them and I am speaking as an environmentalist.
I am all in favor of using every possible alternative energy source that returns a net energy gain and does not pollute the environment:
Wind Solar Tide Osmosis
But I think we are kidding ourselves big time if we think we are going to generate enough energy from these sources in the short time left.
(BTW that short time left is NOT the time from now until resources run out. The short time left is the time between now and the time it becomes economically unfeasible to exploit the few remaining natural resources).
Moreover, the energy supplied by 4Gen nuclear will hopefully give us enough time to get sufficient fully renewable sources (like osmosis plants, solar, etc) up and running.
As for all the climate change deniers: I don't really care whether you think the climate is changing or not. What bugs me most about your world view is somehow the tacit assumption you seem to make that the future will somehow carry on just like the past with us able to buy in everything we need if we can't produce it ourselves.
This totally ignores the fact that we have come to close to exhausting the bountiful resources of our own countries (I mean, how long would the States survive if imports stopped tomorrow?) and are actually buying in the deficit from poorer countries eager to sell it to us. Fine, worked so far, but what if these "poorer" countries are no longer willing to sell it to us? What if they enter the world market as net buyers of resources?
I mean seriously, the current first world lifestyle is simply unsustainable for 6 billion people. This is a fact. Either we change the way we live or we throw our ideals out the window and buy bigger guns to keep 80% of the world in abject poverty. This is what really drives me loopy. Not the whole climate change scenario.
|
|
|