[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Mar 1, 2024 - 8:12pm
 
March 2024 Photo Theme - Many - oldviolin - Mar 1, 2024 - 8:05pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Coaxial - Mar 1, 2024 - 6:29pm
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Mar 1, 2024 - 5:50pm
 
Great guitar faces - Manbird - Mar 1, 2024 - 5:23pm
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - Manbird - Mar 1, 2024 - 5:20pm
 
Israel - R_P - Mar 1, 2024 - 3:58pm
 
HALF A WORLD - buddy - Mar 1, 2024 - 3:37pm
 
February 2024 Photo Theme - Water - Antigone - Mar 1, 2024 - 3:30pm
 
Joe Biden - steeler - Mar 1, 2024 - 2:23pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Mar 1, 2024 - 2:04pm
 
NYTimes Connections - rgio - Mar 1, 2024 - 1:35pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - Mar 1, 2024 - 12:45pm
 
ONE WORD - oldviolin - Mar 1, 2024 - 11:21am
 
Irony 101 - oldviolin - Mar 1, 2024 - 11:20am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Mar 1, 2024 - 11:07am
 
What Makes You Sad? - oldviolin - Mar 1, 2024 - 10:44am
 
Outstanding Covers - oldviolin - Mar 1, 2024 - 10:38am
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Mar 1, 2024 - 10:34am
 
Name My Band - lily34 - Mar 1, 2024 - 8:37am
 
Wordle - daily game - geoff_morphini - Mar 1, 2024 - 8:37am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - Mar 1, 2024 - 8:35am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Mar 1, 2024 - 7:23am
 
Today in History - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 1, 2024 - 5:52am
 
Play the Blues - oldviolin - Feb 29, 2024 - 12:05pm
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - Feb 29, 2024 - 10:02am
 
Russia - R_P - Feb 29, 2024 - 9:49am
 
trouble with cache block filling on Android 9 - nhm5 - Feb 29, 2024 - 9:43am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - GeneP59 - Feb 29, 2024 - 7:57am
 
The Obituary Page - lily34 - Feb 29, 2024 - 5:39am
 
New Music - pete_shakey - Feb 29, 2024 - 5:04am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Feb 28, 2024 - 9:51pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - DaveInSaoMiguel - Feb 28, 2024 - 2:03pm
 
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse - geoff_morphini - Feb 28, 2024 - 1:15pm
 
Announcements being clipped - larvenz - Feb 28, 2024 - 6:40am
 
China - R_P - Feb 27, 2024 - 10:34pm
 
Ways to Listen to RP on WiiM Plus - rexswain - Feb 27, 2024 - 3:22pm
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Feb 27, 2024 - 2:46pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - ColdMiser - Feb 27, 2024 - 8:25am
 
NASA & other news from space - Beaker - Feb 27, 2024 - 6:10am
 
In My Room - oldviolin - Feb 27, 2024 - 6:02am
 
Road Trip! - Proclivities - Feb 27, 2024 - 4:54am
 
ANSWERS - miamizsun - Feb 27, 2024 - 4:25am
 
Trump - islander - Feb 26, 2024 - 3:52pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Feb 26, 2024 - 3:10pm
 
RightWingNutZ - kcar - Feb 26, 2024 - 2:22pm
 
Total solar eclipse playlist - Isabeau - Feb 26, 2024 - 12:13pm
 
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands) - Babylon - Feb 26, 2024 - 11:39am
 
Audio Sampling Rates - William - Feb 26, 2024 - 9:12am
 
Artificial Intelligence - islander - Feb 26, 2024 - 7:21am
 
OUR CATS!! - DaveInSaoMiguel - Feb 26, 2024 - 7:16am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - pete_shakey - Feb 25, 2024 - 10:31pm
 
Guns - islander - Feb 25, 2024 - 6:34am
 
Coffee - kurtster - Feb 24, 2024 - 9:27pm
 
It's all good fun until... - oldviolin - Feb 24, 2024 - 2:10pm
 
The Secret Combination - oldviolin - Feb 24, 2024 - 1:50pm
 
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today... - oldviolin - Feb 24, 2024 - 1:30pm
 
Caching to Apple watch quit working - jmenzies - Feb 24, 2024 - 7:01am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - KurtfromLaQuinta - Feb 23, 2024 - 9:16pm
 
If not RP, what are you listening to right now? - westslope - Feb 23, 2024 - 3:43pm
 
Favorite Quotes - oldviolin - Feb 23, 2024 - 1:42pm
 
Florida - thisbody - Feb 23, 2024 - 10:30am
 
Is there a help forum? - amyarnelle - Feb 22, 2024 - 3:22pm
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - oldviolin - Feb 22, 2024 - 1:06pm
 
Today, I learned... - Steely_D - Feb 21, 2024 - 9:52pm
 
Best guitarists - skyguy - Feb 21, 2024 - 4:00pm
 
NEED A COMPUTER GEEK! - geoff_morphini - Feb 21, 2024 - 12:45pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - geoff_morphini - Feb 21, 2024 - 11:44am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Steely_D - Feb 21, 2024 - 11:06am
 
WikiLeaks - R_P - Feb 21, 2024 - 10:43am
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Feb 21, 2024 - 8:14am
 
NY Times Spelling Bee - Proclivities - Feb 21, 2024 - 7:49am
 
Best Song Comments. - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Feb 21, 2024 - 7:46am
 
Other Medical Stuff - Antigone - Feb 21, 2024 - 6:49am
 
Sunrise, Sunset - sunybuny - Feb 21, 2024 - 5:25am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Anti-War Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 26, 27, 28  Next
Post to this Topic
beamends

beamends Avatar



Posted: Jun 16, 2011 - 5:01am

 Romulus wrote:
the first causality of war is truth.

 
"Lies get round the world while truth is still getting it's boots on".

Romulus

Romulus Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 16, 2011 - 4:51am

the first causality of war is truth.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 16, 2011 - 4:45am

f'n insane, and if you think this is ok or that we should tolerate this type of murder, time for a moral check up. we absolutely shouldn't put up with this. ignoring the law and intentionally taking innocent life isn't acceptable. somebody needs to speak up and stop this, like right now. please make a phone call.

Yet another illegal war — now in Yemen

"Contrary to false denials, the U.S., under the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner, has been bombing Yemen for the last two years, including one attack using cluster bombs that killed dozens of civilians. But what's new is that this will be a CIA drone attack program that is a massive escalation over prior bombing campaigns." Know what you're paying for when you give the government money.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 6, 2011 - 8:04pm

 buzz wrote:

chill out dude. Obama has a Nobel Peace Prize. or was that the Noble Pizza Prize?



let's see, guns or pie  {#Think} 

i'm all for obama eating pie!



miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 6, 2011 - 7:54pm

 oldslabsides wrote:

...and people think I'm weird.

 
you may be weird, however you clearly grasp that moral and ethical behavior is good.

you also understand that if violent governments make enough rules, we'll all eventually break one and feel the brunt of a well armed government gang.

i wish more people understood your " peaceful weirdness"

buzz

buzz Avatar

Location: up the boohai


Posted: Jun 6, 2011 - 7:46pm

 miamizsun wrote:
just how bad does all of this BS have to get before we speak up?

US says dropping bombs is not war, but guessing a computer password is
June 5, 2011

By Ethan A. Huff - Natural News

The US government sure has an interesting way of defining war these days. Just a few months after the Obama administration played word games with the public by insisting that air strikes in Libya were just "kinetic military action," not acts of war, the Pentagon has now come on the record stating that it will treat all acts of cyber-hacking against the US as "acts of war."

The announcement came on the heels of a supposed cyber-attack that occurred a few weeks ago against defense contractor Lockheed Martin. Officials say when hacking incidents like this occur in the future, retaliation in the form of reverse cyber-attacks, economic sanctions, and even "military strike" may take place.

"A response to a cyber-incident or attack on the US would not necessarily be a cyber-response," said Col. Dave Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman. "All appropriate options would be on the table." A White House statement also said the US plans to "respond to hostile acts in cyberspace as we would to any other threat to our country," implying that computer hackers could soon face retaliatory attacks by the US military.

So when the US decides to invade foreign nations, often times without necessary congressional approval, it is just a simple act of exerting kinetic energy. But when a computer hacker correctly guesses a password and breaches the security protocols of the US government or one of its contracted companies, this is an act of war. And so it goes in the arbitrary world of the military-industrial complex, where definitions of war are applied only when it benefits the corporate oligarchy.

In truth, this latest cyber fear mongering out of the Pentagon is just another excuse for those running the US government to widen the scope of those it considers to be terrorists and enemies of the state. And now that the announcement has been made, you can expect to hear about many more "cyber-attacks" that will predicate convenient excuses to launch new kinetic military actions against nations, groups, and perhaps even fellow American citizens.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-...

 
chill out dude. Obama has a Nobel Peace Prize. or was that the Noble Pizza Prize?
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jun 6, 2011 - 7:41pm

 miamizsun wrote:
just how bad does all of this BS have to get before we speak up?

US says dropping bombs is not war, but guessing a computer password is
June 5, 2011

By Ethan A. Huff - Natural News

The US government sure has an interesting way of defining war these days. Just a few months after the Obama administration played word games with the public by insisting that air strikes in Libya were just "kinetic military action," not acts of war, the Pentagon has now come on the record stating that it will treat all acts of cyber-hacking against the US as "acts of war."

The announcement came on the heels of a supposed cyber-attack that occurred a few weeks ago against defense contractor Lockheed Martin. Officials say when hacking incidents like this occur in the future, retaliation in the form of reverse cyber-attacks, economic sanctions, and even "military strike" may take place.

"A response to a cyber-incident or attack on the US would not necessarily be a cyber-response," said Col. Dave Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman. "All appropriate options would be on the table." A White House statement also said the US plans to "respond to hostile acts in cyberspace as we would to any other threat to our country," implying that computer hackers could soon face retaliatory attacks by the US military.

So when the US decides to invade foreign nations, often times without necessary congressional approval, it is just a simple act of exerting kinetic energy. But when a computer hacker correctly guesses a password and breaches the security protocols of the US government or one of its contracted companies, this is an act of war. And so it goes in the arbitrary world of the military-industrial complex, where definitions of war are applied only when it benefits the corporate oligarchy.

In truth, this latest cyber fear mongering out of the Pentagon is just another excuse for those running the US government to widen the scope of those it considers to be terrorists and enemies of the state. And now that the announcement has been made, you can expect to hear about many more "cyber-attacks" that will predicate convenient excuses to launch new kinetic military actions against nations, groups, and perhaps even fellow American citizens.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-...

 
...and people think I'm weird.


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 6, 2011 - 7:35pm

just how bad does all of this BS have to get before we speak up?

US says dropping bombs is not war, but guessing a computer password is
June 5, 2011

By Ethan A. Huff - Natural News

The US government sure has an interesting way of defining war these days. Just a few months after the Obama administration played word games with the public by insisting that air strikes in Libya were just "kinetic military action," not acts of war, the Pentagon has now come on the record stating that it will treat all acts of cyber-hacking against the US as "acts of war."

The announcement came on the heels of a supposed cyber-attack that occurred a few weeks ago against defense contractor Lockheed Martin. Officials say when hacking incidents like this occur in the future, retaliation in the form of reverse cyber-attacks, economic sanctions, and even "military strike" may take place.

"A response to a cyber-incident or attack on the US would not necessarily be a cyber-response," said Col. Dave Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman. "All appropriate options would be on the table." A White House statement also said the US plans to "respond to hostile acts in cyberspace as we would to any other threat to our country," implying that computer hackers could soon face retaliatory attacks by the US military.

So when the US decides to invade foreign nations, often times without necessary congressional approval, it is just a simple act of exerting kinetic energy. But when a computer hacker correctly guesses a password and breaches the security protocols of the US government or one of its contracted companies, this is an act of war. And so it goes in the arbitrary world of the military-industrial complex, where definitions of war are applied only when it benefits the corporate oligarchy.

In truth, this latest cyber fear mongering out of the Pentagon is just another excuse for those running the US government to widen the scope of those it considers to be terrorists and enemies of the state. And now that the announcement has been made, you can expect to hear about many more "cyber-attacks" that will predicate convenient excuses to launch new kinetic military actions against nations, groups, and perhaps even fellow American citizens.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-...


thefoodoflove

thefoodoflove Avatar

Location: Sydney
Gender: Male


Posted: May 23, 2011 - 10:59am

 miamizsun wrote:
Revealing the Roots of U.S. Wars

America's denial of the roots of 9/11 is not a unique phenomenon in U.S. history, according to Ivan Eland, director of the Independent Institute's Center on Peace & Liberty. Although Osama Bin Laden told the world why he attacked-he detested specific U.S. policies in the Middle East-Americans did not want to hear this, just as they wished not to learn about U.S. policies that precipitated other security crises.

Like the citizens of many other countries, Americans believe that their government is blameless when it comes to taking up arms against other peoples: wars are simply thrust upon their government, which they absolve of any responsibility for helping to create the conditions that precipitated the crises. The pattern, Eland argues in his latest op-ed, can be found in the popular perception of the causes of the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, the Civil War, the Battle of Little Bighorn, the Spanish-American War, World War I, World War II, the Vietnam War, the Iran hostage crisis, and the U.S. invasion of Grenada.

Americans need to better learn their history-and to see what their government does in their name. Were they to do so, they would learn scores of unacknowledged truths, such as that the War of 1812 was instigated by congressional "war hawks" who sought to grab land from Canada, that the Mexican-American War was precipitated by President James Polk's blockade of the Rio Grande, and that the attack on Pearl Harbor resulted from the United States cutting off oil and other vital resources to Japan. "American history vindicates the old saying that ‘truth is the first casualty of war,' Eland writes, "but the passage of time should allow a republic to undertake a more honest and dispassionate examination of historical events. It rarely does, with truth being swept under the rug in favor of assuming uncaused indignities.

 

"Unprovoked' Attacks, From 1812 to 9/11 by Ivan Eland (5/11/11)

The Empire Has No Clothes: U.S. Foreign Policy Exposed, by Ivan Eland

Recarving Rushmore: Ranking the Presidents on Peace, Prosperity, and Liberty, by Ivan Eland

Partitioning for Peace: An Exit Strategy for Iraq, by Ivan Eland

 

 

 



 


Now that is refreshing i have been so tired of initial Bush lies, "they hate our freedoms" being the extent of debate in the US over the last 10 years. What happened to, " know your enemy"?
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: May 23, 2011 - 10:32am

 Beaker wrote:

You misspelled Republicans.
 


meower

meower Avatar

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe
Gender: Female


Posted: May 23, 2011 - 10:31am

 Beaker wrote:

You misspelled Republicans.
 


hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: May 23, 2011 - 7:00am

War, what is it good for? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

95% of the world just wants to make a living, raise their family in peace and be left the HELL alone. The other 5% fucks everything up and wants us to be a part of it.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: May 23, 2011 - 6:54am

Revealing the Roots of U.S. Wars

America's denial of the roots of 9/11 is not a unique phenomenon in U.S. history, according to Ivan Eland, director of the Independent Institute's Center on Peace & Liberty. Although Osama Bin Laden told the world why he attacked-he detested specific U.S. policies in the Middle East-Americans did not want to hear this, just as they wished not to learn about U.S. policies that precipitated other security crises.

Like the citizens of many other countries, Americans believe that their government is blameless when it comes to taking up arms against other peoples: wars are simply thrust upon their government, which they absolve of any responsibility for helping to create the conditions that precipitated the crises. The pattern, Eland argues in his latest op-ed, can be found in the popular perception of the causes of the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, the Civil War, the Battle of Little Bighorn, the Spanish-American War, World War I, World War II, the Vietnam War, the Iran hostage crisis, and the U.S. invasion of Grenada.

Americans need to better learn their history-and to see what their government does in their name. Were they to do so, they would learn scores of unacknowledged truths, such as that the War of 1812 was instigated by congressional "war hawks" who sought to grab land from Canada, that the Mexican-American War was precipitated by President James Polk's blockade of the Rio Grande, and that the attack on Pearl Harbor resulted from the United States cutting off oil and other vital resources to Japan. "American history vindicates the old saying that ‘truth is the first casualty of war,' Eland writes, "but the passage of time should allow a republic to undertake a more honest and dispassionate examination of historical events. It rarely does, with truth being swept under the rug in favor of assuming uncaused indignities.

 

"Unprovoked' Attacks, From 1812 to 9/11 by Ivan Eland (5/11/11)

The Empire Has No Clothes: U.S. Foreign Policy Exposed, by Ivan Eland

Recarving Rushmore: Ranking the Presidents on Peace, Prosperity, and Liberty, by Ivan Eland

Partitioning for Peace: An Exit Strategy for Iraq, by Ivan Eland

 

 

 


Umberdog

Umberdog Avatar

Location: In my body.
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 31, 2011 - 7:56pm

 miamizsun wrote:
Must watch this....7 countries in 5 years


 
That's just another sound-byte taken out of context!</sarcasm> *rolls eyes* 
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 31, 2011 - 6:54pm

Must watch this....7 countries in 5 years



miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 30, 2011 - 5:56am

Neither the Wars Nor the Leaders Were Great

March 29 • Ralph Raico

From the 18th century to our own time, the liberal tradition has stood firmly against war, based both on principle and on the reality of how and why wars begin, and also the wicked damage they do to society. The excuses for wars mask the underlying reason for them.




The king of Prussia, Frederick II ("the Great"), confessed that he had seized the province of Silesia from the Empress Maria Theresa in 1740 because, as a newcomer to the throne, he had to make a name for himself. This initiated a war with Austria that developed into a worldwide war (in North America, the French and Indian War), and went on to 1763. Of course, many tens of thousands died in that series of wars.

Frederick's admission is probably unique in the annals of leaders of states. In general, rulers have been much more circumspect about revealing the true reasons for their wars, as well as the methods by which they conduct them. Pretexts and evasions have proliferated. In today's democratic societies, these are endorsed - often invented - by compliant professors and other intellectuals.

For generations, the unmasking of such excuses for war and war making has been the essence of historical revisionism, or simply revisionism. Revisionism and classical liberalism, today called libertarianism, have always been closely linked.

 

for the rest see link above....




R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 15, 2011 - 7:51pm

 nuggler wrote:
Dunno, man. I had such a day at work I feel like whipping someone's ass right now. Anyone's ass. 



R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 15, 2011 - 4:56pm

Survey Says: War Is the Irrational Choice
How many lives would you be willing to sacrifice to remove a murderous dictator like Saddam Hussein? Most of the models that researchers use to study conflicts like the Iraq war assume that civilians and leaders make a rational calculation: If the total cost of the war is less than the cost of the alternatives, they will support war. But according to a new study, those models are wrong. Surveys of people in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and other violent situations suggest that participants consistently ignored quantifiable costs and benefits, relying instead on "sacred values." The finding could lead to better predictions of when conflicts will escalate to violence.

Models of rational behavior predict many of society's patterns, such as the prevalence of tax evasion and union strikes. But seemingly irrational behaviors like war—in which the measurable costs often far outweigh the measurable benefits—have stumped researchers going back to Charles Darwin. The prospect of crippling economic burdens and huge numbers of deaths doesn't necessarily sway people from their positions on whether going to war is the right or wrong choice. One possible explanation is that people are not weighing the pros and cons at all, but rather using a moral logic of "sacred values"—convictions that trump all other considerations—that cannot be quantified.

To try to capture people in the act of making such decisions, psychologist Jeremy Ginges of the New School for Social Research in New York City and anthropologist Scott Atran of École Normale Superieure in Paris challenged people around the world with a series of difficult questions. (...)


nuggler

nuggler Avatar

Location: RU Sirius ?
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 18, 2010 - 8:45am


"Hedges delivered a rousing speech about the nature of hope (in contrast to what certain campaign slogans might have suggested in recent years), pointing out that 'hope has a cost, hope is not comfortable,' before joining other supporters of Veterans for Peace who chained themselves to the White House fence."


‘Hope Is Action’: Hedges and Ellsberg Arrested at White House Protest

http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/hope_is_action_hedges_ellsberg_arrested_at_white_house_protest_20101217/

Posted on Dec 17, 2010

On Thursday, author, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and Truthdig columnist Chris Hedges and Pentagon Papers whistle-blower Daniel Ellsberg were among the 131 anti-war activists arrested during a nonviolent demonstration outside the White House to protest against the war in Afghanistan as well as America’s ongoing conflicts in Iraq and Pakistan.

Hedges delivered a rousing speech about the nature of hope (in contrast to what certain campaign slogans might have suggested in recent years), pointing out that “hope has a cost, hope is not comfortable,” before joining other supporters of Veterans for Peace who chained themselves to the White House fence. When asked why he chose that course of action, Hedges replied, “Because it’s all we have left at this point. ... The normal mechanisms by which democratic participation are rendered possible in this country have been closed shut, and if we don’t do this, we die. This is what’s left of hope in this country.”

Ellsberg said he was drawn to the demonstration in part because veterans were leading the action. “I know that people here understand this war is as hopeless and wrong as the war we participated in in Vietnam, and it is not going to end by a presidential initiative,” he said. “It’ll only be because the American public has awakened to their responsibilities and to the realities of this war.” The “big lie” that the American government is telling its people now, Ellsberg believes, “is that these wars are protecting us at home.”  —KA



miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 18, 2010 - 7:41am

Passing the Bloodstained Buck
Posted on Dec 17, 2010

The mercenary firm formerly known as Blackwater has argued in court that the company's private contractors who killed 17 Iraqis in Baghdad in 2007 should not be held accountable. Why? It's Washington's fault, they claim, as Blackwater fighters were acting as employees of the U.S. government at the time. -JCL

Al-Jazeera English:

The security company formerly known as Blackwater has told a US federal judge that the US government, and not the company itself, should be held accountable for a 2007 shooting by its contractors that killed 17 Iraqis in Nisour Square in Baghdad.

Lawyers for the company, now known as Xe Services, argued in court on Thursday that Blackwater contractors were essentially acting as employees of the US government because they were providing security to State Department personnel.

The North Carolina-based company and several of its contractors are seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit that was filed on behalf of three people killed in the shooting: Ali Kinani, Abrahem Abed Al Mafraje and Mahde Sahab Naser Shamake. The lawsuit accuses the parties of wrongful death and negligence, and seeks punitive damages.

.


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 26, 27, 28  Next