[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - the_jake - Dec 3, 2023 - 1:03pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Dec 3, 2023 - 12:51pm
 
Think About It - miamizsun - Dec 3, 2023 - 12:49pm
 
Israel - R_P - Dec 3, 2023 - 12:40pm
 
Museum of Iconic Album Covers - rgio - Dec 3, 2023 - 12:08pm
 
Wordle - daily game - JrzyTmata - Dec 3, 2023 - 12:00pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Dec 3, 2023 - 11:50am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Dec 3, 2023 - 11:19am
 
What Puts You In the Christmas Mood? - thisbody - Dec 3, 2023 - 10:58am
 
Best guitarists - oldviolin - Dec 3, 2023 - 10:48am
 
December 2023 Photo Theme - Reflection - Alchemist - Dec 3, 2023 - 10:37am
 
If not RP, what are you listening to right now? - westslope - Dec 3, 2023 - 10:19am
 
NYTimes Connections - islander - Dec 3, 2023 - 10:01am
 
As California Goes, So Goes The Rest Of The Country - islander - Dec 3, 2023 - 9:59am
 
Things You Thought Today - oldviolin - Dec 3, 2023 - 9:37am
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - GeneP59 - Dec 3, 2023 - 9:11am
 
The World IS Hunted - Steely_D - Dec 2, 2023 - 11:20pm
 
Photos you haven't taken of yourself - KurtfromLaQuinta - Dec 2, 2023 - 9:11pm
 
November 2023 Photo Theme - Perspective - MrDill - Dec 2, 2023 - 10:11am
 
2024 Elections! - Red_Dragon - Dec 2, 2023 - 9:16am
 
Musky Mythology - Red_Dragon - Dec 2, 2023 - 9:11am
 
Update playlist please - hansotten - Dec 2, 2023 - 2:55am
 
What the hell OV? - Manbird - Dec 1, 2023 - 11:10pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Dec 1, 2023 - 7:42pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - black321 - Dec 1, 2023 - 2:58pm
 
Fear of Flying - Beaker - Dec 1, 2023 - 1:53pm
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - Dec 1, 2023 - 9:35am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - GeneP59 - Dec 1, 2023 - 8:43am
 
The Obituary Page - DaveInSaoMiguel - Dec 1, 2023 - 8:34am
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - thisbody - Dec 1, 2023 - 8:13am
 
songs that ROCK! - thisbody - Dec 1, 2023 - 6:53am
 
Live Music - thisbody - Dec 1, 2023 - 6:04am
 
Buddy's Haven - miamizsun - Dec 1, 2023 - 4:47am
 
Other Medical Stuff - kurtster - Dec 1, 2023 - 3:04am
 
OUR CATS!! - Red_Dragon - Nov 30, 2023 - 6:11pm
 
RightWingNutZ - kcar - Nov 30, 2023 - 4:50pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Nov 30, 2023 - 4:44pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - DrLex - Nov 30, 2023 - 2:00pm
 
JFK Assassination - kurtster - Nov 30, 2023 - 12:46pm
 
Pogues! - ScottFromWyoming - Nov 30, 2023 - 11:45am
 
FLAC stream crashes Sonos - fbloemhof - Nov 30, 2023 - 10:32am
 
Download Manager IPhone problems - RPnate1 - Nov 29, 2023 - 11:31am
 
RP On Windows Media Player? - William - Nov 29, 2023 - 10:00am
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - lily34 - Nov 29, 2023 - 8:44am
 
Animal Resistance - lily34 - Nov 28, 2023 - 9:59am
 
Trump - kcar - Nov 28, 2023 - 9:09am
 
The Dragons' Roost - GeneP59 - Nov 28, 2023 - 8:59am
 
Economix - black321 - Nov 28, 2023 - 7:38am
 
NY Times Spelling Bee - lily34 - Nov 28, 2023 - 6:48am
 
New mix, what would you like to see ? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 28, 2023 - 6:27am
 
Tech - what makes RP sound so good? - William - Nov 27, 2023 - 5:37pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Nov 27, 2023 - 1:32pm
 
New Music - oldviolin - Nov 27, 2023 - 11:52am
 
Questions. - miamizsun - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:37am
 
♥ ♥ ♥ Vote For Pie ♥ ♥ ♥ - miamizsun - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:36am
 
iPad wake screen - michaelmuller - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:11am
 
the Todd Rundgren topic - Coaxial - Nov 27, 2023 - 9:36am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Nov 27, 2023 - 7:46am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Nov 26, 2023 - 8:25pm
 
Happy Thanksgiving! - Bill_J - Nov 26, 2023 - 5:58pm
 
Audio Problems - uaerez - Nov 26, 2023 - 12:30pm
 
Shameless Band Promotion - West Coast Division - sunybuny - Nov 26, 2023 - 11:56am
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Nov 26, 2023 - 10:45am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Nov 26, 2023 - 9:54am
 
AI Bill - timothy_john - Nov 26, 2023 - 3:52am
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 25, 2023 - 8:07pm
 
Discussion Thread for the Meetup Meetup Topic - Red_Dragon - Nov 25, 2023 - 2:02pm
 
Europe - thisbody - Nov 25, 2023 - 1:08pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Nov 25, 2023 - 12:00pm
 
Germany - thisbody - Nov 24, 2023 - 12:29pm
 
Ukraine - Steely_D - Nov 23, 2023 - 1:20pm
 
Artificial Intelligence - thisbody - Nov 23, 2023 - 9:28am
 
It's the economy stupid. - thisbody - Nov 23, 2023 - 9:17am
 
Tech & Science - thisbody - Nov 23, 2023 - 9:08am
 
Arlo Guthrie's Alice's Restaurant Massacree - islander - Nov 23, 2023 - 7:51am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » It's the economy stupid. Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Post to this Topic
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2016 - 10:39pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
 haresfur wrote:
I'll try again.

You are saying it is bad in that it there is a net loss of wealth making mankind worse off. I'm saying that they not only did it for publicity (something that can be purchased that usually is believed to lead to profit) but that they got their target market to pay for it out of the market-people's entertainment budget. So you are basically arguing that the choice people made freely is bad for mankind. Sounds like Libertarianism to me.

Libertarianism consists of not stopping them. Not interested in stopping them.

My point was purely economic; people spending absurd amounts of money to fund a basketball stadium and bribe a team to stay in town are also net destroyers of wealth, and also seen as economy-boosting measures. GDP measures only money changing hands, ignoring what that money actually bought.

And I don't even regard entertainment (which consumes resources, land, and labor but produces nothing tangible) as bad. Art is inspiration—a meta-good, an essential part of civilization. Just don't equate it (directly) with economic progress.

 
I guess I can think of worse things. The hole is a waste but what if, instead of buying hole-digging time, people bought Monster gold-plated speaker wire for their stereo? And threw out their old wire? The wire (either wire) might only ever carry Air Supply and Paul Harvey reruns. 
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2016 - 10:26pm

 haresfur wrote:
I'll try again.

You are saying it is bad in that it there is a net loss of wealth making mankind worse off. I'm saying that they not only did it for publicity (something that can be purchased that usually is believed to lead to profit) but that they got their target market to pay for it out of the market-people's entertainment budget. So you are basically arguing that the choice people made freely is bad for mankind. Sounds like Libertarianism to me.

Libertarianism consists of not stopping them. Not interested in stopping them.

My point was purely economic; people spending absurd amounts of money to fund a basketball stadium and bribe a team to stay in town are also net destroyers of wealth, and also seen as economy-boosting measures. GDP measures only money changing hands, ignoring what that money actually bought.

And I don't even regard entertainment (which consumes resources, land, and labor but produces nothing tangible) as bad. Art is inspiration—a meta-good, an essential part of civilization. Just don't equate it (directly) with economic progress.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2016 - 9:14pm

 haresfur wrote:

I'll try again.

You are saying it is bad in that it there is a net loss of wealth making mankind worse off. I'm saying that they not only did it for publicity (something that can be purchased that usually is believed to lead to profit) but that they got their target market to pay for it out of the market-people's entertainment budget. So you are basically arguing that the choice people made freely is bad for mankind. Sounds like Libertarianism to me.

 
Ouch ...  
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2016 - 7:33pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
 haresfur wrote:
I don't see it as any less productive than most entertainment industries. NBA doesn't exactly build wealth in the way you are saying. It is marketing where you get your market to to pay for it rather than forking out the money yourself. Even that isn't new - look at the T-shirt industry.

I agree that it is a waste, much like the NBA.

I'll try this one more time.

The point isn't that the event itself is good or bad. The point is that it resulted in a net loss of wealth, but the metric most commonly used to measure the economy says it grew the economy. Mankind is worse off, but the numbers look great.

This stunt is basically a Keynesian stimulus without the pretense of actually accomplishing anything, something Keynes wrote favorably about.

 
I'll try again.

You are saying it is bad in that it there is a net loss of wealth making mankind worse off. I'm saying that they not only did it for publicity (something that can be purchased that usually is believed to lead to profit) but that they got their target market to pay for it out of the market-people's entertainment budget. So you are basically arguing that the choice people made freely is bad for mankind. Sounds like Libertarianism to me.
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2016 - 6:11pm

 haresfur wrote:
I don't see it as any less productive than most entertainment industries. NBA doesn't exactly build wealth in the way you are saying. It is marketing where you get your market to to pay for it rather than forking out the money yourself. Even that isn't new - look at the T-shirt industry.

I agree that it is a waste, much like the NBA.

I'll try this one more time.

The point isn't that the event itself is good or bad. The point is that it resulted in a net loss of wealth, but the metric most commonly used to measure the economy says it grew the economy. Mankind is worse off, but the numbers look great.

This stunt is basically a Keynesian stimulus without the pretense of actually accomplishing anything, something Keynes wrote favorably about.
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2016 - 4:08pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
The company that makes Cards Against Humanity solicited donations to dig a giant hole.

No reason, just dig a hole. Just to dig a hole. An utterly pointless gesture.

They raised $100,573 and dug.

I'm posting this here just to point out the absurdity of some economic orthodoxy. This exercise increased GDP because money changed hands, but resulted in a net destruction of wealth. Diesel fuel was burned, earthmovers inched closer to their ends of life, people spent hours of their lives that fed, housed, healed, and improved the lives of no one. In the end the land in which the hole was dug has—by any measure—declined in value. The earth as a whole is worse off. But John Maynard Keynes calls it a win.

I'm sure somebody will step up to declare this a net positive because the guys who drove the earthmovers got paid, the refinery workers got paid, the people who make earthmover parts will eventually get paid a bit earlier than otherwise. Money moved! Hooray!

But wealth—the sum total of resources, land, and man-hours available to useful things—declined. Mankind is worse off. The money that changed hands didn't increase, it just changed hands. Whatever productive use it would have had at the hands of its original owners will not happen. This happened instead.

This is your economy on Keynes. Any questions?

 
I don't see it as any less productive than most entertainment industries. NBA doesn't exactly build wealth in the way you are saying. It is marketing where you get your market to to pay for it rather than forking out the money yourself. Even that isn't new - look at the T-shirt industry.

I agree that it is a waste, much like the NBA.
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2016 - 1:52pm

The company that makes Cards Against Humanity solicited donations to dig a giant hole.

No reason, just dig a hole. Just to dig a hole. An utterly pointless gesture.

They raised $100,573 and dug.

I'm posting this here just to point out the absurdity of some economic orthodoxy. This exercise increased GDP because money changed hands, but resulted in a net destruction of wealth. Diesel fuel was burned, earthmovers inched closer to their ends of life, people spent hours of their lives that fed, housed, healed, and improved the lives of no one. In the end the land in which the hole was dug has—by any measure—declined in value. The earth as a whole is worse off. But John Maynard Keynes calls it a win.

I'm sure somebody will step up to declare this a net positive because the guys who drove the earthmovers got paid, the refinery workers got paid, the people who make earthmover parts will eventually get paid a bit earlier than otherwise. Money moved! Hooray!

But wealth—the sum total of resources, land, and man-hours available to useful things—declined. Mankind is worse off. The money that changed hands didn't increase, it just changed hands. Whatever productive use it would have had at the hands of its original owners will not happen. This happened instead.

This is your economy on Keynes. Any questions?
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2016 - 7:54am

OPEC reaches deal to cut production (oil prices rising), Trump wants to ramp up spending, while cutting taxes, bond yields jumping in the last month...say hello again to our little old friend inflation. 


Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Nov 29, 2016 - 10:05am

Unemployment in America, Mapped Over Time
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Aug 21, 2016 - 11:23am


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 1, 2015 - 11:11pm

 kurtster wrote:
Real capitalism...
 
Much like real Christians and real Scotsmen there is no such thing...

I suspect you mean economic liberalism or Laissez-faire.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 1, 2015 - 10:06pm

Read past the part of gold and it may mean something greater ...

The Phantom Of Interest-Rate Ideology Challenges Gold


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 27, 2015 - 3:42am

 aflanigan wrote:

Good point. Credentialism has been with us since the days of the guilds, right?

Letting go of old patterns and habits can definitely be difficult. There are various people sounding the alarm regarding credential inflation and pointing out that four year degrees/ advanced degrees aren't the bargain they used to be.  So far I don't think middle class parents are convinced.

Maybe we need to convince people that we've reached a sort of singularity/tipping point with respect to our current version of capitalism. If trying all the old tricks that worked in the past fail to yield results now, if the middle class continues to shrink and wealth/wage gaps of various kinds continue to grow, maybe we can accept that some fundamental changes beyond the usual approach are in order.

 
Ah yes, capitalism.  Real capitalism quit existing when the term too big to fail was introduced.  Too big to fail is the antithesis of capitalism.  In straight forward capitalism, nothing is too big to fail.  

Its a brave new / old world.  Earlier, I mentioned the unemployment rate for 4 year grads and yes you were correct as a lot of that had to do with the selection of majors.  In today's employment climate, it is unreasonable to expect full gainful employment with a degree in philosophy or art for example.  Yet there are many going into these areas.  Why ?  Is it poor counseling or wishful thinking on the part of the student ?

Someone needs to properly counsel on what majors will end up with good employment outcomes.  These are not the times where the pursuit of personal indulgence ends up with gainful employment.

An old factoid ... Back in the 70's I once heard that over half of over the road truck drivers had majored in psychology. 
aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 20, 2015 - 2:25pm

I alluded to the shrinkage of the middle class previously below. Another aspect of this issue is that, however we define middle class these days, regardless of their numbers, they are not doing so hot financially.

This was posted on Huffpo today presumably in anticipation of the SOTU speech tonight:

The Sad State of America's Middle Class, in 6 Charts 


aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 16, 2015 - 9:46am

 miamizsun wrote:
it looks like i've started my first meme

who knew?

 
Should we rename the topic COASTAL PUNS?
MrsHobieJoe

MrsHobieJoe Avatar

Location: somewhere in Europe
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 15, 2015 - 4:25pm

I thought the thread might be referring to exchange rate turmoil in Europe, but no!


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 15, 2015 - 3:10pm

it looks like i've started my first meme

who knew?


cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 15, 2015 - 7:38am

 aflanigan wrote:

I suspect pier instruction only works for stevedores.

 
I'm gonna dock you ten points for that.
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 15, 2015 - 7:35am

 aflanigan wrote:

I suspect pier instruction only works for stevedores.

 

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 15, 2015 - 7:15am

 aflanigan wrote:

I suspect pier instruction only works for stevedores.

 
good catch

yeah them too
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next