[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

How's the weather? - oldviolin - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:57am
 
Beyond mix - gregkurtz1 - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:52am
 
July 2025 Photo Theme - Stone - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:17am
 
Spambags on RP - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:02am
 
Wordle - daily game - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 10, 2025 - 8:54am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - Proclivities - Jul 10, 2025 - 8:53am
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Jul 10, 2025 - 8:42am
 
NYTimes Connections - geoff_morphini - Jul 10, 2025 - 7:47am
 
NY Times Strands - Proclivities - Jul 10, 2025 - 7:02am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 6:32am
 
misheard lyrics - GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 6:30am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jul 10, 2025 - 6:17am
 
Democratic Party - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 10, 2025 - 12:13am
 
Baseball, anyone? - geoff_morphini - Jul 9, 2025 - 7:23pm
 
TEXAS - Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2025 - 5:57pm
 
Live Music - R_P - Jul 9, 2025 - 1:52pm
 
Name My Band - GeneP59 - Jul 9, 2025 - 1:16pm
 
Israel - R_P - Jul 9, 2025 - 1:04pm
 
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote') - black321 - Jul 9, 2025 - 11:33am
 
Fascism In America - ColdMiser - Jul 9, 2025 - 10:23am
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jul 9, 2025 - 8:06am
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2025 - 7:50am
 
Economix - oldviolin - Jul 9, 2025 - 7:45am
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Jul 9, 2025 - 7:26am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 9, 2025 - 7:21am
 
Outstanding Covers - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2025 - 9:29pm
 
Trump Lies™ - R_P - Jul 8, 2025 - 7:14pm
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Jul 8, 2025 - 5:43pm
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 8, 2025 - 4:57pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Jul 8, 2025 - 2:40pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Alchemist - Jul 8, 2025 - 11:45am
 
What is the meaning of this? - islander - Jul 8, 2025 - 10:11am
 
Love & Hate - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2025 - 8:15am
 
Artificial Intelligence - Red_Dragon - Jul 8, 2025 - 6:45am
 
Anti-War - R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 6:45pm
 
Environment - R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 5:38pm
 
(Big) Media Watch - R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 12:04pm
 
The Grateful Dead - black321 - Jul 7, 2025 - 11:17am
 
M.A.G.A. - Red_Dragon - Jul 7, 2025 - 9:26am
 
Music Videos - black321 - Jul 7, 2025 - 9:00am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 7, 2025 - 8:59am
 
Immigration - black321 - Jul 7, 2025 - 8:02am
 
Russia - Red_Dragon - Jul 7, 2025 - 7:39am
 
Triskele and The Grateful Dead - geoff_morphini - Jul 6, 2025 - 10:33pm
 
Hey Baby, It's The 4th O' July - GeneP59 - Jul 6, 2025 - 9:42pm
 
Customize a shirt with my favorite album - 2644364236 - Jul 6, 2025 - 7:20pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - R_P - Jul 6, 2025 - 10:56am
 
Beer - SeriousLee - Jul 6, 2025 - 6:54am
 
Iran - R_P - Jul 5, 2025 - 9:01pm
 
What are you doing RIGHT NOW? - Coaxial - Jul 5, 2025 - 6:48pm
 
New vs Old RP App (Android) - mhamann123 - Jul 5, 2025 - 5:41am
 
Britain - R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 1:41pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 11:10am
 
Best Song Comments. - 2644364236 - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:32pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 3, 2025 - 3:49pm
 
The Obituary Page - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:27am
 
Documentaries - Proclivities - Jul 3, 2025 - 9:31am
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - Steely_D - Jul 3, 2025 - 8:36am
 
Copyright and theft - black321 - Jul 3, 2025 - 6:48am
 
Protest Songs - R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:20pm
 
Fox Spews - islander - Jul 2, 2025 - 10:39am
 
New Music - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:30am
 
Carmen to Stones - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 1, 2025 - 7:44pm
 
President(s) Musk/Trump - VV - Jul 1, 2025 - 8:10am
 
June 2025 Photo Theme - Arches - Alchemist - Jun 30, 2025 - 9:10pm
 
Please help me find this song - LazyEmergency - Jun 30, 2025 - 8:42pm
 
Forum Posting Guidelines - rickylee123 - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:17pm
 
Thanks William! - buddy - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:49pm
 
Living in America - R_P - Jun 30, 2025 - 3:15pm
 
Gardeners Corner - marko86 - Jun 30, 2025 - 10:39am
 
Comics! - Red_Dragon - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:59am
 
Birthday wishes - Coaxial - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:36am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:39am
 
Global Mix renaming - frazettaart - Jun 29, 2025 - 9:23am
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 28, 2025 - 10:17am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Ask an Atheist Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 58, 59, 60  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 12:28pm

 Steely_D wrote:
Taken alone, yes. “It’s so complex it must’ve been created.”
That runs up against the other part: that people who really know the universe (better all the time) know its vastness - and emptiness (so far). Matter/Energy, Dark Matter (there is 5x more of that than there is “regular” matter) and the biggest portion: Dark Energy. Is there a Watchmaker responsible for that, too? So the mere existence of us suggests a creator - but the lack of existence of something else Out There - back towards the beginning of time - suggests the opposite.

A bit more about black holes and all that stuff. Fascinating - and frightening in a way.

You'll end up with arguments about "fine-tuning" and the anthropic principle.

It mostly suggests our limitations of observation and knowledge.

I think it was DeGrasse Tyson who mused that the universe's purpose seems to be the creation of black holes.
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 12:12pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

I think it helps to make a distinction here. 
Invoking religion/faith/belief in a higher obtuse power to explain things we don't understand ultimately runs the risk of being pure tautology;

why did this or that happen?
Well, God. 
why didn't this or that happen?
Well, God.

Ultimately, this doesn't help much if you are trying to work out why things happen. Here science really did suddenly shed light on the Dark Ages and in terms of the explanatory power (of chains of causation) it easily trumps religion.

However, if you merely invoke a faith/belief in God as an act of humility, as an acknowledgement of pure wonder at being alive and that not only do we exist, but are aware of the fact and surrounded by a vast universe of being, almost all of which appears to be insentient, then it has a different role and that is something I can acknowledge as valid, for it is an emotional response - a response to the awesomeness of things. Kind of like singing as the sun rises, or Gregorian chants in a monastery. There is something undeniably "ecstatic" about this.. ex-stasis— in the sense of standing outside your customary point of view and sensing the universal flow through you.  

I guess this is the spiritual aspect of religion. But IMO this is completely unrelated to the causative aspect that many religions claim to have a monopoly over, which by nature are exclusive and the absolute opposite of universal ex-stasis. Note also, the spiritual state of being is passive/receptive. You let it happen. It is not programmatic/dogmatic (make it happen).

To go a step further, an emotional/spiritual response to being does not necessarily mean we have to postulate the existence of a God as a causative, explanatory factor. Most birds I know appear to get along quite well without being aware of "God" and still sing gloriously at sunrise. But if someone finds the concept of God as a neat encapsulation as the source of all wonder, I can live with that. Maybe that is where birds are at. This would at least explain all that singing.
 
What I can't live so well with is when some people seem to think their religion gives them some kind of prior knowledge or right to tell others what to do. That is a fatal flaw of many religions and seems rooted in my view in basic tribal instinct than anything remotely spiritual.
Likewise, I also can't live with people who use scientific causative arguments to belittle people whose religious basis is purely spiritual. 

That seems to be what religion should be teaching us...or the purpose of prayer.
To get out of the way and let God, the energy of the universe...whatever you want to call it...flow through you. 
Maybe not so different as to how artists explain their works?
Slay the ego dragon.
If you want to experience, regardless of one's faith, 
sit in a quiet room and ask, what is it that is keeping me from my true self? 
If you are still enough, the answer will come...but i can only from my own experience.

As for those use their religion as some sort of "monopoly"...I probably have less time for these folks than an atheist

Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: The foot of Mount Belzoni
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 12:07pm

 kurtster wrote:
Things that do manifest themselves without any known physical explanations. 


Whupping out my Occam’s Razor I always believe that stuff like that is a problem with data gathering (e.g., we can’t see magnetism so why does that metal move?) or with our logistics (well, we know that the sun revolves around the earth but measuring how Mars moves across the sky with that weird pathway just defies explanation).


Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: The foot of Mount Belzoni
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 11:53am

 R_P wrote:

Usually an argument for Deism, i.e. the watchmaker analogy.



Taken alone, yes. “It’s so complex it must’ve been created.”
That runs up against the other part: that people who really know the universe (better all the time) know its vastness - and emptiness (so far). Matter/Energy, Dark Matter (there is 5x more of that than there is “regular” matter) and the biggest portion: Dark Energy. Is there a Watchmaker responsible for that, too? So the mere existence of us suggests a creator - but the lack of existence of something else Out There - back towards the beginning of time - suggests the opposite.

A bit more about black holes and all that stuff. Fascinating - and frightening in a way.

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 11:28am

 Steely_D wrote:
I can’t believe in an anthropomorphic god; that makes no sense. But is all of this vastness and complexity really random?

Usually an argument for Deism, i.e. the watchmaker analogy.

oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 11:20am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

I think it helps to make a distinction here. 
Invoking religion/faith/belief in a higher obtuse power to explain things we don't understand ultimately runs the risk of being pure tautology;

why did this or that happen?
Well, God. 
why didn't this or that happen?
Well, God.


Ultimately, this doesn't help much if you are trying to work out why things happen. Here science really did suddenly shed light on the Dark Ages and in terms of the explanatory power (of chains of causation) it easily trumps religion.

However, if you merely invoke a faith/belief in God as an act of humility, as an acknowledgement of pure wonder at being alive and that not only do we exist, but are aware of the fact and surrounded by a vast universe of being, almost all of which appears to be insentient, then it has a different role and that is something I can acknowledge as valid, for it is an emotional response - a response to the awesomeness of things. Kind of like singing as the sun rises, or Gregorian chants in a monastery. There is something undeniably "ecstatic" about this.. ex-stasis— in the sense of standing outside your customary point of view and sensing the universal flow through you.  

I guess this is the spiritual aspect of religion. But IMO this is completely unrelated to the causative aspect that many religions claim to have a monopoly over, which by nature are exclusive and the absolute opposite of universal ex-stasis. Note also, the spiritual state of being is passive/receptive. You let it happen. It is not programmatic/dogmatic (make it happen).

To go a step further, an emotional/spiritual response to being does not necessarily mean we have to postulate the existence of a God as a causative, explanatory factor. Most birds I know appear to get along quite well without being aware of "God" and still sing gloriously at sunrise. But if someone finds the concept of God as a neat encapsulation as the source of all wonder, I can live with that. Maybe that is where birds are at. This would at least explain all that singing.
 
What I can't live so well with is when some people seem to think their religion gives them some kind of prior knowledge or right to tell others what to do. That is a fatal flaw of many religions and seems rooted in my view in basic tribal instinct than anything remotely spiritual.
Likewise, I also can't live with people who use scientific causative arguments to belittle people whose religious basis is purely spiritual. 

I believe that in most cases man is likely to be a factor.
Yes. Knowledge evolves understanding. Additionally, refines curiosity.


Beautifully stated. 

Just because we might not believe in "God" doesn't necessarily mean that "God" doesn't believe in us.



NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 11:09am

 oldviolin wrote:

If a faithful person claims that the evidence is positively everything and everywhere, what would an undecided or negatively inclined person as to faith accept as evidence? Not being tricky. Literally is there a marker or condition?


I think it helps to make a distinction here. 
Invoking religion/faith/belief in a higher obtuse power to explain things we don't understand ultimately runs the risk of being pure tautology;

why did this or that happen?
Well, God. 
why didn't this or that happen?
Well, God.

Ultimately, this doesn't help much if you are trying to work out why things happen. Here science really did suddenly shed light on the Dark Ages and in terms of the explanatory power (of chains of causation) it easily trumps religion.

However, if you merely invoke a faith/belief in God as an act of humility, as an acknowledgement of pure wonder at being alive and that not only do we exist, but are aware of the fact and surrounded by a vast universe of being, almost all of which appears to be insentient, then it has a different role and that is something I can acknowledge as valid, for it is an emotional response - a response to the awesomeness of things. Kind of like singing as the sun rises, or Gregorian chants in a monastery. There is something undeniably "ecstatic" about this.. ex-stasis— in the sense of standing outside your customary point of view and sensing the universal flow through you.  

I guess this is the spiritual aspect of religion. But IMO this is completely unrelated to the causative aspect that many religions claim to have a monopoly over, which by nature are exclusive and the absolute opposite of universal ex-stasis. Note also, the spiritual state of being is passive/receptive. You let it happen. It is not programmatic/dogmatic (make it happen).

To go a step further, an emotional/spiritual response to being does not necessarily mean we have to postulate the existence of a God as a causative, explanatory factor. Most birds I know appear to get along quite well without being aware of "God" and still sing gloriously at sunrise. But if someone finds the concept of God as a neat encapsulation as the source of all wonder, I can live with that. Maybe that is where birds are at. This would at least explain all that singing.
 
What I can't live so well with is when some people seem to think their religion gives them some kind of prior knowledge or right to tell others what to do. That is a fatal flaw of many religions and seems rooted in my view in basic tribal instinct than anything remotely spiritual.
Likewise, I also can't live with people who use scientific causative arguments to belittle people whose religious basis is purely spiritual. 
Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: The foot of Mount Belzoni
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 10:13am

 Lazy8 wrote:

"I can't explain it" encompasses vast amount of daily life. None of that implies any particular actor or cause being at play.

If you assign some cause (outside of the influence of the physical) to anything you can't explain you have entered the realm of religious belief.



Well, when you believe in things that you don’t understand, and you suffer…
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 8:57am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Who's this "we"?

Faith is belief without evidence.


Belief is holding something as a truth
Faith is hoping something is truth...so there should be a nice heaping of doubt in faith.

...and if you hold something of faith (and there are universal things of faith) as a belief, 
then we haven't slayed the dragon of ego...
oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 8:53am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Who's this "we"?

Faith is belief without evidence.

If a faithful person claims that the evidence is positively everything and everywhere, what would an undecided or negatively inclined person as to faith accept as evidence? Not being tricky. Literally is there a marker or condition?

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 8:43am

 black321 wrote:
Do we understand the difference between "belief" and "faith"?

Who's this "we"?

Faith is belief without evidence.
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 8:41am

 Lazy8 wrote:

"I can't explain it" encompasses vast amount of daily life. None of that implies any particular actor or cause being at play.

If you assign some cause (outside of the influence of the physical) to anything you can't explain you have entered the realm of religious belief.



Do we understand the difference between "belief" and "faith"?
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 8:28am

 kurtster wrote:
I consider that part of the material world.

I was thinking more in terms of the paranormal.  Things that do manifest themselves without any known physical explanations.  And outside of religious acceptance and explanations as well.

Or in other words, is the paranormal (and perhaps reincarnation) considered not real and therefore self delusional ?
Or never mind.  Maybe next year.

"I can't explain it" encompasses vast amount of daily life. None of that implies any particular actor or cause being at play.

If you assign some cause (outside of the influence of the physical) to anything you can't explain you have entered the realm of religious belief.

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 7:24am

 kurtster wrote:
I consider that part of the material world.

I was thinking more in terms of the paranormal.  Things that do manifest themselves without any known physical explanations.  And outside of religious acceptance and explanations as well.

Or in other words, is the paranormal (and perhaps reincarnation) considered not real and therefore self delusional ?
Or never mind.  Maybe next year.

One size doesn't fit all. Some atheists might believe in spirits/ghosts/whatever, while not believing in deities of any kind.

Others might not.


black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 7:06am

Does the quality of audio cable matter?
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 5:47am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:



  great shades of Douglas Adams in there. 


xAI/Grok

is aiming to be the thgttg of machine intelligence
should be fun
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 3:01am

 Steely_D wrote:

One of my oldest friends, a college buddy/roomie is a planetary scientist. He discovered the furthest known contacted object in our solar system, untouched by thermal influence since the beginning, and therefore a treasure trove of information as to what happened at the beginning of the system. He predicted its shape using occultation, and has an understanding of space that boggles the mind. He was friends with Sagan.

Once, sitting with him and another (very religious) friend, I tried to ask him what his (limited human) understanding of the universe meant to him in terms of god or whatever. He’s a quiet, thoughtful guy, and - in the milliseconds he paused - my religious friend jumped in and hijacked the convo. I’ll try again on another day, but I kinda think it was a moment that’s passed.

Does the vastness of the universe say something about the non existence of a god? Or is it that we just are unable to comprehend something that would be that big compared to us?

Similarly, when you study biological functions, does the complexity of things like kidney function with its semipermeable membranes here but not there as urine gets made say something about a divine intervention that allowed something so microscopically detailed to exist, and therefore for us to exist?

I can’t believe in an anthropomorphic god; that makes no sense. But is all of this vastness and complexity really random?







  great shades of Douglas Adams in there. 
Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: The foot of Mount Belzoni
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 1:55am

One of my oldest friends, a college buddy/roomie is a planetary scientist. He discovered the furthest known contacted object in our solar system, untouched by thermal influence since the beginning, and therefore a treasure trove of information as to what happened at the beginning of the system. He predicted its shape using occultation, and has an understanding of space that boggles the mind. He was friends with Sagan.

Once, sitting with him and another (very religious) friend, I tried to ask him what his (limited human) understanding of the universe meant to him in terms of god or whatever. He’s a quiet, thoughtful guy, and - in the milliseconds he paused - my religious friend jumped in and hijacked the convo. I’ll try again on another day, but I kinda think it was a moment that’s passed.

Does the vastness of the universe say something about the non existence of a god? Or is it that we just are unable to comprehend something that would be that big compared to us?

Similarly, when you study biological functions, does the complexity of things like kidney function with its semipermeable membranes here but not there as urine gets made say something about a divine intervention that allowed something so microscopically detailed to exist, and therefore for us to exist?

I can’t believe in an anthropomorphic god; that makes no sense. But is all of this vastness and complexity really random?




NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 19, 2024 - 12:07am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Like arguing on the internet?




kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 18, 2024 - 11:34pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
 kurtster wrote:
Do atheists have any interests beyond the material world ?

Like arguing on the internet?
 
I consider that part of the material world.

I was thinking more in terms of the paranormal.  Things that do manifest themselves without any known physical explanations.  And outside of religious acceptance and explanations as well.

Or in other words, is the paranormal (and perhaps reincarnation) considered not real and therefore self delusional ?
Or never mind.  Maybe next year.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 58, 59, 60  Next