July 2025 Photo Theme - Stone
- fractalv - Jul 16, 2025 - 8:45pm
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - Jul 16, 2025 - 8:41pm
Movies to avoid?
- Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2025 - 7:24pm
Baseball, anyone?
- kurtster - Jul 16, 2025 - 5:47pm
Name My Band
- oldviolin - Jul 16, 2025 - 3:30pm
Russia
- R_P - Jul 16, 2025 - 3:15pm
Trump
- R_P - Jul 16, 2025 - 2:55pm
Things You Thought Today
- black321 - Jul 16, 2025 - 1:53pm
Israel
- R_P - Jul 16, 2025 - 1:48pm
The Marie Antoinette Moment...
- oldviolin - Jul 16, 2025 - 1:36pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- oldviolin - Jul 16, 2025 - 1:31pm
New Music
- R_P - Jul 16, 2025 - 1:05pm
Trump Lies™
- Proclivities - Jul 16, 2025 - 12:39pm
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Jul 16, 2025 - 12:27pm
Play the Blues
- black321 - Jul 16, 2025 - 11:06am
Climate Change
- R_P - Jul 16, 2025 - 10:56am
But Why?
- Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2025 - 9:53am
Live Music
- oldviolin - Jul 16, 2025 - 9:53am
NYTimes Connections
- geoff_morphini - Jul 16, 2025 - 9:44am
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - Jul 16, 2025 - 9:41am
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore
- GeneP59 - Jul 16, 2025 - 9:32am
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Jul 16, 2025 - 9:10am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2025 - 7:48am
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - Jul 15, 2025 - 10:46pm
Are they married yet? YES THEY ARE!
- buddy - Jul 15, 2025 - 9:20pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 15, 2025 - 8:41pm
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- R_P - Jul 15, 2025 - 7:07pm
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group
- sunybuny - Jul 15, 2025 - 3:05pm
Beyond mix
- victory806 - Jul 15, 2025 - 12:53pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- Isabeau - Jul 15, 2025 - 12:35pm
Alexa Skill
- buddy - Jul 15, 2025 - 12:12pm
Where is the airplane?
- rgio - Jul 15, 2025 - 9:42am
Gardeners Corner
- Coaxial - Jul 15, 2025 - 6:42am
Trouble with Verizon? Or Tailscale?
- jarro - Jul 15, 2025 - 6:39am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- bobrk - Jul 14, 2025 - 3:56pm
Economix
- R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 3:27pm
Immigration
- R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 3:11pm
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 11:16am
Fox Spews
- R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 10:52am
What is the meaning of this?
- rgio - Jul 14, 2025 - 10:44am
Fascism In America
- Red_Dragon - Jul 14, 2025 - 9:59am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jul 14, 2025 - 8:04am
Why atheists swallow,
- black321 - Jul 14, 2025 - 8:00am
USA! USA! USA!
- ColdMiser - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:57am
On Life as Art- heard it on KTRT 95.7
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:56am
Comics!
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:53am
Music Videos
- black321 - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:51am
M.A.G.A.
- R_P - Jul 13, 2025 - 3:53pm
Infinite cat
- Isabeau - Jul 13, 2025 - 11:37am
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - Jul 13, 2025 - 11:35am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Jul 12, 2025 - 9:16pm
Europe
- R_P - Jul 12, 2025 - 6:30pm
Democratic Party
- R_P - Jul 12, 2025 - 1:37pm
A motivational quote
- steeler - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:58pm
Beyond...
- GeneP59 - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:35pm
Protest Songs
- R_P - Jul 11, 2025 - 12:38pm
True Confessions
- oldviolin - Jul 11, 2025 - 11:56am
Jess Roden - legendary UK vocalist - and "Seven Windows" ...
- J_C - Jul 11, 2025 - 11:22am
It seemed like a good idea at the time
- ptooey - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:10am
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:13pm
TV shows you watch
- R_P - Jul 10, 2025 - 5:31pm
Wasted Money
- GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 5:22pm
Rock mix / repitition
- walk2k - Jul 10, 2025 - 4:31pm
How's the weather?
- GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 3:21pm
Random Solutions - Random Advice
- oldviolin - Jul 10, 2025 - 10:11am
Spambags on RP
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:02am
misheard lyrics
- GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 6:30am
New Song Submissions system
- Teja - Jul 10, 2025 - 3:36am
TEXAS
- Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2025 - 5:57pm
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote')
- black321 - Jul 9, 2025 - 11:33am
Republican Party
- Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2025 - 7:50am
Outstanding Covers
- oldviolin - Jul 8, 2025 - 9:29pm
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jul 8, 2025 - 5:43pm
Love & Hate
- oldviolin - Jul 8, 2025 - 8:15am
Anti-War
- R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 6:45pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
The War On You
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... , 75, 76, 77 Next |
bokey

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 8, 2013 - 8:25am |
|
pigtail wrote: ANOTHER EXMILITARY NUTBAG WITH A RAMBO FETISH You think wearing cammie gear in downtown LA was a giveaway?
|
|
pigtail

Location: Southern California Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 8, 2013 - 8:23am |
|
 ANOTHER EXMILITARY NUTBAG WITH A RAMBO FETISH
|
|
hippiechick

Location: topsy turvy land Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 6, 2013 - 11:47am |
|
bokey wrote: We have to pray or whatever for the health of the Supreme Court Justices that are in their late 70's and hope they are strong enough to hang on for 4 years for the good of the country.
I am looking forward to Obama appointing at least one new justice.
|
|
Manbird

Location: La Villa Toscana Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 6, 2013 - 11:25am |
|
N O T I C E Please deposit your waistcoat in the proper container -SRPD 512a
|
|
sirdroseph

Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 - 2:35pm |
|
Don't waive your rights with your flags. Sage Francis
|
|
bokey

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 - 10:25am |
|
kurtster wrote: Some of us have been talking about this stuff for a long time already until we were blue in the face.
This what the next 4 years is about, stopping this (and lots more) before it goes any further.
Our current POTUS thinks he has a mandate to keep advancing this.
Are you ready to fight the good fight yet ?
We have to pray or whatever for the health of the Supreme Court Justices that are in their late 70's and hope they are strong enough to hang on for 4 years for the good of the country.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 - 9:34am |
|
hippiechick wrote: I am extremely disappointed in this memo. The good part is that it is being exposed. I'm really glad that someone (Michael Issakoff) has taken this on. It's about time we shined a light on this.
Some of us have been talking about this stuff for a long time already until we were blue in the face. This what the next 4 years is about, stopping this (and lots more) before it goes any further. Our current POTUS thinks he has a mandate to keep advancing this. Are you ready to fight the good fight yet ?
|
|
sirdroseph

Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 - 6:57am |
|
Just filed my taxes, yes there is most definitely a war on me that has been declared by the Federal government. 
|
|
hippiechick

Location: topsy turvy land Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 - 6:48am |
|
kurtster wrote:miamizsun wrote:'Due process' is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law. EXCLUSIVE: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on AmericansBy Michael Isikoff National Investigative Correspondent, NBC News A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S. The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes. Thought it worthy of reposting here ... Just another dot in the minds of those who are paying attention. Sadly, just part of someone else's paranoia in the minds of those who chose to believe in other things. Peace  I am extremely disappointed in this memo. The good part is that it is being exposed. I'm really glad that someone (Michael Issakoff) has taken this on. It's about time we shined a light on this.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 - 6:42am |
|
miamizsun wrote:'Due process' is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law. EXCLUSIVE: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on AmericansBy Michael Isikoff National Investigative Correspondent, NBC News A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S. The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes. Thought it worthy of reposting here ... Just another dot in the minds of those who are paying attention. Sadly, just part of someone else's paranoia in the minds of those who chose to believe in other things. Peace
|
|
hippiechick

Location: topsy turvy land Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 11, 2013 - 6:46am |
|
miamizsun wrote:is it me or does this seem very scary? (i mean the potential for abuse is huge) 
Who needs the freaky precogs of Minority Report to predict if someone’s likely to commit murder when you have an algorithm that can do it for you? New crime-prediction software used in Maryland and Pennsylvania, and soon to be rolled out in the nation’s capital too, promises to reduce the homicide rate by predicting which prison parolees are likely to commit murder and therefore receive more stringent supervision. The software aims to replace the judgments parole officers already make based on a parolee’s criminal record and is currently being used in Baltimore and Philadelphia. Richard Berk, a criminologist at the University of Pennsylvania who developed the algorithm, claims it will reduce the murder rate and other crimes and could help courts set bail amounts as well as sentencing in the future. How often does science fiction become fiction? As long as they don't use the wooden balls, so stupid.
|
|
miamizsun

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 11, 2013 - 6:44am |
|
is it me or does this seem very scary? (i mean the potential for abuse is huge) 
Who needs the freaky precogs of Minority Report to predict if someone’s likely to commit murder when you have an algorithm that can do it for you? New crime-prediction software used in Maryland and Pennsylvania, and soon to be rolled out in the nation’s capital too, promises to reduce the homicide rate by predicting which prison parolees are likely to commit murder and therefore receive more stringent supervision. The software aims to replace the judgments parole officers already make based on a parolee’s criminal record and is currently being used in Baltimore and Philadelphia. Richard Berk, a criminologist at the University of Pennsylvania who developed the algorithm, claims it will reduce the murder rate and other crimes and could help courts set bail amounts as well as sentencing in the future.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 6:06am |
|
Zep wrote:Renditions continue under Obama.The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August as they passed through the small African country of Djibouti. But the reason soon became clear when they were visited in their jail cells by a succession of American interrogators. U.S. agents accused the men — two of them Swedes, the other a longtime resident of Britain — of supporting al-Shabab, an Islamist militia in Somalia that Washington considers a terrorist group. Two months after their arrest, the prisoners were secretly indicted by a federal grand jury in New York, then clandestinely taken into custody by the FBI and flown to the United States to face trial.
. . . . . .
But they were suspected terrorists, so that makes it all good, right? Right? Am I right? Right? (is this thing on? tap-tap-tap) RIGHT, everyone, this is ok? Obama ? Isn't he the guy that hunts down American citizens, ignoring the Constitution and due process and kills them with drones ?
|
|
Zep

Location: Funkytown 
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 5:52am |
|
Renditions continue under Obama.The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August as they passed through the small African country of Djibouti. But the reason soon became clear when they were visited in their jail cells by a succession of American interrogators. U.S. agents accused the men — two of them Swedes, the other a longtime resident of Britain — of supporting al-Shabab, an Islamist militia in Somalia that Washington considers a terrorist group. Two months after their arrest, the prisoners were secretly indicted by a federal grand jury in New York, then clandestinely taken into custody by the FBI and flown to the United States to face trial.
. . . . . .
But they were suspected terrorists, so that makes it all good, right? Right? Am I right? Right? (is this thing on? tap-tap-tap) RIGHT, everyone, this is ok?
|
|
bokey

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 5:32am |
|
kurtster wrote: Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.
Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid. I am just aware. A huge difference.
I'll grant you one thing however. What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong. Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.
EdIt: If you don't think it is a problem, then never mind.
We live in a country where our choices for President were Mitt Romney(who I do not care for) or re-elect a child murderer. Our country picked the child murderer. That is when I realized my life is basically over.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 5:27am |
|
helenofjoy wrote: The anger that comes across in many of your posts. Not just this conversation. To call my comment a worn out cliche wasn't exactly constructive.
I took your comment, which was obviously directed at me, as a direct charge that I was living a life filled with fear which directly affects all of my thinking and limits my ability to reason properly. Now that is constructive ? I think that is more of an attack to be used to dismiss all of my thinking regardless of merit. Calling something worn out is tantamount to a personal attack now ? As you wish ...
|
|
helenofjoy

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 5:19am |
|
kurtster wrote:My reply to you was filled with vitriol ? ( Not this particular reply, no. ) and what anger ?  The anger that comes across in many of your posts. Not just this conversation. To call my comment a worn out cliche wasn't exactly constructive.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 5:04am |
|
helenofjoy wrote: Defining the problem doesn't seem to be so difficult - most of us are very aware of what the problems are. It is only your opinion that my statement is a worn out cliche. Your fear is obvious in your anger. If you were not afraid, you would be able to express your thinking without all the insulting vitriol. You would be able to discuss your ideas in a reasonable, respectful tone. If you really expect to get people to "see" what it is you see, you may have to change your approach.
My reply to you was filled with vitriol ? and what anger ?
|
|
helenofjoy

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 4:58am |
|
kurtster wrote: That cliché is so worn out. I could flip it around and say that is the charge against those who think that Global Warming is the greatest danger facing our planet and worth sacrificing everything in order to combat it.
What is the first step in problem solving ? Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.
Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid. I am just aware. A huge difference.
I'll grant you one thing however. What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong. Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.
Defining the problem doesn't seem to be so difficult - most of us are very aware of what the problems are. It is only your opinion that my statement is a worn out cliche. Your fear is obvious in your anger. If you were not afraid, you would be able to express your thinking without all the insulting vitriol. You would be able to discuss your ideas in a reasonable, respectful tone. If you really expect to get people to "see" what it is you see, you may have to change your approach.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 4:49am |
|
helenofjoy wrote:I think it must be horrible to live a life every day filled with fear-based, negative thinking. It leaves no room for creative, positive problem solving.
That cliché is so worn out. I could flip it around and say that is the charge against those who think that Global Warming is the greatest danger facing our planet and worth sacrificing everything in order to combat it. What is the first step in problem solving ? Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem. Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid. I am just aware. A huge difference. I'll grant you one thing however. What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong. Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'. EdIt: If you don't think it is a problem, then never mind.
|
|
|