[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Climate Change - R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 12:42pm
 
But Why? - Proclivities - Jul 14, 2025 - 12:36pm
 
NYTimes Connections - Proclivities - Jul 14, 2025 - 12:11pm
 
The Marie Antoinette Moment... - R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 11:35am
 
Wordle - daily game - marko86 - Jul 14, 2025 - 11:19am
 
Artificial Intelligence - R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 11:16am
 
NY Times Strands - GeneP59 - Jul 14, 2025 - 10:59am
 
Fox Spews - R_P - Jul 14, 2025 - 10:52am
 
What is the meaning of this? - rgio - Jul 14, 2025 - 10:44am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - Jul 14, 2025 - 10:36am
 
Fascism In America - Red_Dragon - Jul 14, 2025 - 9:59am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2025 - 8:40am
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2025 - 8:37am
 
Trump - rgio - Jul 14, 2025 - 8:33am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2025 - 8:04am
 
Why atheists swallow, - black321 - Jul 14, 2025 - 8:00am
 
USA! USA! USA! - ColdMiser - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:57am
 
On Life as Art- heard it on KTRT 95.7 - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:56am
 
Comics! - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:53am
 
Music Videos - black321 - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:51am
 
Economix - black321 - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:11am
 
Beyond mix - ericb - Jul 14, 2025 - 7:01am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jul 14, 2025 - 6:31am
 
July 2025 Photo Theme - Stone - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 14, 2025 - 3:05am
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - buddy - Jul 13, 2025 - 5:49pm
 
M.A.G.A. - R_P - Jul 13, 2025 - 3:53pm
 
Are they married yet? YES THEY ARE! - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 13, 2025 - 3:16pm
 
Israel - R_P - Jul 13, 2025 - 1:15pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - kcar - Jul 13, 2025 - 12:41pm
 
Infinite cat - Isabeau - Jul 13, 2025 - 11:37am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2025 - 11:35am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - GeneP59 - Jul 13, 2025 - 10:10am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Jul 12, 2025 - 9:16pm
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Jul 12, 2025 - 8:39pm
 
Europe - R_P - Jul 12, 2025 - 6:30pm
 
Democratic Party - R_P - Jul 12, 2025 - 1:37pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - machar - Jul 12, 2025 - 12:34pm
 
A motivational quote - steeler - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:58pm
 
Beyond... - GeneP59 - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:35pm
 
Protest Songs - R_P - Jul 11, 2025 - 12:38pm
 
True Confessions - oldviolin - Jul 11, 2025 - 11:56am
 
Jess Roden - legendary UK vocalist - and "Seven Windows" ... - J_C - Jul 11, 2025 - 11:22am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Jul 11, 2025 - 10:13am
 
It seemed like a good idea at the time - ptooey - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:10am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:13pm
 
TV shows you watch - R_P - Jul 10, 2025 - 5:31pm
 
Wasted Money - GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 5:22pm
 
Rock mix / repitition - walk2k - Jul 10, 2025 - 4:31pm
 
How's the weather? - GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 3:21pm
 
Random Solutions - Random Advice - oldviolin - Jul 10, 2025 - 10:11am
 
Spambags on RP - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:02am
 
misheard lyrics - GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 6:30am
 
New Song Submissions system - Teja - Jul 10, 2025 - 3:36am
 
TEXAS - Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2025 - 5:57pm
 
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote') - black321 - Jul 9, 2025 - 11:33am
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2025 - 7:50am
 
Outstanding Covers - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2025 - 9:29pm
 
Trump Lies™ - R_P - Jul 8, 2025 - 7:14pm
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Jul 8, 2025 - 5:43pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Alchemist - Jul 8, 2025 - 11:45am
 
Love & Hate - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2025 - 8:15am
 
Anti-War - R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 6:45pm
 
Environment - R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 5:38pm
 
(Big) Media Watch - R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 12:04pm
 
The Grateful Dead - black321 - Jul 7, 2025 - 11:17am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 7, 2025 - 8:59am
 
Immigration - black321 - Jul 7, 2025 - 8:02am
 
Russia - Red_Dragon - Jul 7, 2025 - 7:39am
 
Triskele and The Grateful Dead - geoff_morphini - Jul 6, 2025 - 10:33pm
 
Hey Baby, It's The 4th O' July - GeneP59 - Jul 6, 2025 - 9:42pm
 
Customize a shirt with my favorite album - 2644364236 - Jul 6, 2025 - 7:20pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - R_P - Jul 6, 2025 - 10:56am
 
Beer - SeriousLee - Jul 6, 2025 - 6:54am
 
Iran - R_P - Jul 5, 2025 - 9:01pm
 
What are you doing RIGHT NOW? - Coaxial - Jul 5, 2025 - 6:48pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Two sexes or ? Gender as a non-binary concept Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Post to this Topic
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2018 - 9:48am

 ziggytrix wrote:

As language evolves meanings change. Why do we have two words: gender AND sex?

My understanding is that "sex" has a scientific connotation. It refers to genotype and phenotype - the reproductive role. Male or female (from Latin roots).

While "gender" is undergoing a semantic shift to a more social connotation. It refers to social function - homemaker or breadwinner (or some other status). Man or woman (from Old English roots) but increasingly other, newer categories.

Not to say this is universally accepted, in fact, far from it. I believe most people still use male and female to describe gender, and therein lies this issue, IMO. We aren't all speaking the same language.

It is quite common in English for two words to have similar but not identical meanings, and even more common for people to disagree on exactly what words mean (often citing whichever dictionary or reference favors their argument).

Some people believe sex and gender are 100% synonymous, some do not. However, language does not respect the opinion of the minority. As times change it really doesn't matter if thousands of years a word meant something, once the paradigm shifts, it means what the consensus (and yes, this need only be a local consensus) understands it to mean. So it goes.

I'm curious about your response to Lazy8's post, tho. I didn't see the words "get over it" in there at all, but in your response you repeat the phase twice as though you were issued it as a command. Why is this? You were asked a reasonable question IMO. If someone who has nothing whatsoever to do with you identifies with a gender that does not match their biology, how are you affected? And how much does that affect weigh on you compared to the affect on them? How, really, does it matter?

 
Just wanted to acknowledge your thoughtful response.  It did not go unread.  We are definitely in the middle of a paradigm shift.


meower

meower Avatar

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe
Gender: Female


Posted: Apr 24, 2018 - 11:49am

 R_P wrote:

My takeaway is that pretty much everything is based on genetic diversity. There aren't only "pure" white and "pure" black people, but instead there are many shades driven by genetic diversity. It would stand to reason that some of that goes on with gender as well.

 
Makes sense to me and, i can think of lots of examples of the shading of gender in the general population.



EDIT: R_P, your comment was really helpful. I'll be reflecting on it


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 24, 2018 - 11:47am

 meower wrote:
exactly. our understanding of the interaction of symptoms is also in it's infancy.
 
My takeaway is that pretty much everything is based on genetic diversity. There aren't only "pure" white and "pure" black people, but instead there are many shades driven by genetic diversity. It would stand to reason that some of that goes on with gender as well.
meower

meower Avatar

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe
Gender: Female


Posted: Apr 24, 2018 - 11:34am

 R_P wrote:

It isn't just the brain that is involved. In other cases than transgender, there are other indicators. Robert Sapolsky repeats the brain statistics, but points out they are but one indicator for one particular case, after he has discussed a bunch of other different cases that rely on chromosomes, or genetic diversity:

(...) This is the transgendered world, and some intriguing science hints at its neurobiological bases. There are a number of places in the human brain that are “sexually

 
exactly. our understanding of the interaction of symptoms is also in it's infancy.


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 24, 2018 - 11:19am

 meower wrote:

while it's nice to find a biological basis to any presenting problem, I think that we have to be really careful about drawing too many conclusions at this point other than that "there appears to be a biological basis to this."

Our knowledge/understanding of the brain is in it's infancy.

 
It isn't just the brain that is involved. In other cases than transgender, there are other indicators. Robert Sapolsky repeats the brain statistics, but points out they are but one indicator for one particular case, after he has discussed a bunch of other different cases that rely on chromosomes, or genetic diversity:

(...) This is the transgendered world, and some intriguing science hints at its neurobiological bases. There are a number of places in the human brain that are “sexually dimorphic” (where the size, structure, function, and/or chemical makeup of the area differ by sex). The differences aren’t big enough so that you could identify someone’s sex just by knowing the size of one of those regions. However, there are statistical differences between populations of men and women, differences with likely functional consequences.

So you have someone who by every measure discussed, from sex chromosomes to phenotype, is Sex A, but who insists that they have always felt like they are Sex B. What’s up in the sexually dimorphic brain regions? A number of studies report the brain bears a close resemblance to Sex B. And this shouldn’t seem surprising—we are determined by our brains, we are our brains, regardless of our pattern of facial hair, the thickness of our larynx, or what the landscape is like between our legs.

In other words, it’s not that transgendered individuals think they are a different gender than they actually are. It’s that they’ve had the profoundly crappy luck to be stuck with bodies that are a different gender from who they actually are.

Slowly, a word becomes pertinent—“continuum.” Gender in humans is on a continuum, coming in scads of variants, where genes, organs, hormones, external appearance, and psychosexual identification can vary independently, and where many people have categories of gender identification going on in their heads (and brains) that bear no resemblance to yours. All with a frequency that, while rare, are no rarer than various human traits we label as “normal.” (...)
One such case, as driven by hormones:
Then there’s cases where a disconnect occurs at the level of hormones. One well-studied example concerns the fact that testosterone exerts some of its effects in target cells by being converted to a related hormone, DHT (dihydrotestosterone)—unless you have a mutation that inactivates the enzyme that does that conversion. This occurs in “5-alpha-reductase deficiency”; the individual is XY, has testes and normal levels of testosterone, but the person’s phenotype—their external appearance—can range from male to ambiguous to female. For those with a predominantly female phenotype at birth, there’s typically masculinization at puberty (the long-hidden testes descend, the clitoris enlarges, voice deepens). Clusters of cases of this disorder have been identified in some inbred, isolated populations (for example, in the mountains of the Dominican Republic) where, remarkably, there’s been a fair degree of cultural accommodation—“Honey, this is called puberty. Sometimes you get acne. Sometimes your clitoris becomes a penis. Whatever.”

meower

meower Avatar

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe
Gender: Female


Posted: Apr 24, 2018 - 10:56am

while it's nice to find a biological basis to any presenting problem, I think that we have to be really careful about drawing too many conclusions at this point other than that "there appears to be a biological basis to this."

Our knowledge/understanding of the brain is in it's infancy.


meower

meower Avatar

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe
Gender: Female


Posted: Apr 24, 2018 - 10:56am

while it's nice to find a biological basis to any presenting problem, I think that we have to be really careful about drawing too many conclusions at this point other than that "there appears to be a biological basis to this."

Our knowledge/understanding of the brain is in it's infancy.


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 24, 2018 - 8:39am

 miamizsun wrote:

a question or two that might come up

what if someone bases gender and or sexual identity simply on personal preference ?

can gender identity change? if so how often? (i used to identify as x, but now i identify as y)

can a human hold more than one identity and who decides this? (i used to identify as x, but now i identify as x and y)

regards
 




From what I gathered is that they are on a track to definitely answer this by brain scans. If this technology and ability pans out, could they not just do the brain scan to determine if someone truly has the condition or is just using the condition for their own personal reasons; virtue signaling, manifestations of abuse and so on or worse parents using their children as political pawns? It would seem to me that if one truly has the brain configuration of dysphoria, if the brain does not change then why should their identity?
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 24, 2018 - 8:29am

 R_P wrote:

What if the state of mind has a biological source?

 
a question or two that might come up

what if someone bases gender and or sexual identity simply on personal preference ?

can gender identity change? if so how often? (i used to identify as x, but now i identify as y)

can a human hold more than one identity and who decides this? (i used to identify as x, but now i identify as x and y)

regards

meower

meower Avatar

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe
Gender: Female


Posted: Apr 24, 2018 - 6:53am

 R_P wrote:

What if the state of mind has a biological source?

 
this is a really good article.


islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 24, 2018 - 6:10am

 kurtster wrote:

I did and do read what you write.  

I already said that I accepted it as a reality.

I did state that I did not jump in here until I saw that the government jumped in and declared it a protected class.

That means rules and regulations will be forthcoming.  That is why it concerns me.  And the basis for asking the questions I posed.

Whenever the government intervenes in a new venue, we all should be concerned, imho.

And I still say that this is just as revolutionary as accepting that the sun does not rotate around the earth in terms of overall social implications.  If nothing else it scientifically challenges religious precepts.  As did the 'discovery' about the relationship between the sun and earth some 400 years ago.

 
Maybe religious precepts aren't the best basis for governing a large and diverse society.

Also, it's government's job to ensure that all its citizens have access to its services. Declaring a protected class is usually done because one part of society is unjustly treating another part. 
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 24, 2018 - 5:26am

 Lazy8 wrote:
kurtster wrote:
It was the what's it to you?  part.  The way he finished it came off as pure dismissive contempt at me based upon prior discussions on other topics with Lazy.  Totally unnecessary.  He made his point very nicely, up until that.

And this should also answer the question immediately below regarding where I came up with the thought about get over it came from.  Again, it was the what's it to you?

Maybe a bit terse, but I was trying to get the point across with few enough words to get them read. Go back to my central thesis about the irrelevance of gender.

This seems to matter a great deal to you. It shouldn't. It's irrelevant.

And yes, you should get over it, but I mean that in the most sympathetic way possible—from someone who had to get over it himself.

 
I did and do read what you write.  

I already said that I accepted it as a reality.

I did state that I did not jump in here until I saw that the government jumped in and declared it a protected class.

That means rules and regulations will be forthcoming.  That is why it concerns me.  And the basis for asking the questions I posed.

Whenever the government intervenes in a new venue, we all should be concerned, imho.

And I still say that this is just as revolutionary as accepting that the sun does not rotate around the earth in terms of overall social implications.  If nothing else it scientifically challenges religious precepts.  As did the 'discovery' about the relationship between the sun and earth some 400 years ago.


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 24, 2018 - 2:30am

 R_P wrote:

What if the state of mind has a biological source?

 
Thank you, this is what I was looking for.  I get it now. We have to look at it as any other brain issue and do the best we can to help them through it.
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 23, 2018 - 9:06pm

kurtster wrote:
It was the what's it to you?  part.  The way he finished it came off as pure dismissive contempt at me based upon prior discussions on other topics with Lazy.  Totally unnecessary.  He made his point very nicely, up until that.

And this should also answer the question immediately below regarding where I came up with the thought about get over it came from.  Again, it was the what's it to you?

Maybe a bit terse, but I was trying to get the point across with few enough words to get them read. Go back to my central thesis about the irrelevance of gender.

This seems to matter a great deal to you. It shouldn't. It's irrelevant.

And yes, you should get over it, but I mean that in the most sympathetic way possible—from someone who had to get over it himself.
FourFortyEight

FourFortyEight Avatar

Location: The Dirty South
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 23, 2018 - 5:28pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
sirdroseph wrote:
It is?? I guess I just don't get where you are coming from. I don't want anything from our government regarding this issue, I agree that government should have nothing to do with this. I am just struggling to understand the gender aspect because I instantly and intrinsically understand all other aspects of sexuality because I have sexuality myself and we humans are all the same, but I do not have a gender, I am a gender and cannot comprehend the difference and guess I never will in regards to all of those that apparently do have the ability to feel gender.

The context I'm talking about.

We've also just lived thru a wave of bathroom bills and the like.

What you're describing is that you are male and feel male, and have never questioned that. Now imagine you looked down in the shower and your body didn't match that identity. That's gender dysphoria, the feeling of body not matching identity.

In your case it would stem from a change (an imaginary one), but most trans people don't have that. Most have felt that way as long as they've been thinking about their gender.

Yeah, for most of us it's hard to imagine, but for those who face that every day it is probably the central conflict of their lives. There are a number of memoirs of people who've lived this; one you might connect with is Deidre McClosky's Crossing: a Memoir.

If it's any comfort you aren't the first person to struggle with understanding this. If you approach it with empathy you can see past your own experience and get some insight. Trans people aren't the punchline of a joke to me, but that wasn't always the case.

 
I don't mean to use such a cheesy movie as a quick reference to perspective (sorry if that even offends - I know.  I liked 'em too), but referring to your context, the "Starship Troopers" flicks take a straight forward aim at gender-equality.  I'd bet trans-gender equality could flourish as well. If the military operated by this, the problem wouldn't exist.  Of course, it could very well introduce a slew of new problems.  What's the answer?  

*Disclaimer*

I intentionally put no heavy duty thought into this response and if it's anyone's concern, I'm going to find that bag of Doritos I just remembered I have in the pantry.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 23, 2018 - 5:16pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

This is interesting. I found Lazy's post to be thoughtful and thought-provoking, and it challenged me a bit.

I did not find it dishonest or impolite.

But you got your back up over it.

We are clearly primitive animals, if we're presented with perfectly reasonable arguments that challenge our worldview and our response is hostility. I'm not judging; I have the same reaction sometimes, and those facebook memes that try to scare us away from this behavior or that rely on our response to be irrational.

 
Nor did I.

It was the what's it to you?  part.  The way he finished it came off as pure dismissive contempt at me based upon prior discussions on other topics with Lazy.  Totally unnecessary.  He made his point very nicely, up until that.

And this should also answer the question immediately below regarding where I came up with the thought about get over it came from.  Again, it was the what's it to you?


ziggytrix

ziggytrix Avatar

Location: Dallas, TX


Posted: Apr 23, 2018 - 4:38pm

 kurtster wrote:
So we now have two cases for gender, eh ?  The biological and self identity.

Or does the biological even matter anymore ?

Or after further thought, does gender only apply to the mental state ? 

If so, how do we describe the physical state and what do we call it ?

In that I mean, how can we ignore the physical reality ?

One is reality and the other is imagined / perceived ...

I remember some 10 or so years ago I put forth the notion somewhere here that reality is a local event and immediately was told I was crazy.

Now it appears to be true.

 
As language evolves meanings change. Why do we have two words: gender AND sex?

My understanding is that "sex" has a scientific connotation. It refers to genotype and phenotype - the reproductive role. Male or female (from Latin roots).

While "gender" is undergoing a semantic shift to a more social connotation. It refers to social function - homemaker or breadwinner (or some other status). Man or woman (from Old English roots) but increasingly other, newer categories.

Not to say this is universally accepted, in fact, far from it. I believe most people still use male and female to describe gender, and therein lies this issue, IMO. We aren't all speaking the same language.

It is quite common in English for two words to have similar but not identical meanings, and even more common for people to disagree on exactly what words mean (often citing whichever dictionary or reference favors their argument).

Some people believe sex and gender are 100% synonymous, some do not. However, language does not respect the opinion of the minority. As times change it really doesn't matter if thousands of years a word meant something, once the paradigm shifts, it means what the consensus (and yes, this need only be a local consensus) understands it to mean. So it goes.

I'm curious about your response to Lazy8's post, tho. I didn't see the words "get over it" in there at all, but in your response you repeat the phase twice as though you were issued it as a command. Why is this? You were asked a reasonable question IMO. If someone who has nothing whatsoever to do with you identifies with a gender that does not match their biology, how are you affected? And how much does that affect weigh on you compared to the affect on them? How, really, does it matter?
Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: The foot of Mount Belzoni
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 23, 2018 - 3:46pm

 haresfur wrote:

Pretty simple: Don't be an asshole to other people. Base how you treat them on their abilities, not on your pre-conceived notions of who they are.

 
That sounds like something HITLER would say!
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 23, 2018 - 3:37pm

 kurtster wrote:

Yes, they were here at RP.

But my questions are serious.  Its not at all about disagreeing or delegitimizing the state of mind that is the source of this discussion.  That is real. 

We apparently have established a new dichotomy.  That being between the biological / factual and perceived.

What are the rules going to be ?  There has to be rules.  As in the link posted by Richard below, transgender is now a protected class.  It was his link that inspired me to ask. That means rules are now required.

I've been following this thread and get the idea and accept it.  Until seeing the link below I saw no reason to get into this thread.  Now I have one.

 
Pretty simple: Don't be an asshole to other people. Base how you treat them on their abilities, not on your pre-conceived notions of who they are.
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 23, 2018 - 11:36am

 kurtster wrote:
 

So much for polite and honest discussion or in other words, never mind.  At least I made an effort to try to learn and gain an understanding of a revolutionary development that challenges thousands of years of conventional thinking. 

Have a nice day.

 
This is interesting. I found Lazy's post to be thoughtful and thought-provoking, and it challenged me a bit. I did not find it dishonest or impolite. But you got your back up over it. We are clearly primitive animals, if we're presented with perfectly reasonable arguments that challenge our worldview and our response is hostility. I'm not judging; I have the same reaction sometimes, and those facebook memes that try to scare us away from this behavior or that rely on our response to be irrational.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next