Hey Baby, It's The 4th O' July
- islander - Jul 4, 2025 - 4:54pm
Russia
- islander - Jul 4, 2025 - 4:51pm
Trump
- islander - Jul 4, 2025 - 4:49pm
July 2025 Photo Theme - Stone
- fractalv - Jul 4, 2025 - 2:46pm
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - Jul 4, 2025 - 2:20pm
Britain
- R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 1:41pm
Name My Band
- oldviolin - Jul 4, 2025 - 1:31pm
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 11:39am
Ukraine
- R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 11:10am
Democratic Party
- R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 10:54am
NY Times Strands
- maryte - Jul 4, 2025 - 9:48am
NYTimes Connections
- maryte - Jul 4, 2025 - 9:24am
Mixtape Culture Club
- ColdMiser - Jul 4, 2025 - 8:08am
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Jul 4, 2025 - 6:52am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Jul 4, 2025 - 6:36am
Beer
- SeriousLee - Jul 4, 2025 - 6:33am
Best Song Comments.
- 2644364236 - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:32pm
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:29pm
Customize a shirt with my favorite album
- eve0 - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:13pm
Republican Party
- Red_Dragon - Jul 3, 2025 - 7:27pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 3, 2025 - 3:49pm
M.A.G.A.
- islander - Jul 3, 2025 - 1:53pm
Immigration
- R_P - Jul 3, 2025 - 1:23pm
The Obituary Page
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:27am
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:23am
Israel
- R_P - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:10am
Documentaries
- Proclivities - Jul 3, 2025 - 9:31am
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- Steely_D - Jul 3, 2025 - 8:36am
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote')
- black321 - Jul 3, 2025 - 7:40am
Love & Hate
- miamizsun - Jul 3, 2025 - 7:15am
Copyright and theft
- black321 - Jul 3, 2025 - 6:48am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- wossName - Jul 3, 2025 - 6:30am
Trump Lies™
- R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 5:01pm
Outstanding Covers
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:38pm
Protest Songs
- R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:20pm
Fox Spews
- islander - Jul 2, 2025 - 10:39am
Music Videos
- black321 - Jul 2, 2025 - 8:02am
Economix
- rgio - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:37am
New Music
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:30am
Carmen to Stones
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 1, 2025 - 7:44pm
Climate Change
- R_P - Jul 1, 2025 - 5:27pm
Baseball, anyone?
- rgio - Jul 1, 2025 - 11:06am
President(s) Musk/Trump
- VV - Jul 1, 2025 - 8:10am
June 2025 Photo Theme - Arches
- Alchemist - Jun 30, 2025 - 9:10pm
Please help me find this song
- LazyEmergency - Jun 30, 2025 - 8:42pm
Forum Posting Guidelines
- rickylee123 - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:17pm
Thanks William!
- buddy - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:49pm
Living in America
- R_P - Jun 30, 2025 - 3:15pm
Gardeners Corner
- marko86 - Jun 30, 2025 - 10:39am
Comics!
- Red_Dragon - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:59am
Birthday wishes
- Coaxial - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:36am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:39am
Global Mix renaming
- frazettaart - Jun 29, 2025 - 9:23am
Iran
- R_P - Jun 28, 2025 - 8:56pm
Live Music
- Steely_D - Jun 28, 2025 - 6:53pm
What Are You Going To Do Today?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 28, 2025 - 10:17am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jun 28, 2025 - 9:52am
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jun 27, 2025 - 3:00pm
Know your memes
- oldviolin - Jun 27, 2025 - 11:41am
What Makes You Sad?
- oldviolin - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:41am
Calling all Monty Python fans!
- FeydBaron - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:30am
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- R_P - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:23am
SCOTUS
- Red_Dragon - Jun 27, 2025 - 8:30am
Framed - movie guessing game
- Proclivities - Jun 27, 2025 - 6:25am
Yummy Snack
- Proclivities - Jun 26, 2025 - 1:17pm
Parents and Children
- kurtster - Jun 26, 2025 - 11:32am
What Makes You Laugh?
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 25, 2025 - 9:36pm
PUNS- Political Punditry and so-called journalism
- oldviolin - Jun 25, 2025 - 12:06pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 11:30am
What The Hell Buddy?
- oldviolin - Jun 25, 2025 - 10:32am
Astronomy!
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 8:58am
The Grateful Dead
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 7:13am
Billionaires
- R_P - Jun 24, 2025 - 4:57pm
Great guitar faces
- Steely_D - Jun 24, 2025 - 4:15pm
Buying a Cell Phone
- Steely_D - Jun 24, 2025 - 3:05pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Trump
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 1042, 1043, 1044 ... 1347, 1348, 1349 Next |
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 6:10pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
As well as Mormanphobic.
Don't know much about Mormons, hm?
|
|
Dragonfly_Launch

Location: Conway, Ar Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 6:03pm |
|
kurtster wrote: That's Islamaphobic !
As well as Mormanphobic.
Bigot.
So much for the tolerant left ...
Am I not also Christianophobic and Jesusophobic? Don't leave out any misguided labels.
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 5:39pm |
|
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 5:34pm |
|
Dragonfly_Launch wrote: Don't trust a man who never has a drink.
That's Islamaphobic ! As well as Mormonphobic. Bigot. So much for the tolerant left ...
|
|
kcar


|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 4:25pm |
|
kurtster wrote: Sorry the base is not what you think it is. You're right we don't want to boot them. We just want the system fixed and enforced. And we are tired of waiting. Obama promised to get it done in his first year. Looking back, it was the last thing he wanted to do. He just delighted in planting all these Constitutional problems to go off like bombs after he was out of office. He invested in causing future litigation as a means to slow down the processes, weaken Congress with the cause of social justice as the justification. He did nothing at the border other than open it up and run guns to Mexico. What a guy.
The only thing holding back our cooperation is build the wall. and you'll get whiplash from watching how fast the discussion changes to getting things fixed. Its been that way for decades. But rather than engage us, its been demonizing by the deliberate conflation of opposition to illegal immigration with all immigration and xenophobia, etc.
Or do you really want to fix the system ? or let things go like they are and just sorta kinda do work arounds and just let it happen so you can feel good and let the best intentions be all that matters. There's a whole bunch of people who think that is the case.
"Sorry the base is not what you think it is."
Take it up with the pollsters. "He just delighted in planting all these Constitutional problems to go off like bombs after he was out of office. He invested in causing future litigation as a means to slow down the processes, weaken Congress with the cause of social justice as the justification."
I expect more from you than the kind of unsupported rant that the weasel Dinesh D'Souza would try to foist on gullible idiots. The only thing holding back our cooperation is build the wall.
Cooperation...on what issue/s? The Dreamer thing? What a stupid idea to link The Wall and Dreamers together.
And do you still not understand that The Wall is not going to fix illegal entry into this country? Btw illegal entry has declined precipitously the last time I checked. From what I can remember much of the increase in illegal immigration from Latin America in the middle of the last decade had to do with violence in Mexico and an unusually large demographic bulge of Mexicans from their late teens to their mid-twenties, the prime age group who attempt illegal entry).
Or do you really want to fix the system ?
I think the majority of us want this.
|
|
Dragonfly_Launch

Location: Conway, Ar Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 4:16pm |
|
kurtster wrote: Yeah, right. He appears to give a damn about what's important to me and a very large number of people. Its just not your people.
We have had kick the can for the past 3 administrations. The national policy on everything has been appeasement, both foreignly and domestically. We've kicked the can on everything. And taxed everything to death.
One reason I voted for Trump was to have the best person available to be the one to pick up the cans. No one has stepped up and clearly there are no traditional politicians able to do so or it would have been done already. I like what Trump has done on the military defensive side of things so far.
We can no longer appease NOKO. They now have a nuke that can deliver one hell of an EMP and reach the US Mainland. That is the worst possible case scenario. An EMP weapon is the greatest national security threat we face. It is not climate change as Obama, et al have tried to convince everyone. Climate change has been the scare tactic used to keep everyone from paying attention to the important stuff. I've been talking about it for at least 5 years since I became aware of it. But I've been dismissed here as a fear monger or conspiracy theorist every time I mention it. Back then the estimated cost of hardening our electricity grid was about $2 billion dollars. Its now about $10 b.
All chubby cheeks has to do is get the thing to go off 200 miles above us and he can knock out half the country's electricity and kill electronic devices permanently that are within the pulse. That would send the USA into the stoneage, killing 10's of millions in the resulting social chaos and disorder that would last for years. He would get us to kill ourselves. If its him or us, its him. Sorry about their neighborhood, but that's how I feel about it.
All roads to NOKO go through China. Either they take him out or we do. I ain't holding my breath for China to do anything here.
Like Hillary would be a better option right now ? Given the circumstances, I feel a whole lot better with Trump in charge than if she would be. We would be right where we are right now regardless of who won. Chubby Cheeks is pointing a gun at our heads and making us defend ourselves.
"A very large number of people"? Like at the ceremony? Less than 35% is it. That is as big as your group gets. Climate deniers. Trump psychosis deniers. And Yes on the Hillary question. Because she would have super intelligent people working on the question 24 hours a day. Trump has no one. Literally. "Let me ask my daughter, hold on." You and the rest of your ilk need to understand— it is not moral to drop heavy atomics and arrays of super bombs on the people of North Korea. They are victims. Excision. Assasination. That is what you are asking. And clearly that is tougher. You don't think we have some fine drones over NK all the time. And we haven't tried? This is America. And Trump? Don't trust a man who never has a drink.
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 4:09pm |
|
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 3:35pm |
|
kcar wrote: Trump doesn't even benefit by satisfying his base, because it's largely opposed to deporting the Dreamers: Sorry the base is not what you think it is. You're right we don't want to boot them. We just want the system fixed and enforced. And we are tired of waiting. Obama promised to get it done in his first year. Looking back, it was the last thing he wanted to do. He just delighted in planting all these Constitutional problems to go off like bombs after he was out of office. He invested in causing future litigation as a means to slow down the processes, weaken Congress with the cause of social justice as the justification. He did nothing at the border other than open it up and run guns to Mexico. What a guy. The only thing holding back our cooperation is build the wall. and you'll get whiplash from watching how fast the discussion changes to getting things fixed. Its been that way for decades. But rather than engage us, its been demonizing by the deliberate conflation of opposition to illegal immigration with all immigration and xenophobia, etc. Or do you really want to fix the system ? or let things go like they are and just sorta kinda do work arounds and just let it happen so you can feel good and let the best intentions be all that matters. There's a whole bunch of people who think that is the case.
|
|
VV

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 3:02pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote: VV wrote:For the same reason many of this other initiatives have stalled. He has the attention span of a goldfish and if he doesn't see immediate results / gratification, he simply moves on to the next shiny object. I have a simpler explanation: the only one who hadn't figured out immigration was Trump, and there never was a problem to solve. That works too... ;)
|
|
steeler

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth 
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 2:40pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote: steeler wrote:Yes. The question becomes: Has there been any evidence that the lack of implementation of this travel ban has resulted in terrorist actions within the country or otherwise placed Americans in danger? If not, then it would seem that the assessment that such a ban was critical and time was of the essence in implementing it was flawed. The original executive order was for a 90 day moratorium while "we figure this thing out." It was of the utmost importance. Top national security priority—we were all at risk of terrorist attack under the old regime. He's had much more than 90 days since taking office. If it was such a high priority why hasn't it been addressed already? Exactly.
|
|
kcar


|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 2:24pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote: VV wrote:For the same reason many of this other initiatives have stalled. He has the attention span of a goldfish and if he doesn't see immediate results / gratification, he simply moves on to the next shiny object. I have a simpler explanation: the only one who hadn't figured out immigration was Trump, and there never was a problem to solve.  Trump doesn't even benefit by satisfying his base, because it's largely opposed to deporting the Dreamers: Poll: Majority opposes deporting DreamersA majority of voters, 58 percent, think these undocumented immigrants, also known as Dreamers, should be allowed to stay and become citizens if they meet certain requirements — a sentiment that goes well beyond the existing DACA program. Another 18 percent think they should be allowed to stay and become legal residents, but not citizens. Only 15 percent think they should be removed or deported from the country....“Given the deeply polarizing nature of immigration issues, the broad support for allowing Dreamers to stay in the United States is notable,” said Morning Consult co-founder and Chief Research Officer Kyle Dropp. “Just 24 percent of Republicans, 12 percent of independents and 8 percent of Democrats say that Dreamers should be deported.” The same holds true for Trump’s electoral base. Two-thirds of self-identified Trump voters think the Dreamers should stay; only 26 percent think they should be deported. ...More broadly, the poll shows voters are supportive of allowing undocumented immigrants to remain in the U.S. if they meet certain obligations. Asked the best way to handle immigrants living in the U.S. illegally, nearly half, 49 percent, think they should be allowed to stay and become citizens if they meet certain requirements. Another 21 percent think they should be allowed to stay and become legal residents, but not citizens. Just 22 percent think they should be deported. Even among Trump’s base, fewer than half of Republicans (37 percent), Trump voters (39 percent) and those who strongly approve of his job performance (45 percent) think undocumented immigrants should be deported or removed.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 2:10pm |
|
pigtail wrote: I think you just like to argue these ridiculous claims over and over again to fill an empty part of your day because honestly they make no rational sense. I know you are going through a lot medically, and I can understand your need to do this but honestly it gets tiresome. I hope you start to feel better soon and can leave this ridiculousness to some backwater hic that marches with a torch and screams about Jews, Muslims, Mexicans, women....etc and anyone that isn't a right wing republican, straight white American male.
Really ? Thanks for the white liberal guilt excuse that would explain me away. You forget where I'm from. There's a whole boatload of my hs classmates that feel much the same as I do. And a few who don't, but most of them do. If the OC is a backwater, then you're a hic, too. Oh wait, you've managed to sweep all those OCR's* under the rug and taken the county over and made it a better place. * orange county republicans ...
 Edit: oh, wait, it was a backwater back then ... cows in the field by the jr hs. and can you imagine no traffic lights on PCH between the Highlands and the other side of Emerald Bay in Laguna ? And no buildings in between other than The Shake Shack and the trailer park at El Morro. I rode the Greyhound down PCH back and forth to Laguna, we didn't have any city buses back then. Ya, it was a backwater ... til the easterners arrived ... ooh, ooh ... I just remembered when Nixon stayed a few days down in the Shores at his brother's place (whose kid went to Corona, the wife dated him in hs) when he was running for prez in the summer of 68. I had my first run in with the Secret Service at 15 when they stopped me walking back from the Cove up the hill on the way home. They asked me what I was doing around "here". I said "I live here, who the fuck are you ?". So maybe we weren't really a backwater back then ... must be the meds ... but it was fun to go down memory lane and remind me of where I came from and how it shaped my mind and many others. I bet you think we burned crosses down at the cove at night instead of driftwood and old tires.
|
|
Lazy8

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 2:02pm |
|
VV wrote:For the same reason many of this other initiatives have stalled. He has the attention span of a goldfish and if he doesn't see immediate results / gratification, he simply moves on to the next shiny object. I have a simpler explanation: the only one who hadn't figured out immigration was Trump, and there never was a problem to solve.
|
|
VV

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 1:45pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote: steeler wrote:Yes. The question becomes: Has there been any evidence that the lack of implementation of this travel ban has resulted in terrorist actions within the country or otherwise placed Americans in danger? If not, then it would seem that the assessment that such a ban was critical and time was of the essence in implementing it was flawed. The original executive order was for a 90 day moratorium while "we figure this thing out." It was of the utmost importance. Top national security priority—we were all at risk of terrorist attack under the old regime. He's had much more than 90 days since taking office. If it was such a high priority why hasn't it been addressed already? For the same reason many of this other initiatives have stalled. He has the attention span of a goldfish and if he doesn't see immediate results / gratification, he simply moves on to the next shiny object. His priorities change by the hour which really means he has none... remember when peace in the Middle East was a priority and he put his son-in-law in charge of getting that going? Wonder where that stands or if it is even on his radar anymore? Same with putting Kushner and Christie in charge of finding solutions for the opioid epidemic... they have already missed a few self-imposed reporting deadlines. Does anyone really believe that anything substantial will come of that? This administration is full of failed attempts to get things done and the list for the wall-of-shame grows ever larger. I think I want Ben Carson's job... that guy has been able to draw a nice paycheck without any real scrutiny.
|
|
Lazy8

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 12:25pm |
|
steeler wrote:Yes. The question becomes: Has there been any evidence that the lack of implementation of this travel ban has resulted in terrorist actions within the country or otherwise placed Americans in danger? If not, then it would seem that the assessment that such a ban was critical and time was of the essence in implementing it was flawed. The original executive order was for a 90 day moratorium while "we figure this thing out." It was of the utmost importance. Top national security priority—we were all at risk of terrorist attack under the old regime. He's had much more than 90 days since taking office. If it was such a high priority why hasn't it been addressed already?
|
|
steeler

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth 
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 11:49am |
|
aflanigan wrote:
The Muslim ban is just one of several pieces of evidence demonstrating inability to govern available from Trump's short, chaotic, ineffectual tenure as POTUS.
The issue is effective leadership. The Muslim travel ban fiasco exposed for all the world to see that he has none. The supposed need for the ban was that bad hombres were streaming into the US, so executive action was required to get an immediate, temporary ban into effect. They failed to draft one capable of passing the sniff test, something other presidents have done when they have actual evidence to back up their claims of urgent need (like Obama's 2011 immigration restrictions based on a specific threat) and have declined to ask the Supreme Court for a quick ruling (a fact that the Supreme Court noted back in June). It's lack of constitutionality is moot at this point. He claimed something needed to be done right away to keep out terrorists, and proceeded to fail to accomplish any prompt action.
Yes. The question becomes: Has there been any evidence that the lack of implementation of this travel ban has resulted in terrorist actions within the country or otherwise placed Americans in danger? If not, then it would seem that the assessment that such a ban was critical and time was of the essence in implementing it was flawed.
|
|
pigtail

Location: Southern California Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 11:45am |
|
kurtster wrote: The travel ban, which y'all base your early claims of Trump's lack of a grasp on what is Constitutional and what isn't, is at the SCOTUS waiting for a decision. I'm pretty sure he will be upheld when its over. Then what will you say ?
I think you just like to argue these ridiculous claims over and over again to fill an empty part of your day because honestly they make no rational sense. I know you are going through a lot medically, and I can understand your need to do this but honestly it gets tiresome. I hope you start to feel better soon and can leave this ridiculousness to some backwater hic that marches with a torch and screams about Jews, Muslims, Mexicans, women....etc and anyone that isn't a right wing republican, straight white American male.
|
|
aflanigan

Location: At Sea Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 10:39am |
|
kurtster wrote: The travel ban, which y'all base your early claims of Trump's lack of a grasp on what is Constitutional and what isn't, is at the SCOTUS waiting for a decision. I'm pretty sure he will be upheld when its over. Then what will you say ?
The Muslim ban is just one of several pieces of evidence demonstrating inability to govern available from Trump's short, chaotic, ineffectual tenure as POTUS. The issue is effective leadership. The Muslim travel ban fiasco exposed for all the world to see that he has none. The supposed need for the ban was that bad hombres were streaming into the US, so executive action was required to get an immediate, temporary ban into effect. They failed to draft one capable of passing the sniff test, something other presidents have done when they have actual evidence to back up their claims of urgent need (like Obama's 2011 immigration restrictions based on a specific threat) and have declined to ask the Supreme Court for a quick ruling (a fact that the Supreme Court noted back in June). It's lack of constitutionality is moot at this point. He claimed something needed to be done right away to keep out terrorists, and proceeded to fail to accomplish any prompt action.
|
|
steeler

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth 
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 9:45am |
|
kurtster wrote: The travel ban, which y'all base your early claims of Trump's lack of a grasp on what is Constitutional and what isn't, is at the SCOTUS waiting for a decision. I'm pretty sure he will be upheld when its over. Then what will you say ?
I think Aflanigan was referring to the fact that Trump unveiled the "Muslim ban" as one of the first things he did, taking even those within his administration by surprise, including members of the Department of Justice. The version that is before the Supreme Court is a revised version — they gave up on the first one that was rushed out
|
|
Proclivities

Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 6, 2017 - 9:39am |
|
kurtster wrote: The travel ban, which y'all base your early claims of Trump's lack of a grasp on what is Constitutional and what isn't, is at the SCOTUS waiting for a decision. I'm pretty sure he will be upheld when its over. Then what will you say ?
There's no doubt that a President has the authority to enact a travel ban, and unless the court can establish that he enacted it purely based on religion, they probably could not deem it unconstitutional. It's also within his authority to pardon a racist, convicted criminal before sentencing; what do people say about that?
|
|
|