Ukraine
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:51pm
Wordle - daily game
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 10:54pm
Breaking News
- kurtster - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:31pm
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:27pm
Derplahoma!
- Red_Dragon - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:11pm
NYTimes Connections
- n4ku - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:03pm
Uploading Music
- macadavy - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:18pm
Baseball, anyone?
- zevon - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:17pm
Oldest Rock song on RP
- johkir - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:07pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:28pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:10pm
Orbiting Earth
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:19pm
YouTube: Music-Videos
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:17pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:13pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:06pm
Israel
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:03pm
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
Irony 101
- MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:15pm
RP automation with iOS Shortcuts App
- pradler4kant - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:57am
The Obituary Page
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:31am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:27am
March 2024 Photo Theme - Many
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:07am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- Beaker - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:30am
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:37am
Radio Paradise Comments
- pilgrim - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:19am
Business as Usual
- black321 - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:09am
Trump
- rgio - Mar 28, 2024 - 7:29am
Outstanding Covers
- thisbody - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:51am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:28am
Little known information...maybe even facts
- haresfur - Mar 27, 2024 - 6:21pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 3:48pm
Please Don't Post Here
- Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2024 - 11:02am
Motivational Office Cliches...
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2024 - 10:20pm
(Big) Media Watch
- Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2024 - 6:18pm
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- islander - Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am
Is there any DOG news out there?
- Beez - Mar 26, 2024 - 7:24am
Food
- Steely_D - Mar 26, 2024 - 1:41am
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands)
- kingen - Mar 25, 2024 - 2:43pm
China
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:59am
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:20am
Play history seems to indicate that I"m streaming 24/7, b...
- jarro - Mar 25, 2024 - 10:44am
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse
- Coaxial - Mar 24, 2024 - 6:22pm
New Music
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 24, 2024 - 5:07pm
Dental Floss Tycoons, and other Montana Myths, Facts, and...
- Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2024 - 12:32pm
Basketball
- oldviolin - Mar 23, 2024 - 2:50pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
Joe Biden
- kurtster - Mar 23, 2024 - 11:17am
Technical Streaming Note for Nerdy RP DIYers
- sjagminas1 - Mar 23, 2024 - 10:16am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Proclivities - Mar 23, 2024 - 8:56am
Other Medical Stuff
- Antigone - Mar 22, 2024 - 3:06pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- oldviolin - Mar 22, 2024 - 11:06am
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- Red_Dragon - Mar 22, 2024 - 9:17am
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones
- Bill_J - Mar 21, 2024 - 8:54pm
Can you afford to retire?
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 21, 2024 - 2:15pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 21, 2024 - 11:10am
What Did You See Today?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 20, 2024 - 5:13pm
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 20, 2024 - 4:31pm
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- Antigone - Mar 20, 2024 - 3:10pm
Russia
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 20, 2024 - 11:44am
2024 Elections!
- Lazy8 - Mar 20, 2024 - 7:26am
Economix
- R_P - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:36pm
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:53am
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:12am
New Forum Member on "What Makes RP Great"
- miamizsun - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:38am
Cache stopped working on old Android Phone
- Eisenwindel - Mar 19, 2024 - 1:50am
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- Bill_J - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:23pm
Damn Dinosaurs!
- oldviolin - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:16pm
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- geoff_morphini - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:58pm
Great guitar faces
- skyguy - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:33pm
Despots, dictators and war criminals
- R_P - Mar 18, 2024 - 12:41pm
Media Matters
- thisbody - Mar 18, 2024 - 10:03am
NASA & other news from space
- miamizsun - Mar 18, 2024 - 4:13am
MEALTICKET
- drinpt - Mar 17, 2024 - 4:13am
What makes you smile?
- Steely_D - Mar 16, 2024 - 7:31pm
|
Index »
Entertainment »
Books »
Writers Networking Forum
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ... 18, 19, 20 Next |
winter
Location: in exile, as always Gender:
|
Posted:
Aug 30, 2011 - 7:46pm |
|
oldslabsides wrote:Okay, this idea had been rolling around my head long enough. Maybe it's time I started writing it down. Do it.
|
|
ptooey
Location: right behind you. no, over there. Gender:
|
Posted:
Aug 30, 2011 - 7:46pm |
|
oldslabsides wrote:Okay, this idea had been rolling around my head long enough. Maybe it's time I started writing it down.
Yes. It is time.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Aug 30, 2011 - 7:44pm |
|
Okay, this idea had been rolling around my head long enough. Maybe it's time I started writing it down.
|
|
Alexandra
Location: PNW Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 6, 2011 - 4:59pm |
|
My novel-in-progress is going to get a major overhaul.
I need to switch some characters around and add some things to their lives that I know personally (because write about what you know, right?). Like dementia. And Multiple System Atrophy. These are compelling things that will grab readers more deeply...and I can tell them from a firsthand POV. But what a challenge. Okay, here goes....
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 26, 2010 - 5:31pm |
|
Xeric wrote: ...Interesting, Proclivities. I, too, prefer art that does something more than perfect representation of "reality." Then again, I do like it to get very, very close (that is, I don't much care for—-even if I'm impressed by the technical skill of—"photorealism.") And yet I'd insist on perfect grammar. Interesting.
Well, they are different methods of communication, as is music too, of course. Certain writers are often too wordy for my tastes as well: Pardon my apparent blasphemy, but even Charles Dickens sometimes seemed like he took three paragraphs to describe something as minor as a visitor's ascot, when one or two sentences could have done the job. My artwork has always been primarily depictive, with occasional forays into more abstractly non-depictive work, but for me the work is frequently "narrative" in nature. My being a trained and adept draftsman has often made the depictive work my personal vocabulary.
|
|
Xeric
Location: Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 26, 2010 - 9:53am |
|
sirdroseph wrote:Actually a good local example is dotman, if dotman used perfect grammar his poems would lose much of their power. Viva freedom of expression!
I love and have encouraged dot's poetry here—I think it's actually quite good.
Poetry, though . . . that's its own ball of wax.
Interesting, Proclivities. I, too, prefer art that does something more than perfect representation of "reality." Then again, I do like it to get very, very close (that is, I don't much care for—-even if I'm impressed by the technical skill of—"photorealism.") And yet I'd insist on perfect grammar. Interesting.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 26, 2010 - 9:46am |
|
Actually a good local example is dotman, if dotman used perfect grammar his poems would lose much of their power. Viva freedom of expression!
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 26, 2010 - 9:35am |
|
Xeric wrote:
" . . . the message" and, *especially*, "the style of the message" ARE CONVEYED BY GRAMMAR. I have said for many years that I value my mastery of grammar (and usage, etc.) because it lets me force you to read my words the way I want them read. Those rules are the writer's means of control. A few masters (among whom I do not, personally, rank Kerouac) can bend the rules in such a way that you, the reader, still choose or are forced to get the intended meaning (and nuance, and etc.), but damned few. The rest of us either master the rules or risk spouting gibberish. Also: internet forums are not formal. They are *public*, and that's where I'd draw the line. If U wnt 2 right lk a klown in ur privit jrnl, have at it. If you want me to read it, and to read it was you meant it read, step up to the plate.
sirdroseph wrote:Well, good for you! However, it is rare that I cannot make out the meaning regardless of the technical precision of the grammar. If you have to have your language that precise to understand the meaning than I suppose perfect grammar is what you require and demand. Personally, I have more important things to worry about than the technical precision of every word. I am just a simple commoner tryin to get through the day. I personally prefer correct grammar, especially if I'm the one doing the writing. However, I have read and enjoyed many works which were not written in perfect grammar. The 'message' is ultimately the most important part of literature and visual art as well, but I tend to have a hard time going through poorly written material after a while - the same as how I lack patience for poorly executed or composed artwork (unless that is the specific intent). In terms of visual art though, I find ultra-technical genres like photo-realism to be largely soulless and unengaging - though perhaps that is part of the intent from those artists. By the same token, I find some literary works to be over-written.I have always found it interesting that two of the finest (relatively modern) writers of English prose - Joseph Conrad and Vladimir Nabokov - did not learn English until later in life.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 26, 2010 - 9:35am |
|
Xeric wrote:Let me put that another way.
I don't want you to "make out" your version of my meaning. I want you to read my meaning exactly. Grammar helps to ensure that happening.
I understand, but the way you phrased it initially made your meaning sound a little condescending so perhaps perfect grammar isn't everything.
|
|
Xeric
Location: Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 26, 2010 - 9:30am |
|
Let me put that another way.
I don't want you to "make out" your version of my meaning. I want you to read my meaning exactly. Grammar helps to ensure that happening.
|
|
Xeric
Location: Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 26, 2010 - 9:29am |
|
sirdroseph wrote: Well, good for you! However, it is rare that I cannot make out the meaning regardless of the technical precision of the grammar. If you have to have your language that precise to understand the meaning than I suppose perfect grammar is what you require and demand. Personally, I have more important things to worry about than the technical precision of every word. I am just a simple commoner tryin to get through the day.
You miss my point entirely, which may well be my bad (to use a term I loathe).
Yes, you can make out SOME meaning, of course. If I want you to get the particular meaning *I* was hoping you'd get, then I'll use the rules of grammar and usage and rhetoric to try to see that that happens.
Or let me turn that around: if you (generically speaking) want me to take a particular meaning (and to take you seriously), you'll make an effort to use the language according to established convention. If you (again, generically, not you sirdroseph specifically) can't be bothered to make that effort (the point of "effort" being that perfection is not required), I'll be oh so disinclined to take you seriously.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 26, 2010 - 9:15am |
|
Xeric wrote:
" . . . the message" and, *especially*, "the style of the message" ARE CONVEYED BY GRAMMAR.
I have said for many years that I value my mastery of grammar (and usage, etc.) because it lets me force you to read my words the way I want them read. Those rules are the writer's means of control. A few masters (among whom I do not, personally, rank Kerouac) can bend the rules in such a way that you, the reader, still choose or are forced to get the intended meaning (and nuance, and etc.), but damned few. The rest of us either master the rules or risk spouting gibberish.
Also: internet forums are not formal. They are *public*, and that's where I'd draw the line. If U wnt 2 right lk a klown in ur privit jrnl, have at it. If you want me to read it, and to read it was you meant it read, step up to the plate.
Well, good for you! However, it is rare that I cannot make out the meaning regardless of the technical precision of the grammar. If you have to have your language that precise to understand the meaning than I suppose perfect grammar is what you require and demand. Personally, I have more important things to worry about than the technical precision of every word. I am just a simple commoner tryin to get through the day.
|
|
Alexandra
Location: PNW Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 26, 2010 - 8:10am |
|
JrzyTmata wrote:I'm with you on gifting. I hate that word. My former supervisor at the spa in SB actually told me, "It's Sunday morning, and people are still spa-ing before they go back to LA."
|
|
Xeric
Location: Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 26, 2010 - 8:10am |
|
sirdroseph wrote: Well, you probably do not like Jack Kerouac. That is fine, but I do and think the beauty or power of the description far outweighs the grammatical correctness of the writing. To me, in the context of entertainment writing for others; i.e. novels, short stories and so forth, grammar is almost irrelevant, the message and style of the message is what is important. However, in formal publications, columns and so forth, I agree, grammar should be correct. My 2. Edit: forums do not qualify as formal publications!
" . . . the message" and, *especially*, "the style of the message" ARE CONVEYED BY GRAMMAR.
I have said for many years that I value my mastery of grammar (and usage, etc.) because it lets me force you to read my words the way I want them read. Those rules are the writer's means of control. A few masters (among whom I do not, personally, rank Kerouac) can bend the rules in such a way that you, the reader, still choose or are forced to get the intended meaning (and nuance, and etc.), but damned few. The rest of us either master the rules or risk spouting gibberish.
Also: internet forums are not formal. They are *public*, and that's where I'd draw the line. If U wnt 2 right lk a klown in ur privit jrnl, have at it. If you want me to read it, and to read it was you meant it read, step up to the plate.
|
|
JrzyTmata
|
Posted:
Nov 26, 2010 - 7:09am |
|
AliGator wrote:Lots of people seem to not care about spelling, grammar, and punctuation, and it also seems they have the attitude that "you know what I meant to say, so it doesn't matter." It grates on those of us who like precision in language. And I'm not a prescriptivist; I let some things slide. (The verbing of nouns? Let's get over it. Except for "gifting" — I haaaate that.) I don't think we can blame either text messaging or the teachers. Let's blame it on apathy. Congrats to your son on his CAPES, and best of luck to him. I'm with you on gifting. I hate that word.
|
|
AliGator
|
Posted:
Nov 23, 2010 - 4:16pm |
|
sirdroseph wrote: Well, you probably do not like Jack Kerouac. That is fine, but I do and think the beauty or power of the description far outweighs the grammatical correctness of the writing. To me, in the context of entertainment writing for others; i.e. novels, short stories and so forth, grammar is almost irrelevant, the message and style of the message is what is important. However, in formal publications, columns and so forth, I agree, grammar should be correct. My 2. Edit: forums do not qualify as formal publications! Writers who take grammatical liberties are a whole other ball of wax.
|
|
Cynaera
Location: Oh, who cares? Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 23, 2010 - 9:29am |
|
winter wrote:Anyone else doing NaNoWriMo out there? I'm kinda far behind with mine. Hi, winter! I'm doing it again this year. I'm up to 38,343 words, but I'm hoping to get more done today. Last year, I got so disgusted with the story I was writing that I almost didn't finish. Of course, the point is quantity, not quality, so once I reminded myself of that, it got easier. I just let the blithering idiot in me take over the keyboard and have some fun. Keep at it - you'll get there!
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 23, 2010 - 7:39am |
|
RockRelic wrote:Hi everyone!..I'm brand new to Radio Paradise, so please excuse some possible errors! Plus of course, I'm an Ex-Pat Englishman living in France, which covers a multitude of sins! I've scanned through some of the comments and discussions and it seems to me that BAD English Grammar is a worldwide problem! I'm not implying that all my recently acquired fellow members are illiterate, but there does seem to be some agreement out there that using the written word has become slovenly and lazy...yes? Do we blame text messaging or the English teachers? For what it's worth, our son has just obtained his French degree as a Professor of English and is now teaching at a particulary 'difficult' college in Paris. His new, unadulterated view is that youngsters do not appreciate, or seem to need a correct language structure in their day to day lives. OK,..it should be his job to teach them the basics, but it seems a lonely, uphill slog! What are his chances, when daily, they are inundated with media language that bears little resemblance to the text book stuff! Any comments or responses?
Well, you probably do not like Jack Kerouac. That is fine, but I do and think the beauty or power of the description far outweighs the grammatical correctness of the writing. To me, in the context of entertainment writing for others; i.e. novels, short stories and so forth, grammar is almost irrelevant, the message and style of the message is what is important. However, in formal publications, columns and so forth, I agree, grammar should be correct. My 2. Edit: forums do not qualify as formal publications!
|
|
AliGator
|
Posted:
Nov 23, 2010 - 5:54am |
|
RockRelic wrote:Hi everyone!..I'm brand new to Radio Paradise, so please excuse some possible errors! Plus of course, I'm an Ex-Pat Englishman living in France, which covers a multitude of sins! I've scanned through some of the comments and discussions and it seems to me that BAD English Grammar is a worldwide problem! I'm not implying that all my recently acquired fellow members are illiterate, but there does seem to be some agreement out there that using the written word has become slovenly and lazy...yes? Do we blame text messaging or the English teachers? For what it's worth, our son has just obtained his French degree as a Professor of English and is now teaching at a particulary 'difficult' college in Paris. His new, unadulterated view is that youngsters do not appreciate, or seem to need a correct language structure in their day to day lives. OK,..it should be his job to teach them the basics, but it seems a lonely, uphill slog! What are his chances, when daily, they are inundated with media language that bears little resemblance to the text book stuff! Any comments or responses?
Lots of people seem to not care about spelling, grammar, and punctuation, and it also seems they have the attitude that "you know what I meant to say, so it doesn't matter." It grates on those of us who like precision in language. And I'm not a prescriptivist; I let some things slide. (The verbing of nouns? Let's get over it. Except for "gifting" — I haaaate that.) I don't think we can blame either text messaging or the teachers. Let's blame it on apathy. Congrats to your son on his CAPES, and best of luck to him.
|
|
Xeric
Location: Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 22, 2010 - 9:02pm |
|
winter wrote:Anyone else doing NaNoWriMo out there? I'm kinda far behind with mine.
And the be hinder you get, the more I see you HERE!
|
|
|