[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

NY Times Strands - Proclivities - Apr 18, 2025 - 6:08am
 
Breaking News - Red_Dragon - Apr 18, 2025 - 6:07am
 
NYTimes Connections - Proclivities - Apr 18, 2025 - 5:45am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Apr 18, 2025 - 5:30am
 
Wordle - daily game - Proclivities - Apr 18, 2025 - 5:12am
 
NASA & other news from space - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 18, 2025 - 12:36am
 
Trump - islander - Apr 17, 2025 - 9:36pm
 
Ask an Atheist - Lazy8 - Apr 17, 2025 - 9:12pm
 
Immigration - R_P - Apr 17, 2025 - 8:37pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Apr 17, 2025 - 8:22pm
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Apr 17, 2025 - 8:11pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2025 - 3:37pm
 
Cinema - R_P - Apr 17, 2025 - 2:53pm
 
Israel - R_P - Apr 17, 2025 - 2:24pm
 
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year - Proclivities - Apr 17, 2025 - 1:44pm
 
Sorry Bill/Alanna - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 17, 2025 - 12:59pm
 
The Obituary Page - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 17, 2025 - 12:50pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - Apr 17, 2025 - 12:01pm
 
Need A Thread Killed? - black321 - Apr 17, 2025 - 11:56am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Apr 17, 2025 - 11:51am
 
Freedom of speech? - R_P - Apr 17, 2025 - 11:17am
 
Things that are just WRONG - GeneP59 - Apr 17, 2025 - 11:08am
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - VV - Apr 17, 2025 - 10:49am
 
the Todd Rundgren topic - Steely_D - Apr 17, 2025 - 10:43am
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - Apr 17, 2025 - 10:35am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - GeneP59 - Apr 17, 2025 - 10:33am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - Steve - Apr 17, 2025 - 9:04am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2025 - 8:41am
 
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote') - black321 - Apr 17, 2025 - 8:07am
 
M.A.G.A. - Coaxial - Apr 17, 2025 - 5:52am
 
Little known information... maybe even facts - Coaxial - Apr 17, 2025 - 5:47am
 
Philly - Proclivities - Apr 17, 2025 - 4:47am
 
Flower Pictures - MrDill - Apr 17, 2025 - 4:43am
 
Economix - Lazy8 - Apr 16, 2025 - 8:48pm
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - Apr 16, 2025 - 8:46pm
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Apr 16, 2025 - 8:42pm
 
Canada - R_P - Apr 16, 2025 - 6:19pm
 
Other Medical Stuff - Isabeau - Apr 16, 2025 - 6:01pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - black321 - Apr 16, 2025 - 1:22pm
 
April 2025 Photo Theme - Red - Isabeau - Apr 16, 2025 - 12:17pm
 
Republican Party - R_P - Apr 16, 2025 - 10:49am
 
Music Videos - oldviolin - Apr 16, 2025 - 8:58am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Apr 16, 2025 - 8:48am
 
Skeptix - R_P - Apr 16, 2025 - 7:13am
 
Fascism In America - Red_Dragon - Apr 16, 2025 - 6:55am
 
NY Times Spelling Bee - Proclivities - Apr 16, 2025 - 6:53am
 
News of the Weird - GeneP59 - Apr 15, 2025 - 4:44pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Red_Dragon - Apr 15, 2025 - 4:03pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - skyguy - Apr 15, 2025 - 12:12pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - Isabeau - Apr 15, 2025 - 9:19am
 
Framed - movie guessing game - Steely_D - Apr 15, 2025 - 9:13am
 
Books - R_P - Apr 14, 2025 - 4:13pm
 
New Music - R_P - Apr 14, 2025 - 1:26pm
 
President(s) Musk/Trump - Proclivities - Apr 14, 2025 - 12:53pm
 
Quick! I need a chicken... - oldviolin - Apr 14, 2025 - 9:32am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Apr 14, 2025 - 5:46am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Apr 13, 2025 - 2:25pm
 
Apple Music app no longer showing song playing - audiophilepj - Apr 13, 2025 - 1:16pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Apr 13, 2025 - 10:35am
 
Spambags on RP - Proclivities - Apr 13, 2025 - 5:06am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - kcar - Apr 12, 2025 - 6:14pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - winter - Apr 12, 2025 - 5:22pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - DaveInSaoMiguel - Apr 12, 2025 - 12:56pm
 
PUNS - EUROPE - charlimoran917 - Apr 12, 2025 - 10:06am
 
Congress - miamizsun - Apr 12, 2025 - 8:03am
 
The Corporation - Red_Dragon - Apr 11, 2025 - 12:25pm
 
China - R_P - Apr 11, 2025 - 11:43am
 
• • • The Mandela Effect • • • - oldviolin - Apr 11, 2025 - 11:39am
 
Democratic Party - R_P - Apr 11, 2025 - 10:37am
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Apr 11, 2025 - 10:36am
 
Oh, GOD, they're LIBERAL!!!!! - Red_Dragon - Apr 11, 2025 - 9:42am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Apr 11, 2025 - 9:29am
 
RP and Cambridge Audio StreamMagic - Pwilli613 - Apr 11, 2025 - 7:18am
 
Classical stream option - kcar - Apr 10, 2025 - 3:57pm
 
Alexa bug: repeat on single "radio paradise " - dischuckin - Apr 10, 2025 - 12:47pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 42, 43, 44  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 23, 2024 - 8:04pm

"The Economist latest cover story on solar energy is packed with interesting stats."


Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2024 - 6:42am

The cement that could turn your house into a giant battery
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Gilead


Posted: May 24, 2024 - 6:55am

 islander wrote:


Germany has too many solar panels, and it's pushed energy prices into negative territory



https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/commodities/solar-panel-supply-german-electricity-prices-negative-renewable-demand-green-2024-5

Headline is a little misleading. The negative pricing was only during peak production. Germany fails to store most of the energy produced in that window. But this shows that there is plenty of capacity available.


Especially since Germany isn't a particularly sunny place.
islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: May 24, 2024 - 6:19am



Germany has too many solar panels, and it's pushed energy prices into negative territory



https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/commodities/solar-panel-supply-german-electricity-prices-negative-renewable-demand-green-2024-5

Headline is a little misleading. The negative pricing was only during peak production. Germany fails to store most of the energy produced in that window. But this shows that there is plenty of capacity available.
islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Wrong verb. Let people build them. Do away with zoning laws that prevent them from building solar roofs and they'll do it to save money. Stop trying to force the future and let the future happen.


We're also going to do away with arcane permitting rules that require people to have a grid connection too right?  There have been incentives and subsidies for all the traditional sources for decades to force their adoption. We now know (we knew then too) that there are substantial issues with those sources, but they were there supporting the right politicians, so the rules were made. 
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:59am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Wrong verb. Let people build them. Do away with zoning laws that prevent them from building solar roofs and they'll do it to save money. Stop trying to force the future and let the future happen.


Hmm, not having solar i wasnt aware there were zoning issues...though not surprised as trying to add even a 10x12 deck requires months of paperwork and thousands of $. 
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:58am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Wrong verb. Let people build them. Do away with zoning laws that prevent them from building solar roofs and they'll do it to save money. Stop trying to force the future and let the future happen.


now you're talking.
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:56am

 black321 wrote:
Well why not a decentralized hybrid approach?
Build more houses with solar/windmills?

Wrong verb. Let people build them. Do away with zoning laws that prevent them from building solar roofs and they'll do it to save money. Stop trying to force the future and let the future happen.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Gilead


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:52am

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:45am

 Lazy8 wrote:

No.

The big problem with renewables is the ratio of power generated to resources (land, material, labor, energy, capital) required to build them. You can think of this as cost, which greenies tend to think of as irrelevant, but it represents real resources. If the power generated doesn't justify the investment it's a net loss. A step backward. Coal burnt and labor spent that shouldn't have been.

Some projects make sense, some don't. The ones that make sense will happen because those building them can see a return; the ones that don't make sense get subsidized—propped up as a huge virtue signal measurable in tons of CO2, cubic miles of earth dug up, and years wasted.

Yes, there are technical problems, but they're solvable. The problem of humans deluding themselves that they're making progress by building windmills that spend most of their lives idle has proved a lot more intractable.


ok, when I have time, I'll look into the energy budget of windmills. I do know they are technically challenging and high maintenance. But I am still surprised at the sheer scale of wind energy output. I live here and it is not like the entire landscape is littered with the damn things, not more than any other major infrastructure.

I know you hate the distortion of government incentives (for good reason) but renewables are certainly not the only energy sector to have benefited from them. Nuclear, coal and oil & gas have too over the years. 

Anyways,  a cursory look at solar shows that a panel assuming an  average daily generation of 2kW will have produced more power than was needed to build it within the first 1000 hours of operation and will keep running pretty well maintenance free for years to come.   Sounds like a winning formula to me.

So it's not all chasing windmills or unicorns.
And the oil&gas lobby has been strangely quiet on the opportunity cost of their particular business for, how long now, um, maybe forever. It is not just climate change, but land use, air quality, radiation in the tailings, environmental impact, high fatality and accident rates, etc. 
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:39am

Well why not a decentralized hybrid approach?
Build more houses with solar/windmills? 
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:31am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
The big problem with renewables is securing the base load. This is why gas-fired plants are still so important, as you can fire them up at short notice to meet peak demand. 
the only renewable source with that kind of flexibility is hydro and pumped storage, but there is nowhere enough of it to meet the baseload.

No.

The big problem with renewables is the ratio of power generated to resources (land, material, labor, energy, capital) required to build them. You can think of this as cost, which greenies tend to think of as irrelevant, but it represents real resources. If the power generated doesn't justify the investment it's a net loss. A step backward. Coal burnt and labor spent that shouldn't have been.

Some projects make sense, some don't. The ones that make sense will happen because those building them can see a return; the ones that don't make sense get subsidized—propped up as a huge virtue signal measurable in tons of CO2, cubic miles of earth dug up, and years wasted.

Yes, there are technical problems, but they're solvable. The problem of humans deluding themselves that they're making progress by building windmills that spend most of their lives idle has proved a lot more intractable.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 9:16pm

 haresfur wrote:


One of my big frustrations with energy policy in Australia is the lack of support for gas generation to support peak demand. The environmentalists take a "build it and they will come" attitude to renewables and think that the problem of peak demand will somehow be solved if non-renewable options are off the table. Meanwhile labor and liberals tacitly support continued coal generation because the union jobs are joined at the hip to big business mining. The opportunities for pumped hydro storage are limited by the lack of suitable rivers. Locally, there was an initial assessment that showed the promise for pumped hydro using the maze of mine shafts beneath the town, going down well over a kilometer in depth (no evaporation loss). The catch is that the next study needed would be a quite expensive demonstration that they could keep the upper zone in one mine trend isolated from the deep zone in another and no one wants to spend that. So they will turn off the pumps and flood the deep zone to the point where it will be impossible to reverse.

So that leaves battery storage, which has had some success in South Australia but will be hard to scale up to the level needed. And there is a growing opposition to the impacts of lithium mining. Don't get me started on the limitations put on wind generation by nimbys on the right and left. 


tbh, 20 years ago as the whole wind thing was starting to stoke investor interest here (because of tax breaks) I was thinking, yeah, good to have, but, you know, unicorns. 

I am actually surprised  that so much of Germany's power now comes from renewables. Never thought it would happen at that scale or so quickly. 
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 4:18pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

of course, but that is the great virtue of a continent-wide grid: for instance, excess wind power from Germany and the Netherlands on windy days is used to pump water into hydrostorage in, say, Norway, (and because Norway can buy it cheaply due to oversupply on such days), then when spot prices rise, Norway can ramp up their hydropower plants to generate power that it can then sell at a premium.  It's actually a win-win situation.
In fact there is a lot more granularity than that, as providers can respond almost immediately to spot prices. Our residential development has a small gas-fired co-gen plant that only fires up during peak demand. We get the waste heat to warm our houses and hot water. Again, a win-win. 

The big problem with renewables is securing the base load. This is why gas-fired plants are still so important, as you can fire them up at short notice to meet peak demand. 
the only renewable source with that kind of flexibility is hydro and pumped storage, but there is nowhere enough of it to meet the baseload. 



One of my big frustrations with energy policy in Australia is the lack of support for gas generation to support peak demand. The environmentalists take a "build it and they will come" attitude to renewables and think that the problem of peak demand will somehow be solved if non-renewable options are off the table. Meanwhile labor and liberals tacitly support continued coal generation because the union jobs are joined at the hip to big business mining. The opportunities for pumped hydro storage are limited by the lack of suitable rivers. Locally, there was an initial assessment that showed the promise for pumped hydro using the maze of mine shafts beneath the town, going down well over a kilometer in depth (no evaporation loss). The catch is that the next study needed would be a quite expensive demonstration that they could keep the upper zone in one mine trend isolated from the deep zone in another and no one wants to spend that. So they will turn off the pumps and flood the deep zone to the point where it will be impossible to reverse.

So that leaves battery storage, which has had some success in South Australia but will be hard to scale up to the level needed. And there is a growing opposition to the impacts of lithium mining. Don't get me started on the limitations put on wind generation by nimbys on the right and left. 
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 3:15pm

 Lazy8 wrote:

Net imports. There are a lot more days when Germany imports power than exports, and on those days it's a lot more than 2%.


of course, but that is the great virtue of a continent-wide grid: for instance, excess wind power from Germany and the Netherlands on windy days is used to pump water into hydrostorage in, say, Norway, (and because Norway can buy it cheaply due to oversupply on such days), then when spot prices rise, Norway can ramp up their hydropower plants to generate power that it can then sell at a premium.  It's actually a win-win situation.
In fact there is a lot more granularity than that, as providers can respond almost immediately to spot prices. Our residential development has a small gas-fired co-gen plant that only fires up during peak demand. We get the waste heat to warm our houses and hot water. Again, a win-win. 

The big problem with renewables is securing the base load. This is why gas-fired plants are still so important, as you can fire them up at short notice to meet peak demand. 
the only renewable source with that kind of flexibility is hydro and pumped storage, but there is nowhere enough of it to meet the baseload. 

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 2:24pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
oh I agree with the stupidity of shutting down perfectly good nuclear stations that had already 1) amortised themselves and 2) were good to go for a few years yet and 3) were pretty much carbon neutral.    but see page 6 of this for more on Germany's net electricity imports/exports. IIRC we were exporting lots of electricity to France in 2021 in the middle of their drought as they had no cooling water.

Here's a nice breakdown for you. imports only accounted for about 2% in 2023.

Net imports. There are a lot more days when Germany imports power than exports, and on those days it's a lot more than 2%.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 11:08am

 Lazy8 wrote:

See the demand load, mostly in excess of native production? That's imported power, mostly nuclear from France. That could have been done in-country but for colossally stupid decisions driven by superstition.
oh I agree with the stupidity of shutting down perfectly good nuclear stations that had already 1) amortised themselves and 2) were good to go for a few years yet and 3) were pretty much carbon neutral.    but see page 6 of this for more on Germany's net electricity imports/exports. IIRC we were exporting lots of electricity to France in 2021 in the middle of their drought as they had no cooling water.

Here's a nice breakdown for you. imports only accounted for about 2% in 2023.

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 8:54am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
The German energy charts are fascinating.  

Renewables are really making a massive impact with the share of coal constantly declining. And this was a week at the end of winter/beginning of spring. 
The cloudy days of no wind are still the issue (see March 20) But otherwise,  renewables are performing brilliantly. Now all we need is more pumped storage to cover those gaps.

See the demand load, mostly in excess of native production? That's imported power, mostly nuclear from France. That could have been done in-country but for colossally stupid decisions driven by superstition.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 1:32am

The German energy charts are fascinating.  

Renewables are really making a massive impact with the share of coal constantly declining. And this was a week at the end of winter/beginning of spring. 
The cloudy days of no wind are still the issue (see March 20) But otherwise,  renewables are performing brilliantly. Now all we need is more pumped storage to cover those gaps.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2024 - 12:08pm

 islander wrote:


Germany has some interesting power things going. They were very creative and went after some novel ideas. Most of them have been pretty successful. The idea of a widely distributed production grid is a really solid idea if you have the back end to manage it (and they do). 

We see some pretty scary DIY too, but I'm generally impressed by most peoples enthusiasm for the ideas. I do wish there were less 'kookery' and conspiratorial thinking in the space, but
it is what it is.  I also wish the DIY crews weren't heavily overlapped with the generally the anti-establishment/anti-elite education set. It makes it really hard to get people to sit down and do the initial math, and understand what is underlying the systems they are putting together (Why am I not getting 100 Watts of power when I put a 100W light bulb over my solar panel?). 

20K is about right for a moderately sized household (depends on how big those 23 panels are and what fun widgets they put on the system). For that to be a 20 year payoff would mean his electric bills would be under a $100 a month.  And within 20 years, he will probably need a battery replacement.  


That's interesting, thanks. And kind of confirms what I was suspecting. 
In terms of ROI it is kind of hard to beat these DIY "balcony power plant" solutions. Maybe four panels instead of two (which would equal 8KW on a good day) . That would probably cover all the low-end appliances and have a bit left over for the high-end devices (oven, washing machine, etc.) provided, of course you wash/bake bread when the sun shines. For 4k upfront investment, it's worth a try. 

I helped him bolt it onto his house and was seriously impressed that you just needed to plug this thing into a normal socket and not worry about anything else. Like, is that it? srsly?

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 42, 43, 44  Next