[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Country Up The Bumpkin - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 31, 2024 - 8:54pm
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 31, 2024 - 8:48pm
 
New Music - R_P - Aug 31, 2024 - 8:09pm
 
Israel - R_P - Aug 31, 2024 - 7:33pm
 
Can't Stream RP - jarro - Aug 31, 2024 - 7:25pm
 
Trump - Manbird - Aug 31, 2024 - 7:04pm
 
*ATTENTION*: Security Warning - Manbird - Aug 31, 2024 - 6:55pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Beaker - Aug 31, 2024 - 6:38pm
 
NYTimes Connections - Bill_J - Aug 31, 2024 - 6:11pm
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Aug 31, 2024 - 6:06pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - oldviolin - Aug 31, 2024 - 6:05pm
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Aug 31, 2024 - 5:58pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Aug 31, 2024 - 5:56pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - oldviolin - Aug 31, 2024 - 5:54pm
 
Jam! (why should a song stop) - oldviolin - Aug 31, 2024 - 5:42pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Aug 31, 2024 - 5:30pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 31, 2024 - 4:43pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Baha_48 - Aug 31, 2024 - 4:25pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - kurtster - Aug 31, 2024 - 4:01pm
 
NY Times Strands - maryte - Aug 31, 2024 - 3:42pm
 
Is it wrong to not want to listen to music I don't unders... - kurtster - Aug 31, 2024 - 3:13pm
 
Wordle - daily game - maryte - Aug 31, 2024 - 3:00pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Aug 31, 2024 - 2:39pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - Lazy8 - Aug 31, 2024 - 2:34pm
 
Today in History - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 31, 2024 - 9:58am
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Aug 31, 2024 - 9:02am
 
Outstanding Covers - miamizsun - Aug 31, 2024 - 7:25am
 
Other Medical Stuff - miamizsun - Aug 31, 2024 - 7:16am
 
Immigration - sirdroseph - Aug 31, 2024 - 4:48am
 
LeftWingNutZ - sirdroseph - Aug 31, 2024 - 4:44am
 
Stills - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 30, 2024 - 4:06pm
 
August 2024 Photo Theme - Transportation - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 30, 2024 - 4:03pm
 
The Obituary Page - rgio - Aug 30, 2024 - 2:46pm
 
OUR CATS!! - Beaker - Aug 30, 2024 - 2:32pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Aug 30, 2024 - 12:50pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Proclivities - Aug 30, 2024 - 12:08pm
 
China - R_P - Aug 30, 2024 - 11:21am
 
Kamala Harris - islander - Aug 30, 2024 - 10:21am
 
Creepy - Proclivities - Aug 30, 2024 - 10:06am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Aug 30, 2024 - 8:17am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - haresfur - Aug 29, 2024 - 9:24pm
 
Favorite Quotes - oldviolin - Aug 29, 2024 - 7:46pm
 
TEXAS - Red_Dragon - Aug 29, 2024 - 6:36pm
 
The RANT Forum - haresfur - Aug 29, 2024 - 5:03pm
 
Graphic Designers Must Go! - Beaker - Aug 29, 2024 - 3:01pm
 
What did you have for lunch? - miamizsun - Aug 29, 2024 - 11:51am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - amsinc_mail - Aug 29, 2024 - 7:05am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Aug 29, 2024 - 6:17am
 
Russia - sirdroseph - Aug 28, 2024 - 5:00pm
 
Electronic Music - thisbody - Aug 28, 2024 - 2:37pm
 
BACK TO THE 80's - thisbody - Aug 28, 2024 - 2:16pm
 
Britain - Red_Dragon - Aug 28, 2024 - 12:32pm
 
Democratic Party - sirdroseph - Aug 28, 2024 - 5:16am
 
Free and Fair Elections! - Red_Dragon - Aug 27, 2024 - 7:33pm
 
Whataboutism! - oldviolin - Aug 27, 2024 - 6:37pm
 
RightWingNutZ - Steely_D - Aug 27, 2024 - 5:07pm
 
Facebook Group for RP - buddy - Aug 27, 2024 - 3:22pm
 
Canada - Beaker - Aug 27, 2024 - 3:13pm
 
Poetry Forum - buddy - Aug 27, 2024 - 2:52pm
 
What Did You See Today? - haresfur - Aug 27, 2024 - 2:28pm
 
Beers are Dying - black321 - Aug 27, 2024 - 12:54pm
 
France - R_P - Aug 27, 2024 - 12:38pm
 
NASA & other news from space - GeneP59 - Aug 27, 2024 - 9:06am
 
Roon support - rjborley - Aug 27, 2024 - 7:03am
 
Synchronization - david21 - Aug 26, 2024 - 4:10pm
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - dischuckin - Aug 26, 2024 - 11:00am
 
Tim Walz - Beaker - Aug 26, 2024 - 10:05am
 
What did you have for dinner? - Antigone - Aug 25, 2024 - 1:29pm
 
Hello from Germany - thisbody - Aug 25, 2024 - 1:24pm
 
Agents of TRUTH - thisbody - Aug 25, 2024 - 1:17pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - Red_Dragon - Aug 25, 2024 - 8:53am
 
Cambodians singers are doing well ! - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 24, 2024 - 9:37pm
 
Tripping - kurtster - Aug 23, 2024 - 11:15pm
 
Song Title not updating on m3u Stream on Mac OS - iMac - dryan67 - Aug 23, 2024 - 12:14pm
 
Rhetorical questions - oldviolin - Aug 23, 2024 - 9:08am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Climate Change Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 15, 16, 17  Next
Post to this Topic
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 3:14pm

 buzz wrote:

uh...yeah...thats pretty much it...i guess
 
This was about a week ago. I'm not backscrolling to get it all straight. 
 
You said something about science finding solutions to all our problems and making life good. something kinda like that sorta maybe more or less. Monsanto was the first thing that came to mind when I read that. I said it out loud. Don't over think it. It's me.
 
Jonas Salk saw a problem. He found the money and he solved it. The world needs more Jonas Salks. My distrust of the Climate Change industry started with Al Gore. Too many people making money without solving the problems. I am a little skeptical of climate change scientist because in order to stay in business and continue to get funding, they must continue to scream that the sky is falling. Whether it is or is not. 
 
I'm old and tired. Let it drop. 

 
90% of all scientists believe in climate change. You mean to say they are all bought off?

Salk received funding from what was to become the March of Dimes which was started by FDR. He didn't do it himself. He didn't find the money, the money found him. He took a research position at Pitt's School of Medicine after being turned down from other schools because he was Jewish.


buzz

buzz Avatar

Location: up the boohai


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 3:05pm

 steeler wrote:


Let's try again.

You throw out Monsanto. And I respond — admittedly, off the top of my head — with Jonas Salk. I did so because he is an example of a scientist whose work contributed significantly to better the human experience and he did so without seeking personal profit.  It would be relevant if your point — and I'm guessing as to what your point might be — were that scientists studying global warming are concocting findings for personal profit.

Now, I'm guessing that the point behind your post above might be that scientific research  funded through private sources is less suspect or more trustworthy than scientific research funded or subsidized in whole or in part by governmental sources?    

   

 
uh...yeah...thats pretty much it...i guess
 
This was about a week ago. I'm not backscrolling to get it all straight. 
 
You said something about science finding solutions to all our problems and making life good. something kinda like that sorta maybe more or less. Monsanto was the first thing that came to mind when I read that. I said it out loud. Don't over think it. It's me.
 
Jonas Salk saw a problem. He found the money and he solved it. The world needs more Jonas Salks. My distrust of the Climate Change industry started with Al Gore. Too many people making money without solving the problems. I am a little skeptical of climate change scientist because in order to stay in business and continue to get funding, they must continue to scream that the sky is falling. Whether it is or is not. 
 
I'm old and tired. Let it drop. 
ScottN

ScottN Avatar

Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 2:21pm

 hippiechick wrote:

Greenland is Melting, Literally

This is some scary stuff. According to NASA analysis of recent satellite readings, in just four days, nearly all of Greenland’s surface ice melted.

 

.........

Because if we don't act soon, Greenland will just be the beginning.



  Umh, HC, the impression you are making is simply untrue.  What is true is that it is melting at a record pace.  But it is almost two miles thick in some places.  The sea level would rise drastically, ocean currents altered, and the sea awash in icebergs.


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 1:50pm

 steeler wrote:
Let's try again.

You throw out Monsanto. And I respond — admittedly, off the top of my head — with Jonas Salk. I did so because he is an example of a scientist whose work contributed significantly to better the human experience and he did so without seeking personal profit.  It would be relevant if your point — and I'm guessing as to what your point might be — were that scientists studying global warming are concocting findings for personal profit.

Now, I'm guessing that the point behind your post above might be that scientific research  funded through private sources is less suspect or more trustworthy than scientific research funded or subsidized in whole or in part by governmental sources?   
 
i haven't back-scrolled so don't blame me

monsanto (a global lobbying powerhouse) and government(s) are special partners

they (monsanto) have the best state secured privileges money can buy

i guess my point would be is there any difference between the two (especially their trustworthiness)

in other words, both are corrupt and in bed together

can we trust them

i think there could be an influenced interpretation of what some scientist in the trenches says and what his superiors might say

whistle blowers don't do very well in corrupt political or corporate environs

regards



steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 12:21pm

 buzz wrote:

HITLER!
 

ok...not really, but i had to go with the first thing that popped into my head. you know how that is.
 

 

A quick looks show that Salk was privately funded by what would later become The March of Dimes. 


 

Let's try again.

You throw out Monsanto. And I respond — admittedly, off the top of my head — with Jonas Salk. I did so because he is an example of a scientist whose work contributed significantly to better the human experience and he did so without seeking personal profit.  It would be relevant if your point — and I'm guessing as to what your point might be — were that scientists studying global warming are concocting findings for personal profit.

Now, I'm guessing that the point behind your post above might be that scientific research  funded through private sources is less suspect or more trustworthy than scientific research funded or subsidized in whole or in part by governmental sources?    

   


Umberdog

Umberdog Avatar

Location: In my body.
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 12:07pm

 hippiechick wrote:

Greenland is Melting, Literally

This is some scary stuff. According to NASA analysis of recent satellite readings, in just four days, nearly all of Greenland’s surface ice melted.

In a normal summer, 40 percent of Greenland’s landmass is covered by ice as the ice sheet shrinks by about half during the hottest months of the year. And on July 8th, things were still looking normal. 

But just four days later, 97 percent of Greenland’s icy blanket was thawing out, a record amount of melting in a record amount of time. 

“The discovery was so severe, researchers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California analyzing the satellite data thought it was a mistake. The space agency has monitored Greenland’s annual ice melt for 30 years, and has never recorded anything like this before.” 

As the U.S. suffered through a triple-digit heat wave, on July 11 and 12, Greenland was experiencing it’s own heat wave, with temperatures reaching a degree or two above freezing — which in the arctic, is utterly catastrophic. 

Not since 1889 has Greenland experienced such a melting event. Whether Global Warming caused the rapid melt or this is a natural event is still up for debate. Lets hope for the sake of Greenland and our entire planet, that this was an isolated event. 

Despite the mounting evidence of global warming, including Greenland melting in just four days — many of our elected leaders still refuse to admit that global warming is real, let alone do anything about it. Click here to sign our petiton demanding elected officials take this issue seriously.

Because if we don't act soon, Greenland will just be the beginning.



 
The wrong right is already shrugging loudly. Even with 3/4's of the US in drought and farmers dropping like flies. It's amazing how blind a political agenda and blatant stupidity can make some "thinking" apes.
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 12:05pm

 miamizsun wrote:

bump

 
We'll see...
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 11:56am

 miamizsun wrote: 
bump
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Aug 8, 2012 - 11:39am

Greenland is Melting, Literally

This is some scary stuff. According to NASA analysis of recent satellite readings, in just four days, nearly all of Greenland’s surface ice melted.

In a normal summer, 40 percent of Greenland’s landmass is covered by ice as the ice sheet shrinks by about half during the hottest months of the year. And on July 8th, things were still looking normal. 

But just four days later, 97 percent of Greenland’s icy blanket was thawing out, a record amount of melting in a record amount of time. 

“The discovery was so severe, researchers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California analyzing the satellite data thought it was a mistake. The space agency has monitored Greenland’s annual ice melt for 30 years, and has never recorded anything like this before.” 

As the U.S. suffered through a triple-digit heat wave, on July 11 and 12, Greenland was experiencing it’s own heat wave, with temperatures reaching a degree or two above freezing — which in the arctic, is utterly catastrophic. 

Not since 1889 has Greenland experienced such a melting event. Whether Global Warming caused the rapid melt or this is a natural event is still up for debate. Lets hope for the sake of Greenland and our entire planet, that this was an isolated event. 

Despite the mounting evidence of global warming, including Greenland melting in just four days — many of our elected leaders still refuse to admit that global warming is real, let alone do anything about it. Click here to sign our petiton demanding elected officials take this issue seriously.

Because if we don't act soon, Greenland will just be the beginning.


helenofjoy

helenofjoy Avatar

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Gender: Female


Posted: Aug 5, 2012 - 11:08am

 Umberdog wrote:

Better than paying their fair share in taxes?

 
Winning "a game."
Umberdog

Umberdog Avatar

Location: In my body.
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 4, 2012 - 9:59pm

 Xeric wrote:
Yeah, because if that was accomplished, then, uh, well, then, uhmm . . . well, really, why the fuck would anybody be motivated to do that?
 
Better than paying their fair share in taxes?
Xeric

Xeric Avatar

Location: Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 4, 2012 - 8:02pm

 Umberdog wrote:
This is the BIG problem: The make believe and denial of the brain-washed, ditto-headed, greedy, multitude. Our weakest link.

 "The whole global warming thing is created to destroy America's free enterprise system and our economic stability." ~ Jerry Falwell

 



 
Yeah, because if that was accomplished, then, uh, well, then, uhmm . . . well, really, why the fuck would anybody be motivated to do that?
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Aug 4, 2012 - 3:07pm

 buzz wrote:

HITLER!
 

ok...not really, but i had to go with the first thing that popped into my head. you know how that is.
 

 

A quick looks show that Salk was privately funded by what would later become The March of Dimes. 


 



You might just state your point. Perhaps I might then be able to understand it. No promises, though, as I am a simple man.
Umberdog

Umberdog Avatar

Location: In my body.
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 4, 2012 - 12:03pm

This is the BIG problem: The make believe and denial of the brain-washed, ditto-headed, greedy, multitude. Our weakest link.

 "The whole global warming thing is created to destroy America's free enterprise system and our economic stability." ~ Jerry Falwell

 




buzz

buzz Avatar

Location: up the boohai


Posted: Aug 4, 2012 - 11:56am

 steeler wrote:


Jonas Salk

 
HITLER!
 

ok...not really, but i had to go with the first thing that popped into my head. you know how that is.
 

 

A quick looks show that Salk was privately funded by what would later become The March of Dimes. 

steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Aug 4, 2012 - 11:01am

 buzz wrote:

Monsanto
 
 
 
just sayin...

 



Jonas Salk
jadewahoo

jadewahoo Avatar

Location: Puerto Viejo, Costa Rica
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2012 - 7:25pm

Given the procedures and options being offered by the techno-industrial civilization that has created this imbalance, there is no hope, there is no solution.
Umberdog

Umberdog Avatar

Location: In my body.
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2012 - 7:21pm

Nature functions across millions of years. Humanity will be just a blink of her eye.
ScottN

ScottN Avatar

Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2012 - 7:13pm

 black321 wrote:

I dont see global warming as a problem for mother nature, so much as a potential disaster for the human race.  Regardless, we need to be investing in better technologies to get us away from polluting toxins and using up all our natural resources.

edit, and if we properly "invest" we could solve some of our economic issues to boot!
 
Of course. "Mother Nature " is the agency for change, not the victim, "we" are..  I think we caused it (planetary crisis) and a disaster of epic proportions is imminent as measured in a few decades, not centuries.  If we stopped all pollution today (unrealistic to an inconceivable degree), the atmosphere is still overloaded.  We have passed the tipping point.  The economic advantages, whatever they may be, will be for the survivors.  "Mother Nature", our Planet will certainly make a correcting mechanism to regain the equilibrium. I doubt we will like the method very much..  I am pessimistic that technology of any type can reverse, or even much mitigate, this outcome.  I guess this is one benefit of being older....I may not be around to suffer through it.


black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2012 - 2:04pm

 ScottN wrote:

My personal belief is we passed the tipping point before the subject was even much in dialogue.  The planet, as we live today, simply cannot sustainably support 7-8 billion peeps.  To me, it's a no brainer to think that dumping trillions of tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere annually over a couple of centuries won't have significant consequences.  Add to that all the other insults to which we have subjected our only planet and you have an inevitable future disaster.

 
I dont see global warming as a problem for mother nature, so much as a potential disaster for the human race.  Regardless, we need to be investing in better technologies to get us away from polluting toxins and using up all our natural resources.

edit, and if we properly "invest" we could solve some of our economic issues to boot!


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 15, 16, 17  Next