[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

TWO WORDS - oldviolin - Dec 2, 2024 - 9:24pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - GeneP59 - Dec 2, 2024 - 9:01pm
 
Republican Party - kurtster - Dec 2, 2024 - 8:09pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Dec 2, 2024 - 7:35pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Dec 2, 2024 - 6:11pm
 
What makes you smile? - Antigone - Dec 2, 2024 - 3:39pm
 
Internet Hoaxes - miamizsun - Dec 2, 2024 - 3:25pm
 
Dear buzz - miamizsun - Dec 2, 2024 - 3:20pm
 
ONE WORD - oldviolin - Dec 2, 2024 - 3:19pm
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Dec 2, 2024 - 2:39pm
 
Name My Band - Isabeau - Dec 2, 2024 - 2:33pm
 
Dance with me - Isabeau - Dec 2, 2024 - 2:29pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Isabeau - Dec 2, 2024 - 1:51pm
 
Trump - R_P - Dec 2, 2024 - 1:28pm
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Dec 2, 2024 - 1:10pm
 
Living in America - Red_Dragon - Dec 2, 2024 - 12:07pm
 
December 2024 Photo Theme - Lighting - Alchemist - Dec 2, 2024 - 12:05pm
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Dec 2, 2024 - 11:55am
 
NY Times Strands - geoff_morphini - Dec 2, 2024 - 11:25am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Dec 2, 2024 - 11:18am
 
Wordle - daily game - geoff_morphini - Dec 2, 2024 - 11:14am
 
Economix - black321 - Dec 2, 2024 - 9:03am
 
NYTimes Connections - islander - Dec 2, 2024 - 8:48am
 
RightWingNutZ - Steely_D - Dec 2, 2024 - 8:46am
 
Radio Paradise for Android Automotive - foof2010 - Dec 2, 2024 - 7:15am
 
Ways to Listen to RP on WiiM Plus - pegasusbay - Dec 1, 2024 - 4:08pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Dec 1, 2024 - 3:47pm
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - Dec 1, 2024 - 10:28am
 
♥ ♥ ♥ Vote For Pie ♥ ♥ ♥ - miamizsun - Dec 1, 2024 - 9:47am
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - kurtster - Dec 1, 2024 - 5:23am
 
Pictures you have taken of your feet. *snort* - Isabeau - Dec 1, 2024 - 4:12am
 
November 2024 Photo Theme - Monochrome - Isabeau - Dec 1, 2024 - 4:03am
 
Israel - R_P - Nov 30, 2024 - 8:27pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Nov 30, 2024 - 5:43pm
 
Music Remixes? - buddy - Nov 30, 2024 - 5:39pm
 
Outstanding Covers - Steely_D - Nov 30, 2024 - 4:23pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - Nov 30, 2024 - 3:04pm
 
Favorite Quotes - Manbird - Nov 30, 2024 - 2:28pm
 
Happy Thanksgiving! - Manbird - Nov 30, 2024 - 2:08pm
 
MQA Stream Coming to BLUOS - ayang90 - Nov 30, 2024 - 11:36am
 
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today... - oldviolin - Nov 30, 2024 - 9:37am
 
The Obituary Page - GeneP59 - Nov 30, 2024 - 8:52am
 
New Music - R_P - Nov 29, 2024 - 10:18pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - Manbird - Nov 29, 2024 - 7:21pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - William - Nov 29, 2024 - 2:19pm
 
Sailing By - Isabeau - Nov 29, 2024 - 2:09pm
 
-PUNS- FRUIT - oldviolin - Nov 29, 2024 - 9:30am
 
Things You Thought Today - Isabeau - Nov 29, 2024 - 7:09am
 
How's the weather? - GeneP59 - Nov 28, 2024 - 6:09pm
 
George Carlin - R_P - Nov 28, 2024 - 12:47pm
 
Roon support - ayang90 - Nov 28, 2024 - 8:44am
 
BEAT - Adrien Belew, Tony Levin, Danny Carey, Steve Vai - Steely_D - Nov 28, 2024 - 8:25am
 
Climate Change - R_P - Nov 27, 2024 - 10:40pm
 
The Grateful Dead - buddy - Nov 27, 2024 - 3:56pm
 
Photography Chat - kurtster - Nov 27, 2024 - 3:29pm
 
Children and the Future - black321 - Nov 27, 2024 - 10:05am
 
Musky Mythology - ScottFromWyoming - Nov 27, 2024 - 9:29am
 
Classic TV Curiosities - ScottFromWyoming - Nov 27, 2024 - 9:22am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - Isabeau - Nov 27, 2024 - 9:01am
 
Can you afford to retire? - islander - Nov 27, 2024 - 8:33am
 
My Mix - Isabeau - Nov 27, 2024 - 8:28am
 
Cosmic Traffic Report. - Isabeau - Nov 27, 2024 - 8:13am
 
Advice? - haresfur - Nov 25, 2024 - 4:12pm
 
MIXES - R_P - Nov 24, 2024 - 5:36pm
 
More music by women - buddy - Nov 24, 2024 - 4:45pm
 
Republican Lies, Deceit and Hypocrisy - Red_Dragon - Nov 24, 2024 - 9:56am
 
You really put butter on the hot dog? - oldviolin - Nov 24, 2024 - 9:31am
 
My Favorites - buddy - Nov 23, 2024 - 4:22pm
 
Environment - Red_Dragon - Nov 23, 2024 - 3:50pm
 
Movie Recommendation - Steely_D - Nov 23, 2024 - 12:43pm
 
TV shows you watch - miamizsun - Nov 23, 2024 - 12:19pm
 
Other Medical Stuff - oldviolin - Nov 22, 2024 - 5:15pm
 
Graphs, Charts & Maps - Proclivities - Nov 22, 2024 - 1:36pm
 
Most under rated albums ? - ScottFromWyoming - Nov 21, 2024 - 9:44am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Steely_D - Nov 21, 2024 - 7:35am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Nuclear power - saviour or scourge? Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 25, 26, 27  Next
Post to this Topic
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 5, 2024 - 2:05pm

 Proclivities wrote:

He was clumsily trying to equate the development of nuclear technology - bombs in particular - with what he perceives as the "secularism" of the United States.  He's saying that WWII changed everything (well, of course it did - for one thing, about 80 million people died), and that secularism arose after 1945, as a result of the war.  The decline in US church attendance didn't really happen until much later, and it certainly had nothing to do with nuclear technology.


ironically the immaculate conception cathedral at nagasaki
kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: Nov 4, 2024 - 2:06pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:


He's talking about weapons. All the "nobody knows" stuff is nonsense but he's right: they're demonic. Evil. Then he goes back into his religionuttery but if that message is delivered, that nukes (weapons) are evil incarnate, I'm okay with that. If using them is portrayed as a crime against Christianity, then great. 



"Nobody knows"?!!?!? JFC that clown is seriously uneducated. Apparently he's never heard of the Manhattan Project or Christopher Nolan's movie "Oppenheimer." The two bombs dropped on Japan were awful and destructive but they were the product of a small town of dedicated, brilliant people. 

We could argue all day about whether it was militarily necessary to drop the bombs, esp. on largely civilian populations. IIRC the US Army and government believed that fighting Japan to defeat with only non-nuclear weapons would lead to a death toll in the millions. It's my understanding that they dramatically under-estimated the number of deaths and casualties from the resulting nuclear fallout. 

I don't have much interest in studying nuclear weapons. At best AFAICT they act as a deterrent and contain warfare within certain "rules" or accepted conventions of military action. 

If we're going to re-commit to nuclear power plants, my guess is that we'll have to take a long, hard look at how the Chinese build their plants and get them online. I haven't checked out what's going with GA's Vogtle plants but those were massively over-budget and late. 
Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 4, 2024 - 1:52pm

 miamizsun wrote:


yeah, i think he may be speaking to their use on innocent civilians
the diaries of japanese survivors was pretty horrific
nuclear power? done correctly is a good thing



He was clumsily trying to equate the development of nuclear technology - bombs in particular - with what he perceives as the "secularism" of the United States.  He's saying that WWII changed everything (well, of course it did - for one thing, about 80 million people died), and that secularism arose after 1945, as a result of the war.  The decline in US church attendance didn't really happen until much later, and it certainly had nothing to do with nuclear technology.
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 4, 2024 - 1:52pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
He's talking about weapons. All the "nobody knows" stuff is nonsense but he's right: they're demonic. Evil. Then he goes back into his religionuttery but if that message is delivered, that nukes (weapons) are evil incarnate, I'm okay with that. If using them is portrayed as a crime against Christianity, then great.

The context is nuclear weapons, but he segues into the "unknown origin of nuclear technology." His argument about being used on Xians is bogus too. Xians are and always have been a tiny minority in Japan. Also tiny, in comparison, are the US POWs killed in the Nagasaki explosion.

BTW, firebombing Japanese cities wasn't any less "demonic."
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 4, 2024 - 1:35pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:


He's talking about weapons. All the "nobody knows" stuff is nonsense but he's right: they're demonic. Evil. Then he goes back into his religionuttery but if that message is delivered, that nukes (weapons) are evil incarnate, I'm okay with that. If using them is portrayed as a crime against Christianity, then great. 



yeah, i think he may be speaking to their use on innocent civilians
the diaries of japanese survivors was pretty horrific
nuclear power? done correctly is a good thing


ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 4, 2024 - 1:21pm

 R_P wrote:

Shades of “Tide goes in, tide goes out. Never a miscommunication. You can’t explain that. You can’t explain why the tide goes in.”




He's talking about weapons. All the "nobody knows" stuff is nonsense but he's right: they're demonic. Evil. Then he goes back into his religionuttery but if that message is delivered, that nukes (weapons) are evil incarnate, I'm okay with that. If using them is portrayed as a crime against Christianity, then great. 

Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 4, 2024 - 1:02pm

 R_P wrote:

Shades of “Tide goes in, tide goes out. Never a miscommunication. You can’t explain that. You can’t explain why the tide goes in.”


I guess he's never met a person who knows anything about science or history.
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 4, 2024 - 12:43pm

Shades of “Tide goes in, tide goes out. Never a miscommunication. You can’t explain that. You can’t explain why the tide goes in.”

haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 16, 2024 - 10:24pm

 miamizsun wrote:


i think he wrote a bestseller about avoiding climate disaster
a how to i suppose
i think he is concerned
is he going about it in a way that we all approve?
i doubt it/unlikely
overall i think he is a force for good

I think he genuinely wants to be a force for good, unlike many other uber rich. I think there is a fundamental disconnect between developing technology that requires a huge increase in energy use, requiring dedication of significant amounts of nuclear power so that he is resurrecting a power plant with a lot of bad press rather than putting the nuclear energy towards reducing fossil fuel use. 

People were writing about the limits to growth back when I was an undergrad. Global warming is one aspect of that issue but not the only one.

islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 16, 2024 - 3:48pm

 miamizsun wrote:


ai? that genie is not going back into the bottle
will it help with nuclear power?
my magic 8 ball says yes


yes to that, but do we believe that MS/Google/Meta/X can be trusted to self regulate the production of energy from a nuclear reactor?  Magic 8 ball says 

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 16, 2024 - 3:40pm

 islander wrote:


Yeah, nuclear power is an answer to our power budget problem. But AI and bitcoin are heroin and crack to our power dependency issues.  

We are making great strides on conservation and alternative generation, and still nuclear is the only realistic option. Then you add AI compute to the mix... it's not going to end well.  Also, I don't trust most (any?) of these groups to self regulate their AI, I really don't trust them to run a nuclear power plant to sustain them.



ai? that genie is not going back into the bottle
will it help with nuclear power?
my magic 8 ball says yes
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 16, 2024 - 3:17pm

 haresfur wrote:


Gates doesn't want to reduce CO2, he wants to minimise the increase in CO2 from the massive amount of computing power for his AI plans. There is a difference. I feel about it the way I feel about bitcoin, the product isn't worth the computing power used. Although with AI, I think there are more potential negatives to society.


i think he wrote a bestseller about avoiding climate disaster
a how to i suppose
i think he is concerned
is he going about it in a way that we all approve?
i doubt it/unlikely
overall i think he is a force for good
islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 16, 2024 - 1:29pm

 haresfur wrote:


Gates doesn't want to reduce CO2, he wants to minimise the increase in CO2 from the massive amount of computing power for his AI plans. There is a difference. I feel about it the way I feel about bitcoin, the product isn't worth the computing power used. Although with AI, I think there are more potential negatives to society.


Yeah, nuclear power is an answer to our power budget problem. But AI and bitcoin are heroin and crack to our power dependency issues.  

We are making great strides on conservation and alternative generation, and still nuclear is the only realistic option. Then you add AI compute to the mix... it's not going to end well.  Also, I don't trust most (any?) of these groups to self regulate their AI, I really don't trust them to run a nuclear power plant to sustain them.

haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 16, 2024 - 1:18pm

 miamizsun wrote:


could be
gates has made it clear he believes nuclear is a huge part of reducing co2
he has a few bets/investments with nuclear power/energy research
i was going to mention something about tax write-offs, but decided not to



Gates doesn't want to reduce CO2, he wants to minimise the increase in CO2 from the massive amount of computing power for his AI plans. There is a difference. I feel about it the way I feel about bitcoin, the product isn't worth the computing power used. Although with AI, I think there are more potential negatives to society.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 16, 2024 - 6:41am

 kcar wrote:


I haven't followed Gates' investment in nuclear power research lately, but I'd be very interested to see ANY near-term design offer realistic construction cost projections. The Vogtle plant in GA went massively over budget and was years late. 


possible update



kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: Oct 1, 2023 - 11:48am

 miamizsun wrote:


could be
gates has made it clear he believes nuclear is a huge part of reducing co2
he has a few bets/investments with nuclear power/energy research
i was going to mention something about tax write-offs, but decided not to



I haven't followed Gates' investment in nuclear power research lately, but I'd be very interested to see ANY near-term design offer realistic construction cost projections. The Vogtle plant in GA went massively over budget and was years late. 
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Oct 1, 2023 - 9:59am

U2 embraces nuclear energy.  This is major.


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 30, 2023 - 10:06am

 islander wrote:


I used to be in Data Centers and we looked at this ~7 years ago. At the time it really made a lot more sense to locate in a high sunshine area with cheap land and do big solar arrays with some wind as well if the geography worked. Nuclear has a lot of potential, but only if your scale is larger than a massive array can handle or scale to. I recall the break point was around 200-250 megawatts.  

you are also making a tradeoff on if it more cost effective to move power over a distance or data over a distance. Data is generally easier (light or microwave), but takes time (measured in milliseconds). Normally that's not a big deal, but financial guys will spend millions (multiple / hundreds) for a few milliseconds. So this makes me think that a lot of what is going on is financial. Or this is just PR / Buzzword bingo.


could be
gates has made it clear he believes nuclear is a huge part of reducing co2
he has a few bets/investments with nuclear power/energy research
i was going to mention something about tax write-offs, but decided not to

islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 30, 2023 - 9:41am

 miamizsun wrote:

I used to be in Data Centers and we looked at this ~7 years ago. At the time it really made a lot more sense to locate in a high sunshine area with cheap land and do big solar arrays with some wind as well if the geography worked. Nuclear has a lot of potential, but only if your scale is larger than a massive array can handle or scale to. I recall the break point was around 200-250 megawatts.  

you are also making a tradeoff on if it more cost effective to move power over a distance or data over a distance. Data is generally easier (light or microwave), but takes time (measured in milliseconds). Normally that's not a big deal, but financial guys will spend millions (multiple / hundreds) for a few milliseconds. So this makes me think that a lot of what is going on is financial. Or this is just PR / Buzzword bingo.
ColdMiser

ColdMiser Avatar

Location: On the Trail
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 29, 2023 - 7:45am

 miamizsun wrote:
I imagine the pool of experts is low seeing that this technology was pretty much all but dead till recently. It would be nice to see this succeed and more folks copy the application. 

Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 25, 26, 27  Next