Mamdani is the new face of the party. He is an outright communist.
Kind of rich, coming from a National Socialist wannabe.
And no, this is not a cheap shot. Srsly. think about it. What is it about communism that raises the hair on your neck? I'm guessing it is control passing to a coterie of apparatchiks who have no accountability to anyone but themselves and get to call all the shots, disenfranchising everyone on the margins as they go.
And that is different to what Trump is currently doing, how exactly?
Mamdani is the new face of the party. He is an outright communist.
Also an unrepentant antisemitic.
Without dealing with these directly, why werenât you up in arms about a man with a history of welshing on deals, repeated infidelity to his immigrant wives, multiple bankruptcies, and multiple other business failures, who put his daughter and son-in-law in the White House (where they profited multimillions from deals), and said - outright - that he planned on engaging policies that would ruin the American economy?
I mean, by touting the greatness of that loser, you think you complaining about Mamdani is gonna budge anyoneâs needle?
Seems like this youngster Dem candidate, and the "college-educated" voters who support him, is ill advised on the housing market. Making it easier to build, with perhaps some incentives to builders, is the action that works...not more regulation for an already overly regulated market.New Yorkers Vote to Make Their Housing Shortage Worse
Austin, Texas, and other red-state cities have set an example for how to make housing markets work
Seems like this youngster Dem candidate, and the "college-educated" voters who support him, is ill advised on the housing market.
Making it easier to build, with perhaps some incentives to builders, is the action that works...not more regulation for an already overly regulated market.
New Yorkers Vote to Make Their Housing Shortage Worse
Austin, Texas, and other red-state cities have set an example for how to make housing markets work
I was referring to the party machine, not the rank and file. The major donors have seemed to abandoned the party. I guess that they are mad after giving Kamala $1.5 billion dollars and losing. That and with all of that money, she still over spent and is $20 million in debt. And still lost.
just goes to show, money doesnt always win elections.
what does in this country...i have no fing idea!?
Last I heard, they are too broke to pay attention.
It's not so good to be one of the "king's" serfs.
I was referring to the party machine, not the rank and file. The major donors have seemed to abandoned the party. I guess that they are mad after giving Kamala $1.5 billion dollars and losing. That and with all of that money, she still over spent and is $20 million in debt. And still lost.
To that end... what is the likelihood (now) of any ICE crackdowns on any Trump owned/affiliated properties or construction companies building a Trump property?
Probably the safest place to be as an illegal is to be working at a Trump property. Finding and deporting any illegals at Trump property right now would not only impact operations but would be a "very bad look" for him.
Any ICE agent authorizing that would probably be in greater jeopardy that an actual immigrant.
You just proved my point, that when push comes to shove, you do not make the distinction between legal and illegal. You just give certain illegals a pass based on their circumstances and ignore the law. The law is the law is the law. And the law means nothing to you regarding this.
rgio wrote:
You must be really pissed off at Trump for deciding that farming, hotel, and other industries should, as you say ... just give certain illegals a pass based on their circumstances and ignore the law. (First 1:12 of this video) It's hard to believe how little the law means to Trump. Good thing you're going to hold him accountable....I mean... the law is the law is the law.
Hey Kurt... still waiting? C'mon...Immigration is your jam!
JFC. That part that you are demanding an answer to is not a statement about me and my interpretations.
as you say ... just give certain illegals a pass based on their circumstances and ignore the law.
No I didn't say that is what I believe. It was an accusation against veev.
the full quote and the context ...
You just proved my point, that when push comes to shove, you do not make the distinction between legal and illegal. You just give certain illegals a pass based on their circumstances and ignore the law. The law is the law is the law. And the law means nothing to you regarding this.
and that was addressing this ... VV wrote:
What you don’t understand is that while I can make the same distinction between illegal and legal immigrants as you…
that doesn’t (to me) mean that illegal immigrants trying to sneak in aren’t any less deserving of a chance. Depends upon their particular circumstance. Desperate people can and will do desperate things.
You only see what you want to see.
And you refuse to be honest about what you claim to see.
I feel you. My brother is 81, stage 4 cancer (again), and looks like a crumpled piece of paper. But, before Christmas heâll be dead. So thereâs no since fighting with him, and heâs not gonna convince anyone to change their political views. So letâs stay friends/brothers, shall we?
