Warning: file_get_contents(/home/www/settings/mirror_forum_db_enable_sql): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/content/Forum/functions.php on line 8
No, I went to edit it to include SD's quote. The deletion / repost was from switching from the current site to the legacy site in order to include his quote which inspired your remark. I am not a fan of the editor in the new website. But that's just me.
So no, I did not bump the post for your personal satisfaction.
Which brings me back to my point ... you don't want any kings involved in our government (which we don't have) but queens are OK with you. To me, royalty is royalty regardless of gender which was my point. Or put in another way ... WHOOOSH
No, I went to edit it to include SD's quote. The deletion / repost was from switching from the current site to the legacy site in order to include his quote which inspired your remark. I am not a fan of the editor in the new website. But that's just me.
So no, I did not bump the post for your personal satisfaction.
Which brings me back to my point ... you don't want any kings involved in our government (which we don't have) but queens are OK with you. To me, royalty is royalty regardless of gender which was my point. Or put in another way ... WHOOOSH
You're a prisoner of WOKE mentality, imho ...
And yet, you are enamored with a guy who behaves as if he is one, and laments that he wants even more power and control. Whooosh indeed.
Did you delete your post and then post it again to bump it for me? Gawrsh that's nice.
No, I went to edit it to include SD's quote. The deletion / repost was from switching from the current site to the legacy site in order to include his quote which inspired your remark. I am not a fan of the editor in the new website. But that's just me.
So no, I did not bump the post for your personal satisfaction.
Which brings me back to my point ... you don't want any kings involved in our government (which we don't have) but queens are OK with you. To me, royalty is royalty regardless of gender which was my point. Or put in another way ... WHOOOSH
As a duly authorized spokesperson for the entire Great State of California, I say that swapping us for Greenland would be fine. Proceed with the paperwork. California uber alles!
As a duly authorized spokesperson for the entire Great State of California, I say that swapping us for Greenland would be fine. Proceed with the paperwork.
Location: At the dude ranch / above the sea Gender:
Posted:
Jan 13, 2026 - 10:05am
ScottFromWyoming wrote:
Statehood! Not just a territory or whatever else it could be. We can't give Puerto Rico statehood because that would be too expensive but 50k Greenlanders? Cheap!
In an amusing-ish twist, the FWs have a friend who moved to England and claimed Greenlandic Inuit origins. A lie, but she sort of looks the part and she sold it. Her California-girl faux-London accent was just messed up enough that anyone who heard her speak certainly could assume she was from some strange land. So anyway they allowed her to stay because she was part of the EU.
I think she's officially a citizen of the UK now but I'm wondering if they'd revoke her visa otherwise.
As a duly authorized spokesperson for the entire Great State of California, I say that swapping us for Greenland would be fine. Proceed with the paperwork.
put it up for a vote. Let's get everyone on record.
Statehood! Not just a territory or whatever else it could be. We can't give Puerto Rico statehood because that would be too expensive but 50k Greenlanders? Cheap!
In an amusing-ish twist, the FWs have a friend who moved to England and claimed Greenlandic Inuit origins. A lie, but she sort of looks the part and she sold it. Her California-girl faux-London accent was just messed up enough that anyone who heard her speak certainly could assume she was from some strange land. So anyway they allowed her to stay because she was part of the EU.
I think she's officially a citizen of the UK now but I'm wondering if they'd revoke her visa otherwise.
