Supposedly Hochul did say that, but more diplomatically.
Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., asked Hochul, âDo you go along with the strategy from the Biden administration, which massively expanded immigration protocols that overwhelmed your city and overwhelmed your state?â âWe call for secure borders,â Hochul interjected, prompting Donalds to retort, âI never remember you calling for secure borders at all, governor.â
âYouâre putting a federal problem on our laps. And know what? It gets old after a while,â Hochul responded. âI wish you would just do your job.â
At another point, Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, asked Pritzker about whether he thought that âbiological men should be able to use womenâs restrooms.â Prtizker eventually replied, âSo youâre admitting that this is just a political circus.â Hochul, for her part, said Trumpâs actions âabsolutely undermine the sovereignty of individual states.â
And henceforth the "polite" response got ZERO attention in the media. I think Walz missed an opportunity after the guy screamed at him about stolen valor. "I think you dropped your rattle during your tantrum" would have been a good zinger.
The OP was dictating to me just what news sources are credible and which are not as far as having any discussions. I was told that all of mine are not and that I must use his to be considered meaningful in any further discussions. My reply was that your sources are no longer credible as well.
Did I get something wrong ?
So exactly what news sources are you going to allow me to use in order to be credible in your eyes ?
CNN, MSDNC, NYT, WaPo, ABC, CBS, NBC and many others...
Don't you get it? The question you are asking of others "So exactly what news sources are you going to allow me to use in order to be credible in your eyes ?" is exactly the question that everyone already had of you since you posted your laundry list of "non credible" sources and the whole reason you were responded to in the way you were.
I'm not arguing or disagreeing about Fox's problems, am I ? Fox's problems have nothing to do with CNN's problems nor does it negate them. Bringing up Fox's problems is irrelevant to any points I am making. Hence why I called it squirrel food in honour of Izzy who's famous reply to anything I post is "look, a squirrel !" Glad I could clear that up for you.
It wasn't squirrel food. It was a valid counter-point to your point that flew way over your head because you couldn't grasp it. You're an open pamphlet. Glad to set you straight.
The OP was dictating to me just what news sources are credible and which are not as far as having any discussions. I was told that all of mine are not and that I must use his to be considered meaningful in any further discussions. My reply was that your sources are no longer credible as well.
Did I get something wrong ?
So exactly what news sources are you going to allow me to use in order to be credible in your eyes ?
I'm not arguing or disagreeing about Fox's problems, am I ?
Fox's problems have nothing to do with CNN's problems nor does it negate them.
Bringing up Fox's problems is irrelevant to any points I am making. Hence why I called it squirrel food in honour of Izzy who's famous reply to anything I post is "look, a squirrel !"
Glad I could clear that up for you.
It wasn't squirrel food. It was a valid counter-point to your point that flew way over your head because you couldn't grasp it.
You're an open pamphlet. Glad to set you straight.
You all are truly amazing. Bringing a lawsuit against Fox does not change the statement I made which was :
That after everything that has been revealed about the Biden coverup you still call CNN trustworthy reflects poorly on you and your judgment.
CNN, MSDNC, NYT, WaPo, ABC, CBS, NBC and many others have totally lost their credibility. I would not consider any of those listed as reliable sources, yet you still do. All that it does is deflect from my point. It does not address my point. That Fox has its own issues does not make those of the agencies I mentioned any different. They still have lost their credibility. And I can safely say that you all do not think that what I just said above makes any sense. You believe that because Fox has its problems suddenly makes the other agencies completely credible. OK ...
You presume to make a lot of half-baked assumptions. I read the thread below. You laid claim that because of issues CNN has had means they are not trustworthy. The retort back was that the same could be said of Fox because of the problems it is having. Period. And you didn't even make that connection when it was first posted.
Glad to clear that up for ya.
I'm not arguing or disagreeing about Fox's problems, am I ?
Fox's problems have nothing to do with CNN's problems nor does it negate them.
Bringing up Fox's problems is irrelevant to any points I am making. Hence why I called it squirrel food in honour of Izzy who's famous reply to anything I post is "look, a squirrel !"
I was really hoping one of these governors when being questioned by Witch Finder General Elise Stefanik about sanctuary cities would just say to her, "when you are YOU and your fellow congress people going to do your FUCKING jobs and fix our broken immigration system? Why do all the mayors and governors have to be pawns in your constant propaganda machine. Do your fucking job or shut the fuck up!"
Supposedly Hochul did say that, but more diplomatically.
Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., asked Hochul, âDo you go along with the strategy from the Biden administration, which massively expanded immigration protocols that overwhelmed your city and overwhelmed your state?â âWe call for secure borders,â Hochul interjected, prompting Donalds to retort, âI never remember you calling for secure borders at all, governor.â
âYouâre putting a federal problem on our laps. And know what? It gets old after a while,â Hochul responded. âI wish you would just do your job.â
At another point, Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, asked Pritzker about whether he thought that âbiological men should be able to use womenâs restrooms.â Prtizker eventually replied, âSo youâre admitting that this is just a political circus.â Hochul, for her part, said Trumpâs actions âabsolutely undermine the sovereignty of individual states.â
You all are truly amazing. Bringing a lawsuit against Fox does not change the statement I made which was :
That after everything that has been revealed about the Biden coverup you still call CNN trustworthy reflects poorly on you and your judgment.
CNN, MSDNC, NYT, WaPo, ABC, CBS, NBC and many others have totally lost their credibility. I would not consider any of those listed as reliable sources, yet you still do.
All that it does is deflect from my point. It does not address my point. That Fox has its own issues does not make those of the agencies I mentioned any different. They still have lost their credibility.
And I can safely say that you all do not think that what I just said above makes any sense. You believe that because Fox has its problems suddenly makes the other agencies completely credible.
OK ...
You presume to make a lot of half-baked assumptions. I read the thread below. You laid claim that because of issues CNN has had means they are not trustworthy. The retort back was that the same could be said of Fox because of the problems it is having. Period. And you didn't even make that connection when it was first posted.
If my words are going to be included in a public tussle then Let's get this straight as to Who said What here: Please scroll back to validate.
kurtster wrote: You have a lot of nerve calling CNN a reliable source.That after everything that has been revealed about the Biden coverup you still call CNN trustworthy reflects poorly on you and your judgment. CNN, MSDNC, NYT, WaPo, ABC, CBS, NBC and many others have totally lost their credibility. I would not consider any of those listed as reliable sources, yet you still do.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Isabeau wrote: Fox News has agreed to pay $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems. The lawsuit stemmed from Fox News's coverage of the 2020 US election, where it aired false claims that Dominion's voting were used to manipulate the election results.
then kurtster wrote:
And exactly how does what you replied change anything that I stated ? All I see in your post is squirrel food..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
It's cut and paste; not mince my words with yours.
kurtster wrote:You have a lot of nerve calling CNN a reliable source.
Isabeau wrote: That after everything that has been revealed about the Biden coverup you still call CNN trustworthy reflects poorly on you and your judgment. CNN, MSDNC, NYT, WaPo, ABC, CBS, NBC and many others have totally lost their credibility. I would not consider any of those listed as reliable sources, yet you still do. Fox News has agreed to pay $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems. The lawsuit stemmed from Fox News's coverage of the 2020 US election, where it aired false claims that Dominion's voting were used to manipulate the election results.
kurtster wrote:
And exactly how does what you replied change anything that I stated ? All I see in your post is squirrel food.
And you wonder why people here seem to harsh on you. You're not interested in an intelligent debate, Kurt. You just want to yell, insult and feel insulted. You refuse to deal with evidence that contradicts or refutes your cherished, bitter beliefs. If you're not being paid to be the troll that you are, you're missing out on easy money.
You all are truly amazing. Bringing a lawsuit against Fox does not change the statement I made which was :
That after everything that has been revealed about the Biden coverup you still call CNN trustworthy reflects poorly on you and your judgment.
CNN, MSDNC, NYT, WaPo, ABC, CBS, NBC and many others have totally lost their credibility. I would not consider any of those listed as reliable sources, yet you still do.
All that it does is deflect from my point. It does not address my point. That Fox has its own issues does not make those of the agencies I mentioned any different. They still have lost their credibility.
And I can safely say that you all do not think that what I just said above makes any sense. You believe that because Fox has its problems suddenly makes the other agencies completely credible.
I was really hoping one of these governors when being questioned by Witch Finder General Elise Stefanik about sanctuary cities would just say to her, "when you are YOU and your fellow congress people going to do your FUCKING jobs and fix our broken immigration system? Why do all the mayors and governors have to be pawns in your constant propaganda machine. Do your fucking job or shut the fuck up!"
True.
First they shipped the migrants into the blue cities...those mayors attempted to take care of that population, helping with housing and jobs...
Now that they are working, settled into the population, the Magas send in the troops to beat them out. I mean, talk about inefficiency?
Walz and others are currently undergoing the rectum derived manipulative questions - such as "What Is a Woman?" and showboat answer interpretation by the Maga Faithful.
First Felon's Cabinet has officially become Witch Finder Generals. Just like the 1950's with McCarthyism. Suspicion Alone is the New Spectral Evidence.
*sigh.* Must we keep repeating history?
I was really hoping one of these governors when being questioned by Witch Finder General Elise Stefanik about sanctuary cities would just say to her, "when you are YOU and your fellow congress people going to do your FUCKING jobs and fix our broken immigration system? Why do all the mayors and governors have to be pawns in your constant propaganda machine. Do your fucking job or shut the fuck up!"
kurtster wrote:You have a lot of nerve calling CNN a reliable source.
Isabeau wrote: That after everything that has been revealed about the Biden coverup you still call CNN trustworthy reflects poorly on you and your judgment.
CNN, MSDNC, NYT, WaPo, ABC, CBS, NBC and many others have totally lost their credibility. I would not consider any of those listed as reliable sources, yet you still do.
Fox News has agreed to pay $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems. The lawsuit stemmed from Fox News's coverage of the 2020 US election, where it aired false claims that Dominion's voting were used to manipulate the election results.
And you wonder why people here seem to harsh on you. You're not interested in an intelligent debate, Kurt. You just want to yell, insult and feel insulted. You refuse to deal with evidence that contradicts or refutes your cherished, bitter beliefs.
If you're not being paid to be the troll that you are, you're missing out on easy money.
kurtster wrote:You have a lot of nerve calling CNN a reliable source.
Isabeau wrote: That after everything that has been revealed about the Biden coverup you still call CNN trustworthy reflects poorly on you and your judgment.
CNN, MSDNC, NYT, WaPo, ABC, CBS, NBC and many others have totally lost their credibility. I would not consider any of those listed as reliable sources, yet you still do.
Fox News has agreed to pay $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems. The lawsuit stemmed from Fox News's coverage of the 2020 US election, where it aired false claims that Dominion's voting were used to manipulate the election results.
kurtster wrote:
And exactly how does what you replied change anything that I stated ?
All I see in your post is squirrel food.
And you wonder why people here seem to harsh on you. You're not interested in an intelligent debate, Kurt. You just want to yell, insult and feel insulted. You refuse to deal with evidence that contradicts or refutes your cherished, bitter beliefs.
If you're not being paid to be the troll that you are, you're missing out on easy money.
Walz and others are currently undergoing the rectum derived manipulative questions - such as "What Is a Woman?" and showboat answer interpretation by the Maga Faithful.
First Felon's Cabinet has officially become Witch Finder Generals. Just like the 1950's with McCarthyism. Suspicion Alone is the New Spectral Evidence.
*sigh.* Must we keep repeating history?
Trump's Brotherhood of the Corrupt Why the president displays an affection for the world's crooks: If nobody is corrupt, then Trump is not corrupt.
In February, President Donald Trump issued an executive order suspending enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, pending a review. This week, enforcement was partly reinstated, but drastically narrowed. That brought back some personal memories.
As an investigator for Wisconsin's great progressive senator, William Proxmire, in the 1970s, I was responsible for developing two pieces of landmark legislationâthe Community Reinvestment Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. When I pass on to my reward, I'd like to be remembered for co-founding the Prospect and for my work with Sen. Proxmire on the Senate Banking Committee. It was my graduate school in political economy and the basis for my subsequent career as an economics journalist.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act was a response to an epidemic of bribery by U.S. corporations of foreign government officials. It had become almost standard practice for American corporate executives to grease foreign palms in order to get contracts. A particularly notorious case involved Lockheed, which bribed leaders of Japan, West Germany, and other nations to sell aircraft. Lockheed even bribed Japanese Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka, resulting in his resignation when the bribes were disclosed. (...)
