[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

NASA & other news from space - GeneP59 - May 18, 2022 - 4:37pm
 
Things You Thought Today - GeneP59 - May 18, 2022 - 4:31pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - GeneP59 - May 18, 2022 - 4:12pm
 
Lyrics - thisbody - May 18, 2022 - 3:42pm
 
Online Radio Platforms - starcloud - May 18, 2022 - 2:48pm
 
Guided Meditation by Bill - thisbody - May 18, 2022 - 2:45pm
 
January 20th, 2005 ~ Boycott And Meditation Day - thisbody - May 18, 2022 - 2:34pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - May 18, 2022 - 1:55pm
 
Economix - thisbody - May 18, 2022 - 1:48pm
 
songs that ROCK! - thisbody - May 18, 2022 - 1:45pm
 
COVID-19 - miamizsun - May 18, 2022 - 1:33pm
 
Trump - rgio - May 18, 2022 - 1:25pm
 
Brag about your stereo - rgio - May 18, 2022 - 11:39am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - miamizsun - May 18, 2022 - 11:18am
 
What Makes You Sad? - miamizsun - May 18, 2022 - 11:05am
 
Japan - Red_Dragon - May 18, 2022 - 10:58am
 
What Did You Do Today? - Steely_D - May 18, 2022 - 10:22am
 
Wordle - daily game - dischuckin - May 18, 2022 - 8:17am
 
Race in America - Red_Dragon - May 18, 2022 - 7:36am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - May 18, 2022 - 5:02am
 
Reccomended System or Powered Speakers - kurtster - May 18, 2022 - 1:27am
 
North Korea - Red_Dragon - May 17, 2022 - 9:07pm
 
Ukraine - kcar - May 17, 2022 - 8:03pm
 
Help Finding A Song - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 17, 2022 - 7:25pm
 
Today in History - thisbody - May 17, 2022 - 4:40pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - May 17, 2022 - 3:04pm
 
Live Music - thisbody - May 17, 2022 - 1:50pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 17, 2022 - 11:24am
 
What is the meaning of this? - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 17, 2022 - 11:15am
 
"2000 Mules" movie purports to prove 2020 election was st... - rgio - May 17, 2022 - 7:02am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - May 16, 2022 - 8:44pm
 
Buddy's Haven - oldviolin - May 16, 2022 - 6:31pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - May 16, 2022 - 6:18pm
 
Environment - Red_Dragon - May 16, 2022 - 4:42pm
 
RightWingNutZ - Red_Dragon - May 16, 2022 - 4:24pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - May 16, 2022 - 3:24pm
 
New Music - miamizsun - May 16, 2022 - 12:37pm
 
• • • Clownstock • • •  - oldviolin - May 16, 2022 - 10:17am
 
What the hell OV? - miamizsun - May 16, 2022 - 9:40am
 
Supreme Court Rulings - Red_Dragon - May 16, 2022 - 9:33am
 
Outstanding Covers - oldviolin - May 16, 2022 - 8:35am
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - May 16, 2022 - 6:26am
 
Watching My Mind Slip Away... - oldviolin - May 16, 2022 - 6:05am
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - Alchemist - May 15, 2022 - 10:12pm
 
TuneIn difficulties - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 15, 2022 - 7:02pm
 
Terrorist Watch! - Steely_D - May 15, 2022 - 5:17pm
 
Climate Change - Red_Dragon - May 15, 2022 - 1:31pm
 
Spain - Red_Dragon - May 15, 2022 - 11:04am
 
Get Your Godcast! - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2022 - 4:52pm
 
TV shows you watch - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2022 - 4:03pm
 
Republican Party - rgio - May 14, 2022 - 3:15pm
 
The Abortion Wars - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2022 - 2:20pm
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2022 - 2:08pm
 
Finland - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2022 - 11:28am
 
CRAZY Flooding Video! - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2022 - 7:35am
 
Bluesound MQA stream not working for me - Juancastilo - May 14, 2022 - 6:48am
 
Australia has Disappeared - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2022 - 6:07am
 
The Obituary Page - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 13, 2022 - 8:35pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Antigone - May 13, 2022 - 5:25pm
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - May 13, 2022 - 8:04am
 
The Dragons' Roost - GeneP59 - May 13, 2022 - 7:15am
 
Women in the World - miamizsun - May 13, 2022 - 6:21am
 
2020 Elections - Red_Dragon - May 12, 2022 - 12:34pm
 
George Carlin - GeneP59 - May 12, 2022 - 7:35am
 
Stuff I've Said Out Loud - GeneP59 - May 12, 2022 - 7:25am
 
Flower Pictures - Proclivities - May 12, 2022 - 6:29am
 
What Did You See Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 12, 2022 - 5:47am
 
Russia - miamizsun - May 12, 2022 - 4:36am
 
A motivational quote - Proclivities - May 11, 2022 - 2:01pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - Antigone - May 11, 2022 - 5:36am
 
Whatever happened to Taco Wagon? - miamizsun - May 11, 2022 - 4:13am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - haresfur - May 11, 2022 - 2:05am
 
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum - miamizsun - May 10, 2022 - 2:42pm
 
Back to the 60's - R_P - May 10, 2022 - 1:34pm
 
do you Twitter? - Red_Dragon - May 10, 2022 - 12:52pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Joe Biden Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53  Next
Post to this Topic
duchamp

duchamp Avatar

Location: Florida Panhandle
Gender: Female


Posted: Oct 27, 2008 - 5:55am

rosedraws wrote:

Those were not tough questions, those were ridiculous accusations that only fuel the distortion and smearing.

. . .


I kinda liked how Biden handled the interview. It sorta cut through the 'crap'.


rosedraws

rosedraws Avatar

Location: close to the edge
Gender: Female


Posted: Oct 27, 2008 - 5:49am

mjv1208 wrote:
I found it disappointing that Biden finally had a somewhat hard interview (not the typical softball questions) and he didn't handle it well. And then for the Obama/Biden ticket to cancel all interviews with that station until the election was really being a poor sport. The Obama/Biden ticket has received mostly a free pass from the mainstream media. If they are going to hold office they are definitely going to be under more scrutiny after the election and they will have to answer questions they don't like. They are promising a lot and the economic situation is not going to change over night. He seemed to be in shock to finally have someone give him some tough questions for a change. Someone with all of his experience should of been able to capitalize on it and state his case.


Those were not tough questions, those were ridiculous accusations that only fuel the distortion and smearing. 

This would be a tough question: "How will you keep Social Security solvent?" 

This is a stupid question: "Won't an Obama administration bring Marxism to the White House?" 

The person asking the questions was giving the ridiculous smears the same import that she should have given to genuine issues. She was embarrassing. Her goal was to perpetuate the distortion, not enlighten.  Biden gave an excellent answer to the "Spread the Wealth" question (letting the Middle class keep more of their income is NOT spreading the wealth.  Having the very wealthy pay a larger portion into the system (like they used to do) is appropriate.  Duh!) 

siderant... So many McCain supporters don't realize what they're cheering him on to do... he will continue making life too hard for the middle class so that the upper class can continue their lifestyle of excess and material gluttony.  Does anyone believe, after what we've seen since the start of these stupid Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, that ANY wealthy person is putting their money into JOBS?!?  Growing American businesses??  nope.  Trickle down economics has proven itself a failure.
/siderant

I agree that Biden is a lousy speaker.  It's the biggest reason he didn't get farther in the primary.  He was in hostile territory in this interview.  It was gracious of him to agree to meet with the news organization.  He wasn't very gracious in his response, but I don't see how anyone could be.  But he did state his case well, and didn't lose his cool.

mjv1208

mjv1208 Avatar

Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 27, 2008 - 2:24am

I meant to add state his case without getting all angry about it. He definitely was getting angry by the last question and said something about "who wrote these questions". I think Obama might of handled those questions better. Biden is a terrible speaker. After all these years you think he would of worked on improving these skills. It would be great for SNL if there was a Biden/Palin ticket. Think of all the laughs they could get out of that one.  {#Mrgreen}

 
mjv1208 wrote:
I found it disappointing that Biden finally had a somewhat hard interview (not the typical softball questions) and he didn't handle it well. And then for the Obama/Biden ticket to cancel all interviews with that station until the election was really being a poor sport. The Obama/Biden ticket has received mostly a free pass from the mainstream media. If they are going to hold office they are definitely going to be under more scrutiny after the election and they will have to answer questions they don't like. They are promising a lot and the economic situation is not going to change over night. He seemed to be in shock to finally have someone give him some tough questions for a change. Someone with all of his experience should of been able to capitalize on it and state his case.

 


mjv1208

mjv1208 Avatar

Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 27, 2008 - 2:07am

I found it disappointing that Biden finally had a somewhat hard interview (not the typical softball questions) and he didn't handle it well. And then for the Obama/Biden ticket to cancel all interviews with that station until the election was really being a poor sport. The Obama/Biden ticket has received mostly a free pass from the mainstream media. If they are going to hold office they are definitely going to be under more scrutiny after the election and they will have to answer questions they don't like. They are promising a lot and the economic situation is not going to change over night. He seemed to be in shock to finally have someone give him some tough questions for a change. Someone with all of his experience should of been able to capitalize on it and state his case.
rosedraws

rosedraws Avatar

Location: close to the edge
Gender: Female


Posted: Oct 26, 2008 - 7:25pm

owld_skipper wrote:
There are letters to the editor in our local paper today parroting all the came crapola attack arguments. These people wouldn't know a "socialist" if they were looking one in the face. They just recite the same crap to frighten and disturb.

Same thing happening here in our little paper. A whole group of people are being intentionally misinformed. The Right is abusing their right to Free Speech.


(former member)

(former member) Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 26, 2008 - 7:11pm

 rosedraws wrote:

It's so sad that the right focuses on these ridiculous distortions.  There are enough real issues to talk about.

I thought Joe handled the questions well.  Someone described this as Biden getting angry.  I thought he responded well... it is ridiculous to compare Obama's policies to Marxism.
 
Right-wing bloggers describe Biden as angry - if you bite back, you're angry. I thought Biden handled the situation well. People like Walker get their talking points faxed out to them and they go after the same things. Same things were said on Insanity and Foams and by Limbaugh. It's not about the issues, it's about disparage, divide and distress.

There are letters to the editor in our local paper today parroting all the came crapola attack arguments. These people wouldn't know a "socialist" if they were looking one in the face. They just recite the same crap to frighten and disturb.

rosedraws

rosedraws Avatar

Location: close to the edge
Gender: Female


Posted: Oct 26, 2008 - 6:50pm

owld_skipper wrote:



It's so sad that the right focuses on these ridiculous distortions.  There are enough real issues to talk about.

I thought Joe handled the questions well.  Someone described this as Biden getting angry.  I thought he responded well... it is ridiculous to compare Obama's policies to Marxism.

(former member)

(former member) Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 26, 2008 - 6:02pm




Southern_Boy

Southern_Boy Avatar

Location: On my way to the beach
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 22, 2008 - 12:26pm

 oldviolin wrote:
{#Roflol}

 
me too

oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 22, 2008 - 12:24pm

{#Roflol}
Servo

Servo Avatar

Location: Down on the Farm
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 22, 2008 - 12:23pm

 Southern_Boy wrote:
I know I shouldn't do this but...

Please show me where I had great praise for McCain and Palin.
 
I have better things to do than run around doing research for you.  Fortunately I've learned to choose my wording wisely.  You'll have to settle for that "nothing but" clause.

What?  Did you really think that I'd allow myself to get suckered into your nit-picking trap?


Southern_Boy

Southern_Boy Avatar

Location: On my way to the beach
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 22, 2008 - 11:20am

 Servo wrote:
and never hang around to justify those comments.  Speaking about human nature, I am...
 
Just as I thought...

rosedraws

rosedraws Avatar

Location: close to the edge
Gender: Female


Posted: Oct 22, 2008 - 8:33am

Southern_Boy wrote:

I know I shouldn't do this but...



{#Good-vibes}

Southern_Boy

Southern_Boy Avatar

Location: On my way to the beach
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 22, 2008 - 8:30am

 Servo wrote:

Well you did reply to wooz's post, and you did go so far as to highlight a specific part of that post!  Are you now claiming that what you did before was by accident or something?

As far as your innuendo-filled "government servants" commentary, are you claiming that everybody treats all government employees with equal enthusiasm?  "OMG, it's the dog catcher!!!  I gotta get an autograph!" {#Rolleyes}  I don't think that's realistic.

This is not a political statement, but a statement about human nature.

But what you wrote before was most certainly a political statement.  It clearly contains the word "politician".  Of course we're talking about human nature now, after I steered the conversation in that direction.

I still maintain that you're putting an undue amount of spin on the "servant" part of the oft-used term "civil servant".  Do you understand that public service is not the same as indentured servitude?

Have you ever had to work for someone else?  If so, do you believe that if someone made an offhand remark about your job that could possibly be misconstrued as being derogatory, that that comment itself is somehow license for your boss to mistreat you?  I'm asking you this because you seem to be implying rather heavily (albeit through weasel words) that Senator Biden does not deserve any respect or appreciation for his services and accomplishments, and should be seen as an inferior.  Frankly I find that assertion to be insulting.

I'm interesting in reading why you tend to reserve your negative commentary for Senators Biden and Obama, have nothing but great praise for McCain and Palin, and never hang around to justify those comments.  Speaking about human nature, I am...

 
I know I shouldn't do this but...

Please show me where I had great praise for McCain and Palin.

Servo

Servo Avatar

Location: Down on the Farm
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 22, 2008 - 7:29am

 Southern_Boy wrote:
The remark wasn't about Biden or Wooz's post, but a generalization of all government servants.
 
Well you did reply to wooz's post, and you did go so far as to highlight a specific part of that post!  Are you now claiming that what you did before was by accident or something?

As far as your innuendo-filled "government servants" commentary, are you claiming that everybody treats all government employees with equal enthusiasm?  "OMG, it's the dog catcher!!!  I gotta get an autograph!" {#Rolleyes}  I don't think that's realistic.

This is not a political statement, but a statement about human nature.

But what you wrote before was most certainly a political statement.  It clearly contains the word "politician".  Of course we're talking about human nature now, after I steered the conversation in that direction.

I still maintain that you're putting an undue amount of spin on the "servant" part of the oft-used term "civil servant".  Do you understand that public service is not the same as indentured servitude?

Have you ever had to work for someone else?  If so, do you believe that if someone made an offhand remark about your job that could possibly be misconstrued as being derogatory, that that comment itself is somehow license for your boss to mistreat you?  I'm asking you this because you seem to be implying rather heavily (albeit through weasel words) that Senator Biden does not deserve any respect or appreciation for his services and accomplishments, and should be seen as an inferior.  Frankly I find that assertion to be insulting.

I'm interesting in reading why you tend to reserve your negative commentary for Senators Biden and Obama, have nothing but great praise for McCain and Palin, and never hang around to justify those comments.  Speaking about human nature, I am...


Southern_Boy

Southern_Boy Avatar

Location: On my way to the beach
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 22, 2008 - 7:25am

 woozurbuddy wrote:

It wasn't about him being a "rock star".  It's more about the commitment our family has made to volunteering to the campaign, giving up time to canvas neighborhoods, and in my kid's case last night, spending a Tuesday night at the local HQ manning the phones canvasing undecided voters.  The fact that Senator Biden took the time at 8:30 at night after a long day of campaigning to swing by this little office to encourage the staff was impressive.  He didn't stay long but really brought everyone's spirits up.  And she'll never forget having met him that night after he's VP.

Real class, IMHO.

 
This wasn't about Biden. It was about human nature. Not a knock on anyone. Just an observation and reaction I don't understand.

rosedraws

rosedraws Avatar

Location: close to the edge
Gender: Female


Posted: Oct 22, 2008 - 7:10am

Southern_Boy wrote:

I haven't felt that thrill yet. Usually its "go away before you make me do something stupid".



rosedraws

rosedraws Avatar

Location: close to the edge
Gender: Female


Posted: Oct 22, 2008 - 7:09am

Southern_Boy wrote:

Funny how Biden is perceived as overenthusiastic and McCain is dramatic and unpredictable.

Here's the biggies: McCain's theatrics during the bailout... and choosing the campaign-boosting Palin instead of a qualified candidate. 

Joe Biden just misspeaks.

Southern_Boy

Southern_Boy Avatar

Location: On my way to the beach
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 22, 2008 - 7:07am

 rosedraws wrote:

It's a good question.  There is a thrill when you see someone famous.  But also, there is the thrill you feel if the CEO of your company stops by your office and says hello.  And there's a special thrill when you see someone famous who is also inspiring. 

Interesting stuff.
 
I haven't felt that thrill yet. Usually its "go away before you make me do something stupid".

maryte

maryte Avatar

Location: Blinding You With Library Science!
Gender: Female


Posted: Oct 22, 2008 - 7:05am

 rosedraws wrote:

Yeah, that was a classic Joe the GaffMaster comment.  He does get a bit overenthusiastic.  (I want to see the context, but haven't had time to look it up.)

Either president would get tested.  The real question is, which candidate do you think will best respond? 

As we've watched them through the campaign, Obama has been calm and thoughtful, studying issues, working toward consensus.  McCain has been dramatic and unpredictable, using scorched earth tactics to try to win. 

If you apply the same test to McCain/Palin... imagine something happening to McCain, and Palin being tested. 
 

Actually, he was referring to the state of the world - whoever wins will have to deal with the volatility of a 21st century world.  He's being realistic - no one out there is going to treat the American president with kid gloves.  Nor should they (or any world leader, for that matter).
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53  Next