[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

JFK Assassination - Steely_D - Nov 29, 2023 - 1:42am
 
NYTimes Connections - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Nov 29, 2023 - 12:18am
 
Wordle - daily game - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Nov 29, 2023 - 12:13am
 
Other Medical Stuff - kurtster - Nov 28, 2023 - 8:31pm
 
November 2023 Photo Theme - Perspective - fractalv - Nov 28, 2023 - 7:34pm
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Nov 28, 2023 - 5:41pm
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Nov 28, 2023 - 4:13pm
 
Things You Thought Today - oldviolin - Nov 28, 2023 - 3:48pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - rgio - Nov 28, 2023 - 3:33pm
 
Download Manager IPhone problems - RPnate1 - Nov 28, 2023 - 2:18pm
 
The Obituary Page - rgio - Nov 28, 2023 - 1:55pm
 
Israel - R_P - Nov 28, 2023 - 1:38pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - pilgrim - Nov 28, 2023 - 10:00am
 
Animal Resistance - lily34 - Nov 28, 2023 - 9:59am
 
Trump - kcar - Nov 28, 2023 - 9:09am
 
The Dragons' Roost - GeneP59 - Nov 28, 2023 - 8:59am
 
Name My Band - GeneP59 - Nov 28, 2023 - 8:58am
 
RP On Windows Media Player? - super88dan - Nov 28, 2023 - 7:40am
 
Economix - black321 - Nov 28, 2023 - 7:38am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Nov 28, 2023 - 7:14am
 
NY Times Spelling Bee - lily34 - Nov 28, 2023 - 6:48am
 
New mix, what would you like to see ? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 28, 2023 - 6:27am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - Manbird - Nov 27, 2023 - 7:07pm
 
Tech - what makes RP sound so good? - William - Nov 27, 2023 - 5:37pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Nov 27, 2023 - 1:35pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Nov 27, 2023 - 1:32pm
 
New Music - oldviolin - Nov 27, 2023 - 11:52am
 
Questions. - miamizsun - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:37am
 
♥ ♥ ♥ Vote For Pie ♥ ♥ ♥ - miamizsun - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:36am
 
What Puts You In the Christmas Mood? - miamizsun - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:34am
 
iPad wake screen - michaelmuller - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:11am
 
the Todd Rundgren topic - Coaxial - Nov 27, 2023 - 9:36am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Nov 27, 2023 - 7:46am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - pete_shakey - Nov 27, 2023 - 6:07am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Nov 26, 2023 - 8:25pm
 
Happy Thanksgiving! - Bill_J - Nov 26, 2023 - 5:58pm
 
Audio Problems - uaerez - Nov 26, 2023 - 12:30pm
 
Shameless Band Promotion - West Coast Division - sunybuny - Nov 26, 2023 - 11:56am
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Nov 26, 2023 - 10:45am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Nov 26, 2023 - 9:54am
 
AI Bill - timothy_john - Nov 26, 2023 - 3:52am
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 25, 2023 - 8:07pm
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - thisbody - Nov 25, 2023 - 6:36pm
 
Discussion Thread for the Meetup Meetup Topic - Red_Dragon - Nov 25, 2023 - 2:02pm
 
Europe - thisbody - Nov 25, 2023 - 1:08pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Nov 25, 2023 - 12:00pm
 
Germany - thisbody - Nov 24, 2023 - 12:29pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Nov 24, 2023 - 8:04am
 
Ukraine - Steely_D - Nov 23, 2023 - 1:20pm
 
Live Music - R_P - Nov 23, 2023 - 11:05am
 
Artificial Intelligence - thisbody - Nov 23, 2023 - 9:28am
 
It's the economy stupid. - thisbody - Nov 23, 2023 - 9:17am
 
Tech & Science - thisbody - Nov 23, 2023 - 9:08am
 
Arlo Guthrie's Alice's Restaurant Massacree - islander - Nov 23, 2023 - 7:51am
 
Coffee - haresfur - Nov 22, 2023 - 7:53pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Nov 22, 2023 - 2:08pm
 
Climate Change - thisbody - Nov 22, 2023 - 1:53pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Nov 22, 2023 - 12:26pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Nov 22, 2023 - 12:23pm
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - oldviolin - Nov 22, 2023 - 11:09am
 
Movie Recommendation - thisbody - Nov 22, 2023 - 10:28am
 
Art Show - oldviolin - Nov 21, 2023 - 10:06pm
 
Outstanding Covers - oldviolin - Nov 21, 2023 - 9:55pm
 
RightWingNutZ - Steely_D - Nov 21, 2023 - 9:06pm
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - Beez - Nov 21, 2023 - 6:36am
 
Baseball, anyone? - haresfur - Nov 20, 2023 - 7:28pm
 
2024 Elections! - thisbody - Nov 20, 2023 - 1:00pm
 
Getting ready to donate again. - trebzuk - Nov 20, 2023 - 12:40pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - touille - Nov 20, 2023 - 11:46am
 
SWELL. What else - touille - Nov 20, 2023 - 11:30am
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - lily34 - Nov 20, 2023 - 6:04am
 
Thought For The Day - oldviolin - Nov 19, 2023 - 6:29pm
 
Joe Biden - R_P - Nov 19, 2023 - 1:48pm
 
Exercise -- the dreaded E word - westslope - Nov 19, 2023 - 3:35am
 
Bad Poetry - GeneP59 - Nov 18, 2023 - 3:13pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » Europe » Ukraine Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 103, 104, 105  Next
Post to this Topic
Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 23, 2023 - 1:20pm

 ColdMiser wrote:

As far as media coverage goes this is true. I'm guessing most Americans weren't paying much attention anyway before the Middle East dustup. I think the Pro-Putin Republicans are trying to take advantage of this too. 

The Q-Anon faction has framed Ukraine as a nation of pedophiles, so they support Russia. (Again making it painfully obvious which countries have infiltrated our social media systems to our detriment.)
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 23, 2023 - 10:31am

Orwellian Morning Joe "Redefines Success" in Ukraine—Erasing Their Warmongering

Exhibit B
ColdMiser

ColdMiser Avatar

Location: On the Trail
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 13, 2023 - 7:51am

 Steely_D wrote:

Hamas/Israel has made people generally forget that this is still going on.


As far as media coverage goes this is true. I'm guessing most Americans weren't paying much attention anyway before the Middle East dustup. I think the Pro-Putin Republicans are trying to take advantage of this too. 
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 12, 2023 - 3:12pm

 westslope wrote:
Most experts would disagree that NATO has only supplied the bare minimum of armaments.  But many experts would agree that serial miscalculations have been made by NATO and Ukrainian military planners in this war.   That includes those sympathetic to pushing NATO membership up against the Russian border.

Sorry if this comes as a shock to you, but NATO was already up against the Russian border and has been since 2004. Russia's invasion of Ukraine brought it another 1,340 km of border with NATO when Finland joined. If Ukraine having the distant prospect of someday joining NATO was a threat dire enough to invade and annex large parts of the country should we just accept an invasion of Finland?

You may not be aware, but there have been more than a few discussions concerning the inadequacy of western defence industrial bases to meet the requirements of this kind of artillery-intensive 'stand-off' conflict or war of attrition.

You just made a case for expanding the western defense industrial base. Maybe you had some other point?

Then there is always the nuclear option for the truly impatient.....  Except the USA in particular is unusually vulnerable to nuclear conflict due to horrifically awful health outcomes.

Only one party to this conflict has threatened nuclear war. It also has a horrifically awful healthcare system, but has the advantage of not giving a rat's ass how its populace suffers.

The Russians are fighting an existential war.  From their perspective. 

From Putin's perspective, certainly. He needs this conflict to justify his regime. Once he no longer has an external enemy to blame Russia's myriad problems on what's his case for remaining in power?

Even a cursory knowledge of Russian history makes that proposition easy to understand.  Russia will not fall apart regardless of how badly the war goes in the next year or two.

Fortunately you have just such a cursory knowledge of Russian history! Especially recent history.

If Putin's regime fails—if the next mutiny manages to roll unchallenged the last 200 miles to Moscow from Rostov-On-Don, or if Putin chokes on a caviar-covered cracker—the Russian Federation's iron grip on its fractious empire looks exceedingly rusty. Who is his successor? Ruthlessly removing his rivals for 20 years has left him as the only object filling an immense power vacuum.

Russia has ruthlessly crushed dissent and separatist movements within its empire, but now can't even keep pipsqueak Azerbaijan from annexing Armenian territory. The countries that left the Russian orbit at the end of the Cold War have prospered; those still under Mother Russia's boot have lagged far behind. It has ruled by fear alone. What's the incentive for Dagestan or Chechnya or Karelia to stay vassals if not fear?

So the Russian empire is certainly at risk of dissolution. This is one reason for NATO's reluctance to provide all Ukraine needs to kick Russia out: Russia is holding Europe hostage against that prospect. Rather than the option you're offering (pushing one of its victims to surrender in hope that that will appease Russia's imperial ambitions) how about we encourage Russia to see this prospect of growing by conquest as untenable?

NATO country member economic and financial sanctions will continue to be largely ineffective in terms of crushing Russian will but will sap public support for a continuing military effort, especially in Europe.   Moreover, I would expect that over time increasing numbers of Germans will be asking themselves:  What have we done to ourselves?   Or.... Given the history of the 20th century, should we not have known better?

Given the history of the 20th century we absolutely should have known better.

Russia got away with invading Georgia in 2008. If it hadn't we might not be facing this crisis now.

Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 12, 2023 - 1:22pm

Hamas/Israel has made people generally forget that this is still going on.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Nov 10, 2023 - 11:52am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


well, I wouldn't rule out negotiations at some stage as that is basically how all wars end. Also that particular choice is at the sole discretion of the Ukrainians. 

But I don't buy into the thesis that US and NATO have sunk that much political capital into a "glorious military victory" because in terms of real hardware it still looks like they giving Ukraine the barest minimum to survive and NOT what they need to win the war. Why this is so beats me. The only credible argument I can think of is that they do not want Russia to break apart which would allow rogue states and actors to get their hands on the Russian nuclear arsenal. So the west seems quite happy to leave Russia and Ukraine in a confined space and is consequently giving them just enough to allow them to keep knocking their heads in, but not actually defeat each other. No other interpretation makes any sense to me.
........


Happy Monroe Doctrine!

Please.  Whether the Ukrainians go to the negotiating table and when is not entirely up to the Ukrainians.  NATO-member countries can easily indirectly influence this decision by simply drying up the supply of munitions, withdrawing or threatening to withhold financial support and similar.   Even if what remains of Ukraine ultimately is denied NATO membership, the USA and other NATO members will be called upon to de facto assure the security of what remains of Ukraine.

The real politics is simple.  There will be no sustainable negotiated settlement without US involvement.  

Most experts would disagree that NATO has only supplied the bare minimum of armaments.  But many experts would agree that serial miscalculations have been made by NATO and Ukrainian military planners in this war.   That includes those sympathetic to pushing NATO membership up against the Russian border.  

You may not be aware, but there have been more than a few discussions concerning the inadequacy of western defence industrial bases to meet the requirements of this kind of artillery-intensive 'stand-off' conflict or war of attrition.  

Then there is always the nuclear option for the truly impatient.....  Except the USA in particular is unusually vulnerable to nuclear conflict due to horrifically awful health outcomes.  

Of course none of this makes sense to you because you are unwilling to revise your initially mistaken assumptions.  The Russians are fighting an existential war.  From their perspective.  Even a cursory knowledge of Russian history makes that proposition easy to understand.  Russia will not fall apart regardless of how badly the war goes in the next year or two.   

NATO country member economic and financial sanctions will continue to be largely ineffective in terms of crushing Russian will but will sap public support for a continuing military effort, especially in Europe.   Moreover, I would expect that over time increasing numbers of Germans will be asking themselves:  What have we done to ourselves?   Or.... Given the history of the 20th century, should we not have known better?
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 10, 2023 - 4:03am

 westslope wrote:


You are so funny NoEnzo.  

Actually, I think the glorious US-lead proxy war in Ukraine was already in trouble well before the Hamas incursion into Israel and has now become the first casualty of the Israeli and US response.   

I am expecting negotiations in earnest with the Russians will start in about 14 months or later from now.   There is too much US and other NATO country member sunk political capital in a glorious military victory; moreover, the November 2024 US elections must be cleared first.  

If the proxy war bogs down as expected, there should be no more than an additional 250K Ukrainian deaths at the outside.    Likely much fewer.

When do you expect negotiations to commence?  Care to guess?



well, I wouldn't rule out negotiations at some stage as that is basically how all wars end. Also that particular choice is at the sole discretion of the Ukrainians. 

But I don't buy into the thesis that US and NATO have sunk that much political capital into a "glorious military victory" because in terms of real hardware it still looks like they giving Ukraine the barest minimum to survive and NOT what they need to win the war. Why this is so beats me. The only credible argument I can think of is that they do not want Russia to break apart which would allow rogue states and actors to get their hands on the Russian nuclear arsenal. So the west seems quite happy to leave Russia and Ukraine in a confined space and is consequently giving them just enough to allow them to keep knocking their heads in, but not actually defeat each other. No other interpretation makes any sense to me.

Yes the Ukrainian losses are appalling. But so are the Russian losses, which are only going to exacerbate its demographic problems. Whatever way you look at it, Russia's future under the current constellation doesn't look too bright. Ukraine OTOH will benefit from massive capital influx after the war from the EU and other nations, and should grow quickly.

Next point:
If Putin did in fact play a part in encouraging the Hamas attack (Russia/Iran/Hezbollah/Hamas axis) as some say then I think he has miscalculated. The prime goal for Putin should have been to encourage the Trumpists and hope for Trump to win the next election. This, coupled with nationalist parties getting into government in Europe, would have given him scope to defeat Ukraine and exert influence over Europe (read sell them oil and gas again, remove sanctions and continue infiltrating both the public and private sectors of European nations as he was successfully doing before the war. 

But by rekindling the Israeli / Hamas conflict he has made the isolationist MAGA arm of the Republicans weak and is forcing the US (regardless of whether the president is a Republican or a Democrat) back into an active global policing role. I can't see this harming the Ukrainians in any way. On the contrary, the defence industry is going to be smacking its lips at all the new business. Ukraine doesn't need a US intervention, it only needs their aging stocks of hardware that are anyway getting scrapped. It can do the rest by itself.

In this context, how the coming elections pan out in Europe is going to be very interesting. Will the current coalition of the anti-semites/nationalists/anti-vaxxers/neo-fascists/climate deniers enjoy a renaissance and plunge us all back into the dark ages?  As things currently stand, I wouldn't rule this out either. As gloomy as that might be. 


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Nov 9, 2023 - 3:00pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


so you don't want the war to finish?   Good to know.


You are so funny NoEnzo.  

Actually, I think the glorious US-lead proxy war in Ukraine was already in trouble well before the Hamas incursion into Israel and has now become the first casualty of the Israeli and US response.   

I am expecting negotiations in earnest with the Russians will start in about 14 months or later from now.   There is too much US and other NATO country member sunk political capital in a glorious military victory; moreover, the November 2024 US elections must be cleared first.  

If the proxy war bogs down as expected, there should be no more than an additional 250K Ukrainian deaths at the outside.    Likely much fewer.

When do you expect negotiations to commence?  Care to guess?

Beaker

Beaker Avatar

Location: Your safe space


Posted: Nov 9, 2023 - 8:19am

A very worthwhile read.

"(Putin's) mis- and disinformation efforts are aimed squarely at this target in Western public opinion."




Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Nov 8, 2023 - 4:11pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

nope. 

1. From a Ukrainian perspective:
The Ukrainians simply have no other option than to keep defending, even if they have to use pitchforks. To surrender would mean allowing the Russians to roll in and commit mass atrocities and ethnically cleanse all the land they take. The old adage still holds true:

  If Russia stops fighting, the war will be over. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine as it is known today will be over. So Ukraine will just keep on doing whatever it has to do.
  Russia has breached absolutely every pact it has entered into with Ukraine. There is ZERO trust remaining, so even a peace deal is highly unlikely, even if the war does come to a stalemate (which is not actually the case at the moment with Ukraine still effectively destroying Russian military assets at a rate of roughly 3:1)

2. From a Russian perspective:
To stay in power Putin needs either a victory or a perpetual war. He is using the bogeyman of NATO and the west to control his own people. It is quite simply not in his interest to find a resolution to the conflict, bar an outright victory.

3. From a U.S. perspective:
apart from the whole western ideals thing and supporting democracies against tyrants, which are valid ends in themselves, the U.S. would be crazy not to keep supporting Ukraine. For very little cost and no boots on the ground and not one serviceman/woman having to fight, they get to keep one of their main adversaries tied up and weakened for the long term.  There is NO benefit for the States in giving Russia the breathing space it needs to rejuvenate its military and reassert is geopolitical hegemony (if it even still can). Secondly, apart from the obvious benefits of a weakened Russia, this sends a strong message to China re Taiwan, i.e. an invasion is simply not worth it.

4. From a CEE perspective:
none of the CEE states (excluding a couple of minority parties in one or two of these states) want to have a strong aggressive Russia breathing down their necks and threatening reoccupation. They are firmly behind Ukraine and will continue to do what they can to support it. Poland is rearming at an extremely rapid rate for instance. Moreover, formerly neutral states, Finland and Sweden have joined NATO.

5. From an EU perspective:
The European project is heavily anchored in EU law and for it to succeed, that law needs to be respected. Ukraine's application to join the EU is already well advanced and this will be given priority. This is the way forward for the EU. Not military might. Not wars of aggression, but laws, treaties and a common market. For all its pitfalls the EU project has been extraordinarily successful. The biggest threat to it comes from nationalist movements feeding off Russian propaganda to get into power and disrupt the EU from the inside (that this is one of Putin's key objectives should be blindingly obvious to everyone).


Spot on.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 8, 2023 - 2:14pm

 thisbody wrote:
nope. 

1. From a Ukrainian perspective:
The Ukrainians simply have no other option than to keep defending, even if they have to use pitchforks. To surrender would mean allowing the Russians to roll in and commit mass atrocities and ethnically cleanse all the land they take. The old adage still holds true:

  If Russia stops fighting, the war will be over. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine as it is known today will be over. So Ukraine will just keep on doing whatever it has to do.
  Russia has breached absolutely every pact it has entered into with Ukraine. There is ZERO trust remaining, so even a peace deal is highly unlikely, even if the war does come to a stalemate (which is not actually the case at the moment with Ukraine still effectively destroying Russian military assets at a rate of roughly 3:1)

2. From a Russian perspective:
To stay in power Putin needs either a victory or a perpetual war. He is using the bogeyman of NATO and the west to control his own people. It is quite simply not in his interest to find a resolution to the conflict, bar an outright victory.

3. From a U.S. perspective:
apart from the whole western ideals thing and supporting democracies against tyrants, which are valid ends in themselves, the U.S. would be crazy not to keep supporting Ukraine. For very little cost and no boots on the ground and not one serviceman/woman having to fight, they get to keep one of their main adversaries tied up and weakened for the long term.  There is NO benefit for the States in giving Russia the breathing space it needs to rejuvenate its military and reassert is geopolitical hegemony (if it even still can). Secondly, apart from the obvious benefits of a weakened Russia, this sends a strong message to China re Taiwan, i.e. an invasion is simply not worth it.

4. From a CEE perspective:
none of the CEE states (excluding a couple of minority parties in one or two of these states) want to have a strong aggressive Russia breathing down their necks and threatening reoccupation. They are firmly behind Ukraine and will continue to do what they can to support it. Poland is rearming at an extremely rapid rate for instance. Moreover, formerly neutral states, Finland and Sweden have joined NATO.

5. From an EU perspective:
The European project is heavily anchored in EU law and for it to succeed, that law needs to be respected. Ukraine's application to join the EU is already well advanced and this will be given priority. This is the way forward for the EU. Not military might. Not wars of aggression, but laws, treaties and a common market. For all its pitfalls the EU project has been extraordinarily successful. The biggest threat to it comes from nationalist movements feeding off Russian propaganda to get into power and disrupt the EU from the inside (that this is one of Putin's key objectives should be blindingly obvious to everyone).
thisbody

thisbody Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 8, 2023 - 11:00am

Is this the beginning of the end of the war in Ukraine?
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 7, 2023 - 1:58am

Reality check on US aid to Ukraine.

"most of the money allocated to help Ukraine never leaves the US"
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 6, 2023 - 10:23pm

 black321 wrote:


I think you can take your answer and flip it to apply to Ukraine...Russia is not going to give up...to my original point, how does or will this war ever end? 
Probably not until Putin is kaput.



This guy seems to have understood the situation.

His cred:
PhD in political science from RUDN Moscow. Former assistant professor at RUDN Moscow. Political analyst. Columnist at Bloomberg Adria. 

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 6, 2023 - 10:46am

 steeler wrote:
Americans generally have short-attention spans and rather myopic views on matters of foreign policy.

🦄🦄🦄
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Nov 6, 2023 - 9:32am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Your question is worded the wrong way around:

How does Russia win? Or better said how does it get Ukraine to just roll over and die? 
(Opening the path for torture, rape and ethnic cleansing of the entire nation?)

Answer: it can't. Ukraine is not going to give up with or without US arms deliveries. Nor are the Baltic states. Poland is rapidly ramping up its arms production. The rest of Europe is slowly realising it may not be able to rely on the U.S. if Trump actually did get re-elected so is beginning to reassess its defence policies.
Russia is a dysfunctional neighbour that has proven it cannot be appeased. Ergo, Europe will need to support Ukraine for the long haul. It can and it will. 

The one alternative scenario to all of this is if pro Putin nationalist governments get elected in France and Germany in the coming years and Trump also gets re-elected. In that case I'm out of here. That would be one horrible highway to hell for the entire western hemisphere.





This will be tested and it likely will be critical. At some point, the U.S. will pull back its funding. We already are seeing a growing number of Republicans in the House saying the funding should decrease, if not stop altogether, and polling is showing more Americans saying the same. Americans generally have short-attention spans and rather myopic views on matters of foreign policy. That and the growing strain of isolationism could spell an end to funding on the scale it has been. 

It seems that Russia is counting on this and believes maintaining a stalemate is all it needs to do until this happens. If, however, Europe can provide the necessary support without the U.S., as you predict, then it would seem it will be the Russians who grow tired of a war that, stripped of ideological rhetoric, has no real meaning or justification for them.




NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 6, 2023 - 8:12am

 black321 wrote:


I think you can take your answer and flip it to apply to Ukraine...Russia is not going to give up...to my original point, how does or will this war ever end? 
Probably not until Putin is kaput.


Precisely, whereas Ukraine's stance does not rely on Zelensky.

Ukraine is opposing an invader. Russia is (edit: following a leader who is) just dreaming of days of glory past.

black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 6, 2023 - 8:08am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Your question is worded the wrong way around:

How does Russia win? Or better said how does it get Ukraine to just roll over and die? 
(Opening the path for torture, rape and ethnic cleansing of the entire nation?)

Answer: it can't. Ukraine is not going to give up with or without US arms deliveries. Nor are the Baltic states. Poland is rapidly ramping up its arms production. The rest of Europe is slowly realising it may not be able to rely on the U.S. if Trump actually did get re-elected so is beginning to reassess its defence policies.
Russia is a dysfunctional neighbour that has proven it cannot be appeased. Ergo, Europe will need to support Ukraine for the long haul. It can and it will. 

The one alternative scenario to all of this is if pro Putin nationalist governments get elected in France and Germany in the coming years and Trump also gets re-elected. In that case I'm out of here. That would be one horrible highway to hell for the entire western hemisphere.






I think you can take your answer and flip it to apply to Ukraine...Russia is not going to give up...to my original point, how does or will this war ever end? 
Probably not until Putin is kaput.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 6, 2023 - 7:22am

 black321 wrote:


How exactly does Ukraine win, or better said, how do they get Russia to quit and leave their territory?


Your question is worded the wrong way around:

How does Russia win? Or better said how does it get Ukraine to just roll over and die? 
(Opening the path for torture, rape and ethnic cleansing of the entire nation?)

Answer: it can't. Ukraine is not going to give up with or without US arms deliveries. Nor are the Baltic states. Poland is rapidly ramping up its arms production. The rest of Europe is slowly realising it may not be able to rely on the U.S. if Trump actually did get re-elected so is beginning to reassess its defence policies.
Russia is a dysfunctional neighbour that has proven it cannot be appeased. Ergo, Europe will need to support Ukraine for the long haul. It can and it will. 

The one alternative scenario to all of this is if pro Putin nationalist governments get elected in France and Germany in the coming years and Trump also gets re-elected. In that case I'm out of here. That would be one horrible highway to hell for the entire western hemisphere.




black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 6, 2023 - 7:09am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Well, the Ukrainians seem to be effectively taking out Russian air defences. If the West finally got its shit together and supplied enough F-16s the war would soon be over, 
which is what everyone wants.

And before anyone starts thinking this is war-mongering on my part and only serves the interests of the arms industry. It is not. There are huge stockpiles of retired F-16s that could be given to Ukraine without it costing anyone anything, except maybe the Russians their illusions of grandeur. It would also be the fastest, cleanest, least bloody way to end this for all concerned.





How exactly does Ukraine win, or better said, how do they get Russia to quit and leave their territory?

Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 103, 104, 105  Next