What inspires you?
- thisbody - Jul 27, 2024 - 8:01am
NYTimes Connections
- Bill_J - Jul 27, 2024 - 7:58am
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Jul 27, 2024 - 7:57am
Wordle - daily game
- islander - Jul 27, 2024 - 7:51am
NY Times Strands
- Bill_J - Jul 27, 2024 - 7:46am
Trump
- Isabeau - Jul 27, 2024 - 6:59am
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests
- Isabeau - Jul 27, 2024 - 6:55am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Jul 27, 2024 - 6:54am
How Empires Fall
- sirdroseph - Jul 27, 2024 - 6:50am
Damn Dinosaurs!
- Proclivities - Jul 27, 2024 - 6:45am
Israel
- thisbody - Jul 27, 2024 - 6:41am
Define Reality
- oldviolin - Jul 27, 2024 - 6:36am
Russia
- thisbody - Jul 27, 2024 - 6:32am
Paris Olympics
- thisbody - Jul 27, 2024 - 5:49am
J.D. Vance
- thisbody - Jul 27, 2024 - 1:34am
what the hell, miamizsun?
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 9:59pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 9:54pm
Outstanding Covers
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 26, 2024 - 9:19pm
BRING OUT YOUR DEAD
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 8:56pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 7:14pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 7:12pm
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 6:59pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 6:39pm
WHY am I so addicted to chocolate???
- kcar - Jul 26, 2024 - 6:25pm
Yellowstone is in Wyoming Meetup • Aug. 11 2007 • YEA...
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 26, 2024 - 3:59pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- DrLex - Jul 26, 2024 - 3:02pm
Things You Thought Today
- GeneP59 - Jul 26, 2024 - 2:33pm
July 2024 Photo Theme - Summer
- fractalv - Jul 26, 2024 - 8:18am
Project 2025
- rgio - Jul 26, 2024 - 5:38am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - Jul 26, 2024 - 5:01am
As California Goes, So Goes The Rest Of The Country
- kurtster - Jul 25, 2024 - 9:48pm
Neoliberalism: what exactly is it?
- Steely_D - Jul 25, 2024 - 8:24pm
What makes you smile?
- Steely_D - Jul 25, 2024 - 8:18pm
Poetry
- oldviolin - Jul 25, 2024 - 6:50pm
Things that piss me off
- Manbird - Jul 25, 2024 - 5:50pm
Electronic Music
- Manbird - Jul 25, 2024 - 5:45pm
your music
- Manbird - Jul 25, 2024 - 5:37pm
Joe Biden
- Beaker - Jul 25, 2024 - 5:10pm
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 25, 2024 - 11:56am
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Jul 25, 2024 - 10:48am
The War On You
- Isabeau - Jul 25, 2024 - 9:31am
The Obituary Page
- Antigone - Jul 25, 2024 - 8:43am
Get the Quote
- black321 - Jul 25, 2024 - 8:06am
Rhetorical questions
- oldviolin - Jul 25, 2024 - 6:36am
Message To Lucky
- oldviolin - Jul 25, 2024 - 6:22am
SCOTUS
- Red_Dragon - Jul 24, 2024 - 7:56pm
2024 Elections!
- black321 - Jul 24, 2024 - 5:56pm
Song from the TV series
- Steely_D - Jul 24, 2024 - 3:49pm
songs that ROCK!
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 10:17am
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today...
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 9:39am
Song stuck in your head?
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 9:29am
Play the Blues
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 9:24am
Songs with a Groove
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 9:04am
Climate Change
- R_P - Jul 24, 2024 - 8:54am
RightWingNutZ
- Steely_D - Jul 24, 2024 - 8:21am
favorite love songs
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 8:21am
Jam! (why should a song stop)
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 7:49am
Amazing animals!
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 12:47am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Jul 23, 2024 - 11:18pm
Kamala Harris
- haresfur - Jul 23, 2024 - 8:38pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 23, 2024 - 7:34pm
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jul 23, 2024 - 5:32pm
YouTube: Music-Videos
- Antigone - Jul 23, 2024 - 3:28pm
Animal Resistance
- R_P - Jul 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
Race in America
- R_P - Jul 23, 2024 - 12:15pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- geoff_morphini - Jul 23, 2024 - 11:42am
New Music
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 23, 2024 - 11:00am
Poetry Forum
- Isabeau - Jul 23, 2024 - 8:18am
Sampled
- R_P - Jul 22, 2024 - 6:51pm
Live Music
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 4:29pm
• • • What Makes You Happy? • • •
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 4:04pm
Kamala Harris
- kurtster - Jul 22, 2024 - 4:02pm
Europe
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 3:48pm
Got my Goat
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 3:02pm
Best wishes
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 2:20pm
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
Europe »
Ukraine
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 114, 115, 116 Next |
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 1:40pm |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
Oh, not very well at all. But it should have.
IMO US should sign up to the UCHR and obey it. It would be waaaay stronger on the international stage if it lived up to its principles. It is one of the great tragedies of the modern age that it doesn't, instead putting national interest ahead of some higher system of universal rights and accountability, such as international law.
But again, you are missing my point. I do not hold the US up to be the paragon of virtue that we should all aspire to.
All I am saying is it s a lot better than an autocratic or even fascist regime that doesn't even pay lip service to any competing values-based system. Not because the US upholds certain values more than the other regimes (although I think it does to some extent), but because the US government is at least held accountable by the electorate and can be criticised in the media, including the internet. That is not true of the other two major powers.
It is not perfect. But it is massively better than nothing.
In essence, when it comes to those actions, no. Changing parties or being allowed to criticize (to some extent, see increasing bans/media conformity/shunning) makes no difference. You can actually see the interests converge along party lines.
The only accountability is to vote them out? That has no effect on those actions performed with impunity while in office. And every time, after the fact, we can say: well, something should have happened, but didn't.
You can't bitch about/extol international law when you mostly ignore it at will.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 1:27pm |
|
R_P wrote:
Human rights is the context cudgel for all those past, present and future conflicts. Care to point out how accountability succeeded in those cases vis-a-vis international law?
Oh, not very well at all. But it should have.
IMO US should sign up to the UCHR and obey it. It would be waaaay stronger on the international stage if it lived up to its principles. It is one of the great tragedies of the modern age that it doesn't, instead putting national interest ahead of some higher system of universal rights and accountability, such as international law.
But again, you are missing my point. I do not hold the US up to be the paragon of virtue that we should all aspire to.
All I am saying is it s a lot better than an autocratic or even fascist regime that doesn't even pay lip service to any competing values-based system. Not because the US upholds certain values more than the other regimes (although I think it does to some extent), but because the US government is at least held accountable by the electorate and can be criticised in the media, including the internet. That is not true of the other two major powers.
It is not perfect. But it is massively better than nothing.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 1:11pm |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
Nuance is not really your strong suit either is it?
My standing on selected US foreign policy over the years
Vietnam War - misguided, ill-informed, driven by McCarthy-esque fear of communism
Chilean coup to put Pinochet in power - appalling. Replacing a democratically elected government with a right-wing despot
General Latin American policy - hair-raising. OTOH local politics in Latin America always does seem to be hair-raising. I'll admit, I'm out of my depth here.
Kosovo war - outstanding intervention without which things would have got very very messy as Europe stood there totally hamstrung watching atrocities unfold.
!st Gulf War - understandable given Iraqi aggression. Commendable that it stopped at the Kuwaiti border.
2nd Gulf War - inexcusable and a war crime.
Afghanistan - doomed to failure as every other intervention in the country has been
.. this is getting tedious. Point is, US foreign policy can be brilliant when it pursues the role of upholding the international charter of human rights. But it can also fall into the same pitfalls as any other major power of thinking it has to make dirty compromises to further its national interest. It basically sells itself too short and is itself responsible for a lot of its tarnished image.
So I am in, hook, line and sinker? I don't think so.
Human rights is the context cudgel for all those past, present and future conflicts. Care to point out how accountability succeeded in those (bad) cases vis-a-vis international law?
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 1:07pm |
|
R_P wrote:
Nope, you swallow the US (hegemonic) line along with the hook and sinker. And the rod if you could.
Nuance is not really your strong suit either is it?
My standing on selected US foreign policy over the years
Vietnam War - misguided, ill-informed, driven by McCarthy-esque fear of communism
Chilean coup to put Pinochet in power - appalling. Replacing a democratically elected government with a right-wing despot
General Latin American policy - hair-raising. OTOH local politics in Latin America always does seem to be hair-raising. I'll admit, I'm out of my depth here.
Kosovo war - outstanding intervention without which things would have got very very messy as Europe stood there totally hamstrung watching atrocities unfold.
!st Gulf War - understandable given Iraqi aggression. Commendable that it stopped at the Kuwaiti border.
2nd Gulf War - inexcusable and a war crime.
Afghanistan - doomed to failure as every other intervention in the country has been
.. this is getting tedious. Point is, US foreign policy can be brilliant when it pursues the role of upholding the international charter of human rights. But it can also fall into the same pitfalls as any other major power of thinking it has to make dirty compromises to further its national interest. It basically sells itself too short and is itself responsible for a lot of its tarnished image.
So I am in, hook, line and sinker? I don't think so.
No, you are confusing my passion for pluralism with US hegemony. They share common ground, but they are not the same thing.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 12:48pm |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
sigh, and again not what I said. You are trying to tie me to US realpolitik. The "he may be a sonnabitch but he's our sonnabitch" side of US foreign policy. That's not my calling. Surprisingly, I am free to criticise all three great powers at the same time. Marvellous isn't it? One of the benefits of pluralism, they don't lock you up when you criticise the government.
Nope, you swallow the US (hegemonic) line along with the hook and sinker. And the rod if you could.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 12:40pm |
|
R_P wrote:
It makes your crusading rhetoric against "authoritarianism" hollow and self-serving. It's ultimately always about economic interests. For all parties involved.
sigh, and again not what I said. You are trying to tie me to US realpolitik. The "he may be a sonnabitch but he's our sonnabitch" side of US foreign policy. That's not my calling. Surprisingly, I am free to criticise all three great powers at the same time. Marvellous isn't it? One of the benefits of pluralism, they don't lock you up when you criticise the government.
And no, I strongly disagree that it is "ultimately always about economic interests, for all parties involved." Though it is becoming clearer by the day, that ultimately you see things through this prism and therefore have no problem relativizing the various horrors of your regime of choice.
But if you throw out values for a purely economic-driven model, what do you have left? Not much I would argue. It kind of leaves you as hollow and vacuous as the German government kowtowing to China each time there is a state visit or selling out its gas industry to Gazprom and inviting. Russian spies into the highest level of government out of some weird combination of Schuldgefühl and modern-day appeasement, with a dash of making a quick personal monetary gain.
No, I'm more the Lithuanian kind of guy.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 12:28pm |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
That's not what I said either.
It makes your crusader rhetoric against "authoritarianism" hollow and self-serving. It's ultimately always about economic interests. For all parties involved.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 12:26pm |
|
R_P wrote:
That's what it means. Though there are exceptions to the rule. See the dictators armed and supported by The West.
That's not what I said either.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 12:23pm |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
That's not what I said.
That's what it means. Though there are exceptions to the rule. See the dictators armed and supported by The West.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 12:20pm |
|
R_P wrote:
You can abuse power as long as your democratic. Yum-yum.
That's not what I said.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 12:20pm |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
Oh, I am not excusing any of the abuses of power that the US have been guilty of since WWII nor am I saying that the US is a paragon of accountability. All I am saying is that of the three, the US has the most accountability. Paradoxically, Trump is perfect proof that democracy is actually alive and kicking in the US. You can't say that about either Russia or China.
You can abuse power as long as you're "democratic." Yum-yum.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 12:16pm |
|
R_P wrote:
Sounds like special pleading and another gratuitous rim-job.
Oh, I am not excusing any of the abuses of power that the US have been guilty of since WWII nor am I saying that the US is a paragon of accountability. All I am saying is that of the three, the US has the most accountability. Paradoxically, Trump is perfect proof that democracy is actually alive and kicking in the US. You can't say that about either Russia or China.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 12:11pm |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
Yet of the great powers, the U.S. is the one with the most accountability.
Sounds like special pleading and another gratuitous rim-job.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 12:07pm |
|
R_P wrote:
Bravo!
Why, thank you. Now for my next act.. let's talk about your blithe disdain for the plight of the Uighurs but foaming-at-the-mouth outrage about the plight of the Palestinians. Shall we go on?
.. maybe not. The point stands, you are only outraged when you can blame it on the U.S. If it is Russia or China, you turn a blind eye. Yet of the great powers, the U.S. is the one with the most accountability. Ergo your true target is not the source of moral outrage, but the accountability for it.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 11:59am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
And finally, if you really think that NATO was seriously behind this, then it has done a spectacularly bad job of it.
Bravo! Hubris too.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 11:57am |
|
R_P wrote:
Denial as well as a self-serving "Putin Versteher?" Nope, NATO was warned...
You pull too much right out of your backside.
Well, you are pulling precious little left out of yours, FWIW.
re the NATO expansion hypothesis:
the timeline simply doesn't fit.
Firstly, NATO already had a direct border with Russia.
Secondly, the Cuban missile analogy has been obsolete ever since the advent of nuclear submarines.
Thirdly, Putin himself has repeatedly asserted the goal is to recreate the Soviet empire, so this is obviously not about self-defence but hegemony, a position reiterated every night on Russian state TV.
Fourthly, Russia's recent wars of aggression march across the map from east to west Chechnya, Georgia, Aleppo, Crimea, rest of Ukraine
Fifthly, the Maiden uprising was followed by Belarus electing a non-Russian-puppet government, which was put down by force, followed shortly thereafter by the full blown attack on Ukraine.
It is not NATO that freaks out Putin, it is the fear of losing control over his own country in the face of spreading western pluralism that freaks him out.
And finally, if you really think that NATO was seriously behind this, then it has done a spectacularly bad job of it. I mean not arming your vassals for a full six months while they fight the supposed demon, is one thing, something that one could possibly ascribe to MAGA, but from the get go, the west has gone to enormous lengths to hamstring its own response. Were they truly the aggressor here, they wouldn't have done that.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 11:37am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
That's not hysteria. That is what the Russian regime itself is saying. Tone from the top and all that.
Hang on, weren't you also on the "Russia is not going to invade bandwagon" pre February 2022?
Denial as well as a self-serving "Putin Versteher?" Nope, NATO was warned...
You pull too much right out of your backside.
And that includes prescribing "the only credible argument." Hubris to the end.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 11:27am |
|
R_P wrote:
The obvious hysteria suggests otherwise: "the suitcases are ready" because "it won't be long before the Russians invade Germany again!!!1!!". Heil NATO! Mildly paraphrased.
That's not hysteria. That is what the Russian regime itself is saying. Tone from the top and all that.
Hang on, weren't you also on the "Russia is not going to invade bandwagon" pre February 2022?
You know R_P, the only credible argument to raise against western pluralism that progressives have is that western pluralism is hollow, democracy a charade and that all media are in the hands in of the ruling elite who are milking the system to their own advantage and to the detriment of everyone else.
It's not an argument I agree with but it is an argument that has certain merits and is logically consistent with what one would commonly understand under the term "progressive".
But when you then hold up the most despotic regimes and one-party states as the preferred alternative, then I can't help but call foul.
The necessary conclusion is that iIt's not democracy or pluralism you are after. What is it then?
Maybe you are mourning the demise of the Dutch empire? I mean some country somewhere must offer the holy grail of autocracy and true one party rule.. Maybe it's China?
Face it. At heart you actually are a reactionary and philosophically very close to ThisBody who also mourns the certainty of monarchy to resolve the inherent messiness of democracy.
That's not progressive. That's regressive.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 11:01am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
for the record, I'm not Russophobic in the slightest. There is a ton of Russian literature and music that I love.. I have no problem with Russia.
The obvious hysteria suggests otherwise: "the suitcases are ready" because "it won't be long before the Russians invade Germany again!!!1!!". Heil NATO! Mildly paraphrased.
I'm not Sinophobic either because I like Chinese food...
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 13, 2024 - 10:57am |
|
R_P wrote:
Russophobic "centrist" cheerleader for (yet another failing) war shoots the messenger. TL;DR x 2.
Sounds a lot like Trump fulminating against "the leftist marxist radicals." Onward to China!
Richard the Reactionary fires another salvo!!
for the record, I'm not Russophobic in the slightest. There is a ton of Russian literature and music that I love.. I have no problem with Russia.
No, I'm just phobic towards autocratic regimes that turn toxic, which seems to be quite prevalent in regimes that feel no accountability to anyone but themselves.
Recommended reading for befuddled progressives
|
|
|